From: Dave Love <d.love@dl.ac.uk>
Cc: handa@etl.go.jp, monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu,
keichwa@gmx.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Several serious problems
Date: 04 Sep 2002 18:21:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <rzqlm6hacwc.fsf@albion.dl.ac.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: E17kezt-0008Kd-00@fencepost.gnu.org
Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> writes:
> We would not have installed your changes in the trunk if they were
> harmful.
I was referring to what people have been told about them, including in
PROBLEMS.
[I'm not sure you'd actually know a priori whether what I installed
was harmful; it wasn't properly tested. Obviously I think it's OK
modulo the bugs I haven't heard about, but that doesn't mean it
couldn't corrupt data.]
> The issue about RC is not harm, it is risk of bugs. Any
> change has a risk of bugs, even if it is a great improvement.
Of course, and I'm surprised at some of what's been added.
> But the risk is not proportional to the improvement; they depend on
> different factors. In RC we try to keep this risk down.
Of course. I happen to be in the best position to evaluate the
factors in this case.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-09-04 17:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 105+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-08-19 7:48 Several serious problems Kenichi Handa
2002-08-22 17:08 ` Dave Love
2002-08-29 13:25 ` Kenichi Handa
2002-08-29 17:32 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-08-29 23:15 ` Dave Love
2002-08-30 14:36 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-09-04 17:23 ` Dave Love
2002-08-30 6:09 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-31 17:30 ` Dave Love
2002-09-02 0:01 ` Richard Stallman
2002-09-04 17:15 ` Dave Love
2002-09-08 12:54 ` Richard Stallman
2002-09-12 22:38 ` Dave Love
2002-09-13 19:34 ` Richard Stallman
2002-09-25 7:01 ` status of utf-8.el, etc [Re: Several serious problems] Kenichi Handa
2002-09-25 14:35 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-09-25 23:47 ` Kenichi Handa
2002-09-26 13:56 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-09-27 13:22 ` Kenichi Handa
2002-09-28 3:19 ` Richard Stallman
2002-09-27 13:59 ` Dave Love
2002-09-27 15:24 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-09-28 3:20 ` Richard Stallman
2002-10-04 22:26 ` Dave Love
2002-10-05 16:59 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-10-11 17:21 ` Dave Love
2002-10-12 8:27 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-09-28 3:19 ` Richard Stallman
2002-09-27 13:55 ` Dave Love
2002-09-28 3:19 ` Richard Stallman
2002-09-30 9:09 ` Kenichi Handa
2002-09-30 13:29 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-10-01 7:37 ` Kenichi Handa
2002-10-01 20:03 ` Richard Stallman
2002-10-10 12:25 ` Kenichi Handa
2002-10-04 22:38 ` Dave Love
2002-10-04 22:32 ` Dave Love
2002-10-09 1:26 ` Kenichi Handa
2002-10-15 17:38 ` Dave Love
2002-10-16 4:38 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-29 23:09 ` Several serious problems Dave Love
2002-08-30 6:11 ` Richard Stallman
2002-09-04 17:21 ` Dave Love [this message]
2002-08-29 23:17 ` Dave Love
2002-08-30 6:11 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-31 17:31 ` Dave Love
2002-09-02 0:01 ` Richard Stallman
2002-09-02 1:28 ` Kenichi Handa
2002-09-05 13:41 ` Dave Love
2002-09-05 23:32 ` Kenichi Handa
2002-09-06 11:38 ` Robert J. Chassell
2002-09-07 23:19 ` Dave Love
2002-09-09 0:21 ` Richard Stallman
2002-09-12 22:43 ` Dave Love
2002-09-26 4:51 ` Kenichi Handa
2002-09-10 16:36 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-30 6:09 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-24 12:11 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-26 13:17 ` Kenichi Handa
2002-08-26 16:15 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-08-29 23:18 ` Dave Love
2002-08-30 14:36 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-08-29 23:19 ` Dave Love
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-07-22 17:11 Richard Stallman
2002-07-22 19:01 ` Andre Spiegel
2002-07-22 19:03 ` Andre Spiegel
2002-07-23 4:00 ` Richard Stallman
2002-07-22 19:03 ` Andreas Schwab
2002-07-23 18:58 ` Richard Stallman
2002-07-22 19:11 ` Andre Spiegel
2002-07-23 4:42 ` Karl Eichwalder
2002-07-24 3:25 ` Richard Stallman
2002-07-24 4:43 ` Karl Eichwalder
2002-07-25 3:12 ` Richard Stallman
2002-07-25 3:24 ` Karl Eichwalder
2002-07-26 15:35 ` Richard Stallman
2002-07-27 3:19 ` Karl Eichwalder
2002-07-29 1:12 ` Richard Stallman
2002-07-29 14:32 ` Karl Eichwalder
2002-07-30 1:00 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-09 7:42 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-08-09 16:08 ` Karl Eichwalder
2002-08-10 17:16 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-12 16:20 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-08-13 1:48 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-15 2:30 ` Karl Eichwalder
2002-08-15 2:47 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-08-15 5:31 ` Karl Eichwalder
2002-08-15 15:30 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-08-15 17:33 ` Dave Love
2002-07-23 13:35 ` Kenichi Handa
2002-07-23 13:52 ` Alan Shutko
2002-07-24 3:25 ` Richard Stallman
2002-07-24 3:25 ` Richard Stallman
2002-07-24 4:37 ` Kenichi Handa
2002-07-25 3:12 ` Richard Stallman
2002-07-25 5:53 ` Miles Bader
2002-07-26 14:29 ` Francesco Potorti`
2002-07-27 18:52 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-09 7:43 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-08-09 7:44 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-08-10 17:16 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-12 0:26 ` Kenichi Handa
2002-08-09 4:41 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-08-15 17:23 ` Dave Love
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=rzqlm6hacwc.fsf@albion.dl.ac.uk \
--to=d.love@dl.ac.uk \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=handa@etl.go.jp \
--cc=keichwa@gmx.net \
--cc=monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).