From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mathieu Lirzin <mthl@openmailbox.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] gnu: ncdu: Update to 1.11.
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 18:26:46 +0200
Message-ID: <87zj0up7eh.fsf@openmailbox.org>
References: <1441892864-20745-1-git-send-email-efraim@flashner.co.il>
	<1441892864-20745-2-git-send-email-efraim@flashner.co.il>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40442)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mthl@openmailbox.org>) id 1Za4gj-0004OP-Bv
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2015 12:27:06 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mthl@openmailbox.org>) id 1Za4gf-0001cF-CJ
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2015 12:27:05 -0400
Received: from smtp17.openmailbox.org ([62.4.1.51]:35906)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mthl@openmailbox.org>) id 1Za4gf-0001bD-4N
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2015 12:27:01 -0400
In-Reply-To: <1441892864-20745-2-git-send-email-efraim@flashner.co.il> (Efraim
	Flashner's message of "Thu, 10 Sep 2015 16:47:38 +0300")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> writes:

> * gnu/packages/ncdu.scm (ncdu): Update to 1.11.
> ---
>  gnu/packages/ncdu.scm | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gnu/packages/ncdu.scm b/gnu/packages/ncdu.scm
> index 6c3d617..0b3fc66 100644
> --- a/gnu/packages/ncdu.scm
> +++ b/gnu/packages/ncdu.scm
> @@ -27,14 +27,14 @@
>  (define-public ncdu
>    (package
>     (name "ncdu")
> -   (version "1.10")
> +   (version "1.11")
>     (source (origin


>  	    (method url-fetch)
>  	    (uri (string-append "http://dev.yorhel.nl/download/ncdu-"
>  				version ".tar.gz"))
>  	    (sha256
>  	     (base32
> -	      "0rqc5wpqcbfqpcwxgh3jxwa0yw2py0hv0acpsf0a9g6v9144m6gm"))))
> +	      "0yxv87hpal05p6nii6rlnai5a8958689l9vz020w4qvlwiragbnh"))))

Not related to this update but guix lint report undesired tabulations on
these lines. It's fine to silently untabify them with this commit.

>     (inputs
>      `(("ncurses" ,ncurses)))
>     (build-system gnu-build-system)
> @@ -44,5 +44,5 @@ run on a remote server where you don't have an entire graphical setup, but have
>  to do with a simple SSH connection. ncdu aims to be fast, simple and easy to
>  use, and should be able to run in any minimal POSIX-like environment with
>  ncurses installed.")
> -   (license (x11-style "http://g.blicky.net/ncdu.git/plain/COPYING?id=v1.10"))
> +   (license (x11-style "http://g.blicky.net/ncdu.git/plain/COPYING?id=v1.11"))

Since it has high probability to change every next version, I will be in
favor of this

   (license (x11-style
             (string-append "http://g.blicky.net/ncdu.git/plain/COPYING?id=v"
                            version)))

Maybe there is something with doing that, what do others think?

--
Mathieu Lirzin