From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
Subject: bug#19764: Downgrade reported as an ugprade
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 15:55:57 +0100
Message-ID: <20150209145557.GA28061@debian>
References: <878ugem3zl.fsf@gnu.org> <87r3u5hcqp.fsf@netris.org>
	<871tm0qnqr.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55371)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1YKplr-0003Jc-Jv
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 09:57:08 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1YKpln-0006vJ-Fo
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 09:57:07 -0500
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:47137)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1YKpln-0006uZ-Dk
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 09:57:03 -0500
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1YKplm-0003Ns-Q2
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 09:57:03 -0500
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.19764.B19764.142349379113000@debbugs.gnu.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <871tm0qnqr.fsf@gnu.org>
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: 19764@debbugs.gnu.org

Now, pseudo-upgrades are reported as downgrades. Namely, when the version
number of a package does not increase, but something changes with respect
to its inputs. I would suggest to treat them as upgrades.

Andreas