Re: [PATCH 1/7] gnu: ncdu: Update to 1.11.

[Mathieu Lirzin <mthl@openmailbox.org>]

Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> writes:

> * gnu/packages/ncdu.scm (ncdu): Update to 1.11.
> ---
>  gnu/packages/ncdu.scm | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gnu/packages/ncdu.scm b/gnu/packages/ncdu.scm
> index 6c3d617..0b3fc66 100644
> --- a/gnu/packages/ncdu.scm
> +++ b/gnu/packages/ncdu.scm
> @@ -27,14 +27,14 @@
>  (define-public ncdu
>    (package
>     (name "ncdu")
> -   (version "1.10")
> +   (version "1.11")
>     (source (origin


>  	    (method url-fetch)
>  	    (uri (string-append "http://dev.yorhel.nl/download/ncdu-"
>  				version ".tar.gz"))
>  	    (sha256
>  	     (base32
> -	      "0rqc5wpqcbfqpcwxgh3jxwa0yw2py0hv0acpsf0a9g6v9144m6gm"))))
> +	      "0yxv87hpal05p6nii6rlnai5a8958689l9vz020w4qvlwiragbnh"))))

Not related to this update but guix lint report undesired tabulations on
these lines. It's fine to silently untabify them with this commit.

>     (inputs
>      `(("ncurses" ,ncurses)))
>     (build-system gnu-build-system)
> @@ -44,5 +44,5 @@ run on a remote server where you don't have an entire graphical setup, but have
>  to do with a simple SSH connection. ncdu aims to be fast, simple and easy to
>  use, and should be able to run in any minimal POSIX-like environment with
>  ncurses installed.")
> -   (license (x11-style "http://g.blicky.net/ncdu.git/plain/COPYING?id=v1.10"))
> +   (license (x11-style "http://g.blicky.net/ncdu.git/plain/COPYING?id=v1.11"))

Since it has high probability to change every next version, I will be in
favor of this

   (license (x11-style
             (string-append "http://g.blicky.net/ncdu.git/plain/COPYING?id=v"
                            version)))

Maybe there is something with doing that, what do others think?

--
Mathieu Lirzin