* Logo proposal @ 2020-01-26 16:59 sirgazil 2020-01-26 19:14 ` Marc Chantreux ` (2 more replies) 0 siblings, 3 replies; 19+ messages in thread From: sirgazil @ 2020-01-26 16:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Guile User Hi, It's been a while since I designed the current Guile logo. This logo has what I called retracted and expanded forms. The former is the G in parenthesis, and the latter is the one in the website header bar. I'm fine with the retracted form, I actually like it, but everytime I see the expanded form, the overlapping of shapes bothers me. So I would like to propose two alternative designs: https://multimedialib.files.wordpress.com/2020/01/guile-logo-proposal-2020-01-24.png Personally, I like the one with the single lambda. What do you think? --- https://sirgazil.bitbucket.io/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: Logo proposal 2020-01-26 16:59 Logo proposal sirgazil @ 2020-01-26 19:14 ` Marc Chantreux 2020-01-26 19:27 ` sirgazil 2020-01-26 23:30 ` Arne Babenhauserheide 2020-01-26 22:47 ` John Cowan 2020-01-28 9:26 ` Ludovic Courtès 2 siblings, 2 replies; 19+ messages in thread From: Marc Chantreux @ 2020-01-26 19:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: sirgazil; +Cc: Guile User hello, > It's been a while since I designed the current Guile logo. my perspective as newcomer: * the current logo is splendid * i feel it fits better with the visual identity of the language > What do you think? * amazing! but nothing compares to the current one :) * it would be cool to have λ as an alias to lambda in guile so we could be able to write (λ (x) (* x x)) my two cents marc ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: Logo proposal 2020-01-26 19:14 ` Marc Chantreux @ 2020-01-26 19:27 ` sirgazil 2020-01-26 23:30 ` Arne Babenhauserheide 1 sibling, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread From: sirgazil @ 2020-01-26 19:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marc Chantreux; +Cc: Guile User ---- On Sun, 26 Jan 2020 14:14:59 -0500 Marc Chantreux <mc@unistra.fr> wrote ---- > hello, > > > It's been a while since I designed the current Guile logo. > > my perspective as newcomer: > > * the current logo is splendid > * i feel it fits better with the visual identity of the language > > > What do you think? > > * amazing! but nothing compares to the current one :) > * it would be cool to have λ as an alias to lambda in guile so > we could be able to write > > (λ (x) (* x x)) > > my two cents Ha, ha, Ok. Thanks, Marc :) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: Logo proposal 2020-01-26 19:14 ` Marc Chantreux 2020-01-26 19:27 ` sirgazil @ 2020-01-26 23:30 ` Arne Babenhauserheide 2020-01-27 13:03 ` Marc Chantreux 1 sibling, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread From: Arne Babenhauserheide @ 2020-01-26 23:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: guile-user Marc Chantreux <mc@unistra.fr> writes: > * it would be cool to have λ as an alias to lambda in guile so > we could be able to write > > (λ (x) (* x x)) Did you try it? (spoiler: that’s what I’ve been using for years :-) ) Best wishes, Arne -- Unpolitisch sein heißt politisch sein ohne es zu merken ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: Logo proposal 2020-01-26 23:30 ` Arne Babenhauserheide @ 2020-01-27 13:03 ` Marc Chantreux 2020-01-27 23:33 ` Zelphir Kaltstahl 0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread From: Marc Chantreux @ 2020-01-27 13:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Arne Babenhauserheide; +Cc: guile-user hello, On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 12:30:51AM +0100, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > Did you try it? i never seen λ used in the documentation or code so what i actually wrote a macro: (define-syntax λ (syntax-rules () ((λ sign ...) (lambda sign ...)))) i just removed it and the code is still working. thanks a lot. marc ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: Logo proposal 2020-01-27 13:03 ` Marc Chantreux @ 2020-01-27 23:33 ` Zelphir Kaltstahl 2020-01-28 0:44 ` Jose A. Ortega Ruiz 2020-01-28 1:06 ` Mikhail Kryshen 0 siblings, 2 replies; 19+ messages in thread From: Zelphir Kaltstahl @ 2020-01-27 23:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: guile-user On 1/27/20 2:03 PM, Marc Chantreux wrote: > hello, > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 12:30:51AM +0100, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: >> Did you try it? > i never seen λ used in the documentation or code so what i actually > wrote a macro: > (define-syntax λ > (syntax-rules () > ((λ sign ...) > (lambda sign ...)))) > > i just removed it and the code is still working. thanks a lot. > > marc > The thing is, it does not work in Geiser in Emacs. It does work in normal program code, but if you use the REPL all the time, it becomes annoying. It looks very neat though. Regards, Zelphir ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: Logo proposal 2020-01-27 23:33 ` Zelphir Kaltstahl @ 2020-01-28 0:44 ` Jose A. Ortega Ruiz 2020-01-28 20:40 ` Zelphir Kaltstahl 2020-01-28 1:06 ` Mikhail Kryshen 1 sibling, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread From: Jose A. Ortega Ruiz @ 2020-01-28 0:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: guile-user On Tue, Jan 28 2020, Zelphir Kaltstahl wrote: > On 1/27/20 2:03 PM, Marc Chantreux wrote: >> hello, >> >> On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 12:30:51AM +0100, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: >>> Did you try it? >> i never seen λ used in the documentation or code so what i actually >> wrote a macro: >> (define-syntax λ >> (syntax-rules () >> ((λ sign ...) >> (lambda sign ...)))) >> >> i just removed it and the code is still working. thanks a lot. >> >> marc >> > The thing is, it does not work in Geiser in Emacs. Hmm, it does work for me. For instance, this simple example (define-module (foo)) (define foo (λ () 3)) in foo.scm does what i expect. Also using λ directly in the REPL works for me. What behaviour are you observing instead? Could it be that you're not using UTF-8 as your encoding? Cheers, jao -- "Light thinks it travels faster than anything but it is wrong. No matter how fast light travels it finds the darkness has always got there first, and is waiting for it." -Terry Pratchett, Reaper Man ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: Logo proposal 2020-01-28 0:44 ` Jose A. Ortega Ruiz @ 2020-01-28 20:40 ` Zelphir Kaltstahl 0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread From: Zelphir Kaltstahl @ 2020-01-28 20:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: guile-user Hmmm, I tried again and it worked in command line REPL and Geiser. Weird, I was remembering something did not work. Perhaps it was only when I needed lambda* or something. Great, I can use it more often again! On 1/28/20 1:44 AM, Jose A. Ortega Ruiz wrote: > On Tue, Jan 28 2020, Zelphir Kaltstahl wrote: > >> On 1/27/20 2:03 PM, Marc Chantreux wrote: >>> hello, >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 12:30:51AM +0100, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: >>>> Did you try it? >>> i never seen λ used in the documentation or code so what i actually >>> wrote a macro: >>> (define-syntax λ >>> (syntax-rules () >>> ((λ sign ...) >>> (lambda sign ...)))) >>> >>> i just removed it and the code is still working. thanks a lot. >>> >>> marc >>> >> The thing is, it does not work in Geiser in Emacs. > Hmm, it does work for me. For instance, this simple example > > (define-module (foo)) > > (define foo (λ () 3)) > > in foo.scm does what i expect. Also using λ directly in the REPL works > for me. What behaviour are you observing instead? Could it be that > you're not using UTF-8 as your encoding? > > Cheers, > jao ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: Logo proposal 2020-01-27 23:33 ` Zelphir Kaltstahl 2020-01-28 0:44 ` Jose A. Ortega Ruiz @ 2020-01-28 1:06 ` Mikhail Kryshen 2020-01-28 3:06 ` Jose A. Ortega Ruiz 1 sibling, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread From: Mikhail Kryshen @ 2020-01-28 1:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Zelphir Kaltstahl, guile-user [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1111 bytes --] Zelphir Kaltstahl <zelphirkaltstahl@posteo.de> writes: > On 1/27/20 2:03 PM, Marc Chantreux wrote: >> hello, >> >> On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 12:30:51AM +0100, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: >>> Did you try it? >> i never seen λ used in the documentation or code so what i actually >> wrote a macro: >> (define-syntax λ >> (syntax-rules () >> ((λ sign ...) >> (lambda sign ...)))) >> >> i just removed it and the code is still working. thanks a lot. >> >> marc >> > The thing is, it does not work in Geiser in Emacs. > > It does work in normal program code, but if you use the REPL all the > time, it becomes annoying. It looks very neat though. Add this to your ~/.emacs and you should be able to use "C-c \" to insert λ in Geiser REPL like in normal Scheme buffer: (add-hook 'geiser-repl-mode-hook (lambda () (require 'geiser-mode) (define-key geiser-repl-mode-map "\C-c\\" 'geiser-insert-lambda))) It's strange though, that geiser-mode has this binding by default, but geser-repl-mode does not. -- Mikhail [-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 658 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: Logo proposal 2020-01-28 1:06 ` Mikhail Kryshen @ 2020-01-28 3:06 ` Jose A. Ortega Ruiz 0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread From: Jose A. Ortega Ruiz @ 2020-01-28 3:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: guile-user On Tue, Jan 28 2020, Mikhail Kryshen wrote: [...] > It's strange though, that geiser-mode has this binding by default, but > geser-repl-mode does not. Indeed. I've added both C-c \ and C-c [ to the repl shortcuts (with the usual alternatives C-c C-\ and C-c C-[). It should be available in MELPA unstable when they update next. Thanks for the suggestion! (BTW, C-u C-c \ will insert (λ ())). Cheers, jao -- It is a truism of escape plans that the problem with going anywhere is that you take yourself with you -- Emma Brockes ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: Logo proposal 2020-01-26 16:59 Logo proposal sirgazil 2020-01-26 19:14 ` Marc Chantreux @ 2020-01-26 22:47 ` John Cowan 2020-01-27 12:58 ` sirgazil 2020-01-30 3:57 ` Maxim Cournoyer 2020-01-28 9:26 ` Ludovic Courtès 2 siblings, 2 replies; 19+ messages in thread From: John Cowan @ 2020-01-26 22:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: sirgazil; +Cc: Guile User On Sun, Jan 26, 2020 at 12:02 PM sirgazil <sirgazil@zoho.com> wrote: https://multimedialib.files.wordpress.com/2020/01/guile-logo-proposal-2020-01-24.png > > Personally, I like the one with the single lambda. > > > What do you think? > As I mentioned on IRC, my favorites are the 3rd row on the left (red lambda, white background) and the 1st row on the right (yellow lambda, black background. I think the four-lambda versions are too busy, and the two I mentioned obey the heraldic "rules of tincture", which were designed to make a knight's shield or a flag maximally visible. ObDetails: The rules divide the different tinctures (colors) into two groups: the "metals" yellow and white, and the "colors", everything else, and state that two metals cannot be adjacent, nor can two colors. Thus both black (a color) letters on white (a metal) and white letters on black print are fine. So are the red lambda on the white background and the gold lambda on the metal background. But the gold lambda on the white background is metal-on-metal, and the red lambda on the black background is color-on-color. These rules are by no means obsolete: they govern the design of flags and traffic signs to this day. There are exceptions: the U.S. flag has color-on-color where the top four red stripes touch the blue quadrant, but this is considered only a minor violation that doesn't affect visibility. Likewise one version of the arms of God (as invented by early modern heralds) uses only yellow and white, but hey, it's not like anyone will bear *those* arms into battle. Finally, when something on a shield is shown in its natural colors, the rules of tincture can be broken, as in the arms of the Devil: "gules a fess Or between three frogs proper", where the (green) frogs can appear on the red background. John Cowan http://vrici.lojban.org/~cowan cowan@ccil.org A poetical purist named Cowan [that's me] Once put the rest of us dowan. [on xml-dev] "Your verse would be sweeter / If it only had metre And rhymes that didn't force me to frowan." [overpacked line!] --Michael Kay > > > --- > https://sirgazil.bitbucket.io/ > > > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: Logo proposal 2020-01-26 22:47 ` John Cowan @ 2020-01-27 12:58 ` sirgazil 2020-01-30 3:57 ` Maxim Cournoyer 1 sibling, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread From: sirgazil @ 2020-01-27 12:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: John Cowan; +Cc: Guile User ---- On Sun, 26 Jan 2020 17:47:16 -0500 John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org> wrote ---- > > > On Sun, Jan 26, 2020 at 12:02 PM sirgazil <sirgazil@zoho.com> wrote: > > https://multimedialib.files.wordpress.com/2020/01/guile-logo-proposal-2020-01-24.png > > Personally, I like the one with the single lambda. > > > What do you think? > As I mentioned on IRC, my favorites are the 3rd row on the left (red lambda, white background) and the 1st row on the right (yellow lambda, black background. I think the four-lambda versions are too busy, and the two I mentioned obey the heraldic "rules of tincture", which were designed to make a knight's shield or a flag maximally visible. > ObDetails: The rules divide the different tinctures (colors) into two groups: the "metals" yellow and white, and the "colors", everything else, and state that two metals cannot be adjacent, nor can two colors. Thus both black (a color) letters on white (a metal) and white letters on black print are fine. So are the red lambda on the white background and the gold lambda on the metal background. But the gold lambda on the white background is metal-on-metal, and the red lambda on the black background is color-on-color. These rules are by no means obsolete: they govern the design of flags and traffic signs to this day. Thanks for commenting, John, and for the information (I had no idea about that). ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: Logo proposal 2020-01-26 22:47 ` John Cowan 2020-01-27 12:58 ` sirgazil @ 2020-01-30 3:57 ` Maxim Cournoyer 2020-01-31 16:05 ` sirgazil 1 sibling, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread From: Maxim Cournoyer @ 2020-01-30 3:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: John Cowan; +Cc: Guile User Hello, John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org> writes: > On Sun, Jan 26, 2020 at 12:02 PM sirgazil <sirgazil@zoho.com> wrote: > > https://multimedialib.files.wordpress.com/2020/01/guile-logo-proposal-2020-01-24.png >> >> Personally, I like the one with the single lambda. >> >> >> What do you think? >> > > As I mentioned on IRC, my favorites are the 3rd row on the left (red > lambda, white background) and the 1st row on the right (yellow lambda, > black background. I think the four-lambda versions are too busy, and the > two I mentioned obey the heraldic "rules of tincture", which were designed > to make a knight's shield or a flag maximally visible. My preferences are in agreement with those of John. Those are easy on the eyes and simple (pure). Thank you for the great designs! Maxim ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: Logo proposal 2020-01-30 3:57 ` Maxim Cournoyer @ 2020-01-31 16:05 ` sirgazil 0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread From: sirgazil @ 2020-01-31 16:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Maxim Cournoyer; +Cc: John Cowan, Guile User Linus, Maxim, hello, ---- On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 22:57:43 -0500 Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> wrote ---- > Hello, > > John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org> writes: > > > On Sun, Jan 26, 2020 at 12:02 PM sirgazil <sirgazil@zoho.com> wrote: > > > > https://multimedialib.files.wordpress.com/2020/01/guile-logo-proposal-2020-01-24.png > >> > >> Personally, I like the one with the single lambda. > >> > >> > >> What do you think? > >> > > > > As I mentioned on IRC, my favorites are the 3rd row on the left (red > > lambda, white background) and the 1st row on the right (yellow lambda, > > black background. I think the four-lambda versions are too busy, and the > > two I mentioned obey the heraldic "rules of tincture", which were designed > > to make a knight's shield or a flag maximally visible. > > My preferences are in agreement with those of John. Those are easy on > the eyes and simple (pure). > > Thank you for the great designs! Actually, I'm withdrawing the proposal. It seems to me that what bothers me about the current logo is not that much of a problem to other people, and that's good. If a logo change can be avoided, it's fine :) Thank you all for your feedback. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: Logo proposal 2020-01-26 16:59 Logo proposal sirgazil 2020-01-26 19:14 ` Marc Chantreux 2020-01-26 22:47 ` John Cowan @ 2020-01-28 9:26 ` Ludovic Courtès 2020-01-28 10:26 ` Jérémy Korwin-Zmijowski ` (2 more replies) 2 siblings, 3 replies; 19+ messages in thread From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2020-01-28 9:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: sirgazil; +Cc: Guile User Hi sirgazil, sirgazil <sirgazil@zoho.com> skribis: > It's been a while since I designed the current Guile logo. This logo has what I called retracted and expanded forms. The former is the G in parenthesis, and the latter is the one in the website header bar. > > I'm fine with the retracted form, I actually like it, but everytime I see the expanded form, the overlapping of shapes bothers me. So I would like to propose two alternative designs: > > https://multimedialib.files.wordpress.com/2020/01/guile-logo-proposal-2020-01-24.png I like the proposals… but I prefer the current one. :-) The way I see it, λ is all too common among functional programming languages and tools. So it’s both a rallying symbol and one that makes your project indistinguishable from others in the same domain. Thanks, Ludo’. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: Logo proposal 2020-01-28 9:26 ` Ludovic Courtès @ 2020-01-28 10:26 ` Jérémy Korwin-Zmijowski 2020-01-28 14:20 ` sirgazil 2020-01-28 14:18 ` sirgazil 2020-02-05 19:38 ` Christopher Lemmer Webber 2 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread From: Jérémy Korwin-Zmijowski @ 2020-01-28 10:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: guile-user, Ludovic Courtès, sirgazil; +Cc: Guile User Hi Sirgazil, I kind of really like the actual logo ! More than your propositions. Thank you, Jeko Le 28 janvier 2020 10:26:46 GMT+01:00, "Ludovic Courtès" <ludo@gnu.org> a écrit : >Hi sirgazil, > >sirgazil <sirgazil@zoho.com> skribis: > >> It's been a while since I designed the current Guile logo. This logo >has what I called retracted and expanded forms. The former is the G in >parenthesis, and the latter is the one in the website header bar. >> >> I'm fine with the retracted form, I actually like it, but everytime I >see the expanded form, the overlapping of shapes bothers me. So I would >like to propose two alternative designs: >> >> >https://multimedialib.files.wordpress.com/2020/01/guile-logo-proposal-2020-01-24.png > >I like the proposals… but I prefer the current one. :-) > >The way I see it, λ is all too common among functional programming >languages and tools. So it’s both a rallying symbol and one that makes >your project indistinguishable from others in the same domain. > >Thanks, >Ludo’. -- Envoyé de mon appareil Android avec Courriel K-9 Mail. Veuillez excuser ma brièveté. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: Logo proposal 2020-01-28 10:26 ` Jérémy Korwin-Zmijowski @ 2020-01-28 14:20 ` sirgazil 0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread From: sirgazil @ 2020-01-28 14:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: "Jérémy Korwin-Zmijowski_" Cc: guile-user, "Ludovic Courtès" ---- On Tue, 28 Jan 2020 05:26:01 -0500 Jérémy Korwin-Zmijowski_ <jeremy@korwin-zmijowski.fr> wrote ---- > Hi Sirgazil, > > I kind of really like the actual logo ! More than your propositions. Great, thank you for your feedback, Jérémy :) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: Logo proposal 2020-01-28 9:26 ` Ludovic Courtès 2020-01-28 10:26 ` Jérémy Korwin-Zmijowski @ 2020-01-28 14:18 ` sirgazil 2020-02-05 19:38 ` Christopher Lemmer Webber 2 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread From: sirgazil @ 2020-01-28 14:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: "Ludovic Courtès"; +Cc: Guile User ---- On Tue, 28 Jan 2020 04:26:46 -0500 Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> wrote ---- > Hi sirgazil, > > sirgazil <sirgazil@zoho.com> skribis: > > > It's been a while since I designed the current Guile logo. This logo has what I called retracted and expanded forms. The former is the G in parenthesis, and the latter is the one in the website header bar. > > > > I'm fine with the retracted form, I actually like it, but everytime I see the expanded form, the overlapping of shapes bothers me. So I would like to propose two alternative designs: > > > > https://multimedialib.files.wordpress.com/2020/01/guile-logo-proposal-2020-01-24.png > > I like the proposals… but I prefer the current one. :-) > > The way I see it, λ is all too common among functional programming > languages and tools. So it’s both a rallying symbol and one that makes > your project indistinguishable from others in the same domain. Ok, thanks for taking a look :) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: Logo proposal 2020-01-28 9:26 ` Ludovic Courtès 2020-01-28 10:26 ` Jérémy Korwin-Zmijowski 2020-01-28 14:18 ` sirgazil @ 2020-02-05 19:38 ` Christopher Lemmer Webber 2 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread From: Christopher Lemmer Webber @ 2020-02-05 19:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: guile-user Ludovic Courtès writes: > Hi sirgazil, > > sirgazil <sirgazil@zoho.com> skribis: > >> It's been a while since I designed the current Guile logo. This logo has what I called retracted and expanded forms. The former is the G in parenthesis, and the latter is the one in the website header bar. >> >> I'm fine with the retracted form, I actually like it, but everytime I see the expanded form, the overlapping of shapes bothers me. So I would like to propose two alternative designs: >> >> https://multimedialib.files.wordpress.com/2020/01/guile-logo-proposal-2020-01-24.png > > I like the proposals… but I prefer the current one. :-) > > The way I see it, λ is all too common among functional programming > languages and tools. So it’s both a rallying symbol and one that makes > your project indistinguishable from others in the same domain. > > Thanks, > Ludo’. I agree. I thought the current Guile logo looks very nice and distinct and lisp'y. These days lispiness is a more defining feature than lambdaness, and less advertised. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-02-05 19:38 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 19+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2020-01-26 16:59 Logo proposal sirgazil 2020-01-26 19:14 ` Marc Chantreux 2020-01-26 19:27 ` sirgazil 2020-01-26 23:30 ` Arne Babenhauserheide 2020-01-27 13:03 ` Marc Chantreux 2020-01-27 23:33 ` Zelphir Kaltstahl 2020-01-28 0:44 ` Jose A. Ortega Ruiz 2020-01-28 20:40 ` Zelphir Kaltstahl 2020-01-28 1:06 ` Mikhail Kryshen 2020-01-28 3:06 ` Jose A. Ortega Ruiz 2020-01-26 22:47 ` John Cowan 2020-01-27 12:58 ` sirgazil 2020-01-30 3:57 ` Maxim Cournoyer 2020-01-31 16:05 ` sirgazil 2020-01-28 9:26 ` Ludovic Courtès 2020-01-28 10:26 ` Jérémy Korwin-Zmijowski 2020-01-28 14:20 ` sirgazil 2020-01-28 14:18 ` sirgazil 2020-02-05 19:38 ` Christopher Lemmer Webber
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).