From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=E9r=E9my_Korwin-Zmijowski?= Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Logo proposal Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2020 11:26:01 +0100 Message-ID: References: <16fe2cb2c6e.d75f3b0a40662.3318275155991395144@zoho.com> <87ftg0j5ih.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="106251"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android Cc: Guile User To: guile-user@gnu.org, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ludovic_Court=E8s?= , sirgazil Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 28 11:26:23 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iwO4d-000Rc9-9y for guile-user@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 11:26:23 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56466 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iwO4c-0003O2-GZ for guile-user@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 05:26:22 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46172) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iwO4R-0003NE-0Z for guile-user@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 05:26:12 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iwO4P-0002S9-Ms for guile-user@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 05:26:10 -0500 Original-Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]:56961) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iwO4P-0002RA-DK; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 05:26:09 -0500 X-Originating-IP: 37.164.251.48 Original-Received: from [10.145.13.40] (unknown [37.164.251.48]) (Authenticated sender: jeremy@korwin-zmijowski.fr) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 52260E0017; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 10:26:03 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <87ftg0j5ih.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 217.70.183.196 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "guile-user" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.lisp.guile.user:16110 Archived-At: Hi Sirgazil,=20 I kind of really like the actual logo ! More than your propositions=2E=20 Thank you, Jeko Le 28 janvier 2020 10:26:46 GMT+01:00, "Ludovic Court=C3=A8s" a =C3=A9crit : >Hi sirgazil, > >sirgazil skribis: > >> It's been a while since I designed the current Guile logo=2E This logo >has what I called retracted and expanded forms=2E The former is the G in >parenthesis, and the latter is the one in the website header bar=2E >> >> I'm fine with the retracted form, I actually like it, but everytime I >see the expanded form, the overlapping of shapes bothers me=2E So I would >like to propose two alternative designs: >> >> >https://multimedialib=2Efiles=2Ewordpress=2Ecom/2020/01/guile-logo-propos= al-2020-01-24=2Epng > >I like the proposals=E2=80=A6 but I prefer the current one=2E :-) > >The way I see it, =CE=BB is all too common among functional programming >languages and tools=2E So it=E2=80=99s both a rallying symbol and one th= at makes >your project indistinguishable from others in the same domain=2E > >Thanks, >Ludo=E2=80=99=2E --=20 Envoy=C3=A9 de mon appareil Android avec Courriel K-9 Mail=2E Veuillez exc= user ma bri=C3=A8vet=C3=A9=2E