From: "Aleix Conchillo Flaqué" <aconchillo@gmail.com>
To: Maxime Devos <maximedevos@telenet.be>
Cc: guile-devel <guile-devel@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] web: authorization header scheme should be capitalized
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2022 06:41:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+XASoU7Ouh9DLD=u=TPGRfJt_0XONNC04EoSM0yWY0e_p93tA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <32d2790b6941f5bf5b9185bd1fc9f46d90fcc85e.camel@telenet.be>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 971 bytes --]
On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 1:35 AM Maxime Devos <maximedevos@telenet.be> wrote:
> Aleix Conchillo Flaqué schreef op do 23-06-2022 om 18:46 [-0700]:
> > Ah, got it. Yes, that would make sense.
> >
> > I was thinking about it again. I know that Guile complies with the
> > standard but since, I would say, capitalized schemes is what most
> > libraries use, would it make sense to switch to that? I don't really
> > expect big companies to fix this kind of stuff fast and in the
> > meantime we can't use Guile for certain things. I have to say I've
> > never seen lowercase Authorization header schemes.
>
> As long as we remember to _also_ report the bug in the buggy
> ‘consumers’ of the header (in this case, those big companies) and
> remember that lower-case isn't buggy, switching to the more
> conventional title-case seems sensible to me.
>
>
Great. I'll re-word the patch then and add your suggested additional tests.
Thank you!
Aleix
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1843 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-24 13:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-23 20:27 [PATCH] web: authorization header scheme should be capitalized Aleix Conchillo Flaqué
2022-06-23 20:33 ` Aleix Conchillo Flaqué
2022-06-23 20:40 ` Maxime Devos
2022-06-23 20:42 ` Aleix Conchillo Flaqué
2022-06-23 20:45 ` Maxime Devos
2022-06-23 21:13 ` Aleix Conchillo Flaqué
2022-06-23 22:20 ` Maxime Devos
2022-06-24 1:46 ` Aleix Conchillo Flaqué
2022-06-24 8:35 ` Maxime Devos
2022-06-24 13:41 ` Aleix Conchillo Flaqué [this message]
2022-06-24 12:16 ` Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-06-23 19:15 Aleix Conchillo Flaqué
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CA+XASoU7Ouh9DLD=u=TPGRfJt_0XONNC04EoSM0yWY0e_p93tA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=aconchillo@gmail.com \
--cc=guile-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=maximedevos@telenet.be \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).