unofficial mirror of bug-guix@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
To: 46925@debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: Francois.JOULAUD@radiofrance.com, jsoo1@asu.edu
Subject: bug#46925: Ripgrep tests failures due to bstr update
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2021 22:40:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <875z21494k.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210308161856.rme6tdhbbr44zdev@fjo-extia-HPdeb.example.avalenn.eu> ("JOULAUD François via Bug reports for GNU Guix"'s message of "Mon, 8 Mar 2021 16:22:02 +0000")

Hello,

JOULAUD François via Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix@gnu.org> writes:

> Two possibilities seems to be possible here.
>
> Upgrade rust-bstr-0.2 to be 0.2.12, possibly only upgrading needed
> dependent packages.

Just to be clear, your are suggesting a downgrade, because currently,
Guix packages bstr 0.2.15. Downgrading is not trivial because bstr
0.2.15 is mandatory for bat 0.18.

We might provide both bstr 0.2.12 and 0.2.15. Note that 11 packages are
requiring bstr. Providing two bstr is only possible if none of those
packages are both among bat and ripgrep dependencies. I didn't check but
I'm not very optimistic.

> Patch new ripgrep to understand the old bstr debug format in its
> tests.

I'll pass, sorry.

> Disabling tests is bad. Disabling tests when we diverge from supported
> upstream configuration (in this cas as we don't use recommended version
> of deps) is in my opinion even worst.

I'm not sure this kind of generalization helps here. Even if you may be
right in theory, looking at the number of "#:tests #f" among packages,
disabling tests is probably a necessary evil in practice.

Moreover, AFAICT, this incompatibility does not break functionality in
ripgrep. It just breaks its tests. Disabling them for a while does not
sound so bad, after all. Is it?

Regards,
-- 
Nicolas Goaziou




  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-08 21:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-04 16:40 bug#46925: Ripgrep tests failures due to bstr update John Soo
2021-03-04 20:38 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2021-03-08 16:22   ` JOULAUD François via Bug reports for GNU Guix
2021-03-08 21:40     ` Nicolas Goaziou [this message]
2021-03-09 11:34       ` JOULAUD François via Bug reports for GNU Guix
2021-03-09 15:39       ` John Soo
2021-03-10 13:42         ` Nicolas Goaziou
2021-03-10 13:44           ` John Soo
2021-03-10 14:01             ` Nicolas Goaziou

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://guix.gnu.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=875z21494k.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr \
    --to=mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr \
    --cc=46925@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=Francois.JOULAUD@radiofrance.com \
    --cc=jsoo1@asu.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).