unofficial mirror of bug-guix@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Attila Lendvai <attila@lendvai.name>
To: 56799@debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: Attila Lendvai <attila@lendvai.name>
Subject: bug#56799: [PATCH 5/5] services: configuration: Change the value of the unset marker.
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2022 14:40:42 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220824124042.10959-5-attila@lendvai.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220824124042.10959-1-attila@lendvai.name>

The new value of %unset-value sticks out more when something goes wrong, and
is also more unique; i.e. easier to search for.
---
 gnu/services/configuration.scm   | 5 +++--
 gnu/services/messaging.scm       | 2 +-
 tests/services/configuration.scm | 2 +-
 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gnu/services/configuration.scm b/gnu/services/configuration.scm
index 60965486a7..83da63c1b3 100644
--- a/gnu/services/configuration.scm
+++ b/gnu/services/configuration.scm
@@ -305,12 +305,13 @@ (define serialize-package empty-serializer)
 
 ;; Ideally this should be an implementation detail, but we export it
 ;; to provide a simpler API that enables unsetting a configuration
-;; field that has a maybe type, but also a default value.
+;; field that has a maybe type, but also a default value.  We give it
+;; a value that sticks out to the reader when something goes wrong.
 ;;
 ;; An example use-case would be something like a network application
 ;; that uses a default port, but the field can explicitly be unset to
 ;; request a random port at startup.
-(define %unset-value 'unset)
+(define %unset-value '%unset-marker%)
 
 (define (maybe-value-set? value)
   "Predicate to check whether a 'maybe' value was explicitly provided."
diff --git a/gnu/services/messaging.scm b/gnu/services/messaging.scm
index 59cb486778..02712ede7c 100644
--- a/gnu/services/messaging.scm
+++ b/gnu/services/messaging.scm
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ (define (make-pred arg)
                                  ;; doesn't interfere with
                                  ;; define-configuration and define-maybe
                                  ;; internals.
-                                 #''unset def))
+                                 #''%unset-marker% def))
                            #'(def ...) #'(target ...)))
                      ((new-doc ...)
                       (map (lambda (doc target)
diff --git a/tests/services/configuration.scm b/tests/services/configuration.scm
index 8ed4ed4b66..4f8a74dc8a 100644
--- a/tests/services/configuration.scm
+++ b/tests/services/configuration.scm
@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ (define-configuration config-with-maybe-symbol
   (protocol maybe-symbol ""))
 
 ;;; Maybe symbol values are currently seen as serializable, because the
-;;; unspecified value is 'unset, which is a symbol itself.
+;;; unspecified value is '%unset-marker%, which is a symbol itself.
 ;;; TODO: Remove expected fail marker after resolution.
 (test-expect-fail 1)
 (test-equal "symbol maybe value serialization, unspecified"
-- 
2.35.1





  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-08-24 12:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-27 16:23 bug#56799: (gnu services configuration) usage of *unspecified* is problematic Maxim Cournoyer
2022-07-27 16:43 ` Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix
2022-07-27 18:27   ` Attila Lendvai
2022-07-28 15:15     ` Maxim Cournoyer
2022-07-27 18:31   ` Maxim Cournoyer
2022-07-27 18:45     ` Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix
2022-07-27 19:09       ` Maxim Cournoyer
2022-07-27 19:45         ` bug#56799: [PATCH] services: configuration: Step back from *unspecified* Maxim Cournoyer
2022-07-27 19:46         ` bug#56799: (gnu services configuration) usage of *unspecified* is problematic Maxim Cournoyer
2022-07-27 20:20           ` bug#56799: [PATCH v2] gexp: Handle *unspecified* as a gexp input Maxim Cournoyer
2022-07-27 21:43             ` Maxime Devos
2022-07-28 14:58               ` Maxim Cournoyer
2022-07-28  4:41           ` bug#56799: [PATCH v3] " Maxim Cournoyer
2022-08-01  5:08             ` bug#56799: (gnu services configuration) usage of *unspecified* is problematic Maxim Cournoyer
2022-08-01 10:00               ` Maxime Devos
2022-08-01 12:46                 ` Maxim Cournoyer
2022-08-01 13:44             ` Ludovic Courtès
2022-08-01 16:55       ` Maxim Cournoyer
2022-07-28  4:55     ` bokr
2022-07-28 10:26       ` Maxime Devos
2022-07-28 15:09         ` Maxim Cournoyer
2022-08-01 13:49 ` Ludovic Courtès
2022-08-01 15:55   ` Maxim Cournoyer
2022-08-02  7:31     ` Ludovic Courtès
2022-08-02  8:45       ` bokr
2022-08-02 15:06       ` Maxim Cournoyer
2022-08-04 12:19         ` Ludovic Courtès
2022-08-07 22:44           ` Ludovic Courtès
2022-08-08 22:27           ` Attila Lendvai
2022-08-08 23:35             ` Attila Lendvai
2022-08-10  2:17               ` Maxim Cournoyer
2022-08-10  3:26             ` Maxim Cournoyer
2022-08-11 10:15               ` Attila Lendvai
2022-08-13  6:31                 ` Maxim Cournoyer
2022-08-13 16:47                   ` Attila Lendvai
2022-08-14  2:57                     ` Maxim Cournoyer
2022-08-16 14:00                       ` Attila Lendvai
2022-08-17 13:16                         ` Maxim Cournoyer
2022-08-17 16:00                           ` paren--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix
2022-08-10  0:43           ` Maxim Cournoyer
2022-08-24 12:40 ` bug#56799: [PATCH 1/5] services: configuration: Add a 'maybe-value-set?' procedure Attila Lendvai
2022-08-24 12:40   ` bug#56799: [PATCH 2/5] services: configuration: Add %unset-value exported variable Attila Lendvai
2022-08-24 12:40   ` bug#56799: [PATCH 3/5] services: configuration: Add maybe-value exported procedure Attila Lendvai
2022-08-24 12:40   ` bug#56799: [PATCH 4/5] services: Use the new maybe/unset API Attila Lendvai
2022-08-25  4:18     ` bug#56799: (gnu services configuration) usage of *unspecified* is problematic Maxim Cournoyer
2022-08-24 12:40   ` Attila Lendvai [this message]
2022-08-25  4:14     ` Maxim Cournoyer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://guix.gnu.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220824124042.10959-5-attila@lendvai.name \
    --to=attila@lendvai.name \
    --cc=56799@debbugs.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).