From: "Aleix Conchillo Flaqué" <aconchillo@gmail.com>
To: Maxime Devos <maximedevos@telenet.be>
Cc: guile-devel <guile-devel@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] web: send capitalized authorization header scheme
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2022 09:35:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+XASoUNMX2Hm5ZBgQ+ur69eheaqwg6M7xn3Kem3=M6kNQNWGw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <69b3c07c82a6c48064439f4179f0861e601decf0.camel@telenet.be>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1478 bytes --]
On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 9:28 AM Maxime Devos <maximedevos@telenet.be> wrote:
> Aleix Conchillo Flaqué schreef op vr 24-06-2022 om 09:05 [-0700]:
> > * module/web/http.scm (write-credentials): capitalize authorization
> > header scheme. The standard allows the scheme to be case-insensitive,
> > however most libraries out there expect the scheme to be capitalized,
> > which is what it is actually used in RFC
> > docs (e.g. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7617#section-2).
> Some
> > libraries even reject lowercase scheme making Guile incompatible.
>
> This comment looks more useful to me to put in the source code, to help
> future readers of the source code, otherwise they would have to dig
> through the git history. As mentioned previously, this could be
> something like:
>
> ;; While according to RFC 7617 Schemes are case-insensitive:
> ;;
> ;; ‘Note that both scheme and parameter names are matched
> ;; case-insensitive’
> ;;
> ;; some software (*) incorrectly assumes title case for scheme
> ;; names, so use the more titlecase.
> ;;
> ;; (*): See, e.g.,
> ;; <https://[bug report 1]/>
> ;; <https://[bug report 2]/>
>
> which would also address the issue of not forgetting that Guile's old
> behaviour is correct, it's the other party that's not following the
> specification.
>
>
This makes sense. I left the comment in the commit log as well. Sent again.
Thank you!
Aleix
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2496 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-24 16:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-24 16:05 [PATCH] web: send capitalized authorization header scheme Aleix Conchillo Flaqué
2022-06-24 16:28 ` Maxime Devos
2022-06-24 16:35 ` Aleix Conchillo Flaqué [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-06-24 16:34 Aleix Conchillo Flaqué
2022-06-24 19:51 ` Maxime Devos
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CA+XASoUNMX2Hm5ZBgQ+ur69eheaqwg6M7xn3Kem3=M6kNQNWGw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=aconchillo@gmail.com \
--cc=guile-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=maximedevos@telenet.be \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).