* bug#19764: Downgrade reported as an ugprade
@ 2015-02-04 9:15 Ludovic Courtès
2015-02-04 16:18 ` Mark H Weaver
2015-02-08 18:02 ` Ludovic Courtès
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2015-02-04 9:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 19764
As seen during a ‘guix package’ demo at FOSDEM, downgrades are reported
as upgrades as of 0.8.1.
Ludo’.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* bug#19764: Downgrade reported as an ugprade
2015-02-04 9:15 bug#19764: Downgrade reported as an ugprade Ludovic Courtès
@ 2015-02-04 16:18 ` Mark H Weaver
2015-02-08 18:09 ` Ludovic Courtès
2015-02-08 18:02 ` Ludovic Courtès
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Mark H Weaver @ 2015-02-04 16:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ludovic Courtès; +Cc: 19764
ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> As seen during a ‘guix package’ demo at FOSDEM, downgrades are reported
> as upgrades as of 0.8.1.
I don't know about this one, but another problem with our upgrade
command is that it mishandles outputs other than "out", at least in the
console output. It _always_ says it's upgrading them.
Mark
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* bug#19764: Downgrade reported as an ugprade
2015-02-04 16:18 ` Mark H Weaver
@ 2015-02-08 18:09 ` Ludovic Courtès
2015-02-09 14:55 ` Andreas Enge
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2015-02-08 18:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark H Weaver; +Cc: 19764
Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org> skribis:
> I don't know about this one, but another problem with our upgrade
> command is that it mishandles outputs other than "out", at least in the
> console output. It _always_ says it's upgrading them.
From a quick check, ‘manifest-transaction-effects’ reports the right
thing when upgrading just a single output.
Could you send an example that illustrates the problem?
TIA,
Ludo’.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* bug#19764: Downgrade reported as an ugprade
2015-02-04 9:15 bug#19764: Downgrade reported as an ugprade Ludovic Courtès
2015-02-04 16:18 ` Mark H Weaver
@ 2015-02-08 18:02 ` Ludovic Courtès
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2015-02-08 18:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 19764-done
ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) skribis:
> As seen during a ‘guix package’ demo at FOSDEM, downgrades are reported
> as upgrades as of 0.8.1.
Fixed in 46b23e1:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
$ ./pre-inst-env guix package -p foo -i guile-1.8.8 -n
gnu/packages/guile.scm:50:2: rimarko: ni uzas guile-1.8.8 sed guile-2.0.11 disponeblas unuanivele
The following package would be downgraded:
guile 2.0.11 → 1.8.8 /gnu/store/660m94139bka6mi7bdja5nvvqwq61zkk-guile-1.8.8
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
Ludo'.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-02-09 17:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-02-04 9:15 bug#19764: Downgrade reported as an ugprade Ludovic Courtès
2015-02-04 16:18 ` Mark H Weaver
2015-02-08 18:09 ` Ludovic Courtès
2015-02-09 14:55 ` Andreas Enge
2015-02-09 17:19 ` Ludovic Courtès
2015-02-08 18:02 ` Ludovic Courtès
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).