From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: bug#19764: Downgrade reported as an ugprade
Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2015 19:09:16 +0100
Message-ID: <871tm0qnqr.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <878ugem3zl.fsf@gnu.org> <87r3u5hcqp.fsf@netris.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52469)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1YKWJ1-0002Pt-LL
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Feb 2015 13:10:04 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1YKWJ0-00027J-HT
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Feb 2015 13:10:03 -0500
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:46283)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1YKWJ0-00026y-DG
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Feb 2015 13:10:02 -0500
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1YKWJ0-0004he-1d
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Feb 2015 13:10:02 -0500
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.19764.B19764.142341896618027@debbugs.gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <87r3u5hcqp.fsf@netris.org> (Mark H. Weaver's message of "Wed, 04
	Feb 2015 11:18:06 -0500")
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org>
Cc: 19764@debbugs.gnu.org

Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org> skribis:

> I don't know about this one, but another problem with our upgrade
> command is that it mishandles outputs other than "out", at least in the
> console output.  It _always_ says it's upgrading them.

>From a quick check, =E2=80=98manifest-transaction-effects=E2=80=99 reports =
the right
thing when upgrading just a single output.

Could you send an example that illustrates the problem?

TIA,
Ludo=E2=80=99.