Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add ungoogled-chromium.

[Brett Gilio <brettg@posteo.net>]

Adonay Felipe Nogueira writes:

> Em 16/02/2019 12:18, Julie Marchant escreveu:
>> libre? The only argument I've seen on the matter is the way copyright
>> works, but Chromium is under the Modified BSD License according to
>> documentation I was able to find. If some files are not actually covered
>
> For what is worth, what I learned with projects that don't follow the
> Open Source Definition (I know that I shouldn't support this term here,
> but I had to mention it) is that they mask their non-compliance behind a
> license. Of course we don't intend to foster open source here, as this
> project, having the goal to provide a package manager that is under the
> GNU project, also aims to create a system distribution that follows the
> GNU FSDG and uses such package manager
>
> If the norm would be to only check the licenses, then we would have for
> example, taken ages to figure out that the kernel source files from
> upstream of GNU Linux-libre was/is non-free.
>
> Having a requirement for a package to be first throughly reviewed
> eliminates some of the possibility of having non-free functional data or
> non-distributable non-functional data. It's not a perfect protection
> (since the package in review might have implemented things from other
> works that one of the reviewers might not be aware of).
>
> As I said in a message to these mailing lists, I already started
> reviewing Chromium, although this project is big and I might not have
> the time nor all the skills to do it alone. Since today, I moved the
> review, which was available at [1], to the appropriate Review namespace
> at [2].
>
>
> [1] https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Talk:Chromium
> [2] https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Review:Chromium-REV-ID-1

Adonay, thank you for taking the initiative here! I think this is a
needed step forward.

Brett Gilio