unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: "Stefan Monnier" <monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu>
Cc: rms@gnu.org, monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu, handa@etl.go.jp,
	emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Several serious problems
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 22:47:38 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200208150247.g7F2ldZ21732@rum.cs.yale.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: shwuqsonu0.fsf@tux.gnu.franken.de

> >     I think we just need to add a call like
> >
> > 	    (load "ucs-tables")
> > 	    (unify-8859-on-encoding-mode 1)
> >
> >     to startup.el (and add ucs-tables.el to the list of files that are
> >     dumped).
> 
> Excuse my ignorance: do you really mean startup.el?

Sorry, I meant loadup.el, of course.

> > Eli, or someone else, can you try this in RC and see how it works?
> 
> ATM, I'm running the appended patch without problems.  I guess, it's a
> know limitation that unification of characters different from the
> latin-1 set, isn't supported by the RC branch?

I'm not sure I understand, but I'm pretty sure it's known ;-)
If you mean that a latin-2 char is not the same as a unicode char
(e.g. for searching purposes), then you just need to use
unify-8859-on-decoding-mode as well.  This can't be the default because
it has a few undesirable side-effects
(harmless for the typical user, but annoying for people working on
some Emacs files such as ucs-*.el where we do want to be able
to talk about the difference between a latin-2 and a unicode char).

> I can unify a-umlaut from latin-2; but unification does not take place
> for characterslike "LATIN SMALL LETTER L WITH STROKE" (x0142).

I don't understand what you mean "the unification does not take place".
Please just explain step by step what you did and what you expected
as if we were terminally stupid (this seems necessary when discussing
such things as unification because it has various different meanings in
the context of the current Mule code and it's too often difficult to
know which one we're talking about).


	Stefan

  reply	other threads:[~2002-08-15  2:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 90+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-07-22 17:11 Several serious problems Richard Stallman
2002-07-22 19:01 ` Andre Spiegel
2002-07-22 19:03 ` Andre Spiegel
2002-07-23  4:00   ` Richard Stallman
2002-07-22 19:03 ` Andreas Schwab
2002-07-23 18:58   ` Richard Stallman
2002-07-22 19:11 ` Andre Spiegel
2002-07-23  4:42 ` Karl Eichwalder
2002-07-24  3:25   ` Richard Stallman
2002-07-24  4:43     ` Karl Eichwalder
2002-07-25  3:12       ` Richard Stallman
2002-07-25  3:24         ` Karl Eichwalder
2002-07-26 15:35           ` Richard Stallman
2002-07-27  3:19             ` Karl Eichwalder
2002-07-29  1:12               ` Richard Stallman
2002-07-29 14:32                 ` Karl Eichwalder
2002-07-30  1:00                   ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-09  7:42               ` Stefan Monnier
2002-08-09 16:08                 ` Karl Eichwalder
2002-08-10 17:16                 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-12 16:20                   ` Stefan Monnier
2002-08-13  1:48                     ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-15  2:30                       ` Karl Eichwalder
2002-08-15  2:47                         ` Stefan Monnier [this message]
2002-08-15  5:31                           ` Karl Eichwalder
2002-08-15 15:30                             ` Stefan Monnier
2002-08-15 17:33                               ` Dave Love
2002-07-23 13:35 ` Kenichi Handa
2002-07-23 13:52   ` Alan Shutko
2002-07-24  3:25     ` Richard Stallman
2002-07-24  3:25   ` Richard Stallman
2002-07-24  4:37     ` Kenichi Handa
2002-07-25  3:12       ` Richard Stallman
2002-07-25  5:53         ` Miles Bader
2002-07-26 14:29         ` Francesco Potorti`
2002-07-27 18:52           ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-09  7:43           ` Stefan Monnier
2002-08-11  1:59         ` unencodable-char-position [Re: Several serious problems] Kenichi Handa
2002-08-12 17:06           ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-12 17:15             ` Stefan Monnier
2002-08-13  0:37               ` Kenichi Handa
2002-08-13 22:47                 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-14  0:20                   ` Kenichi Handa
2002-08-14 23:13                     ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-15 17:51           ` Dave Love
2002-08-19  5:04             ` Kenichi Handa
2002-08-29 22:52               ` Dave Love
2002-08-30  6:53                 ` Andre Spiegel
2002-08-09  7:44       ` Several serious problems Stefan Monnier
2002-08-10 17:16         ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-12  0:26         ` Kenichi Handa
2002-08-09  4:41 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-08-15 17:23   ` Dave Love
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-08-19  7:48 Kenichi Handa
2002-08-22 17:08 ` Dave Love
2002-08-29 13:25   ` Kenichi Handa
2002-08-29 17:32     ` Stefan Monnier
2002-08-29 23:15       ` Dave Love
2002-08-30 14:36         ` Stefan Monnier
2002-09-04 17:23           ` Dave Love
2002-08-30  6:09       ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-31 17:30         ` Dave Love
2002-09-02  0:01           ` Richard Stallman
2002-09-04 17:15             ` Dave Love
2002-09-08 12:54               ` Richard Stallman
2002-09-12 22:38                 ` Dave Love
2002-09-13 19:34                   ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-29 23:09     ` Dave Love
2002-08-30  6:11       ` Richard Stallman
2002-09-04 17:21         ` Dave Love
2002-08-29 23:17     ` Dave Love
2002-08-30  6:11       ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-31 17:31         ` Dave Love
2002-09-02  0:01           ` Richard Stallman
2002-09-02  1:28             ` Kenichi Handa
2002-09-05 13:41               ` Dave Love
2002-09-05 23:32                 ` Kenichi Handa
2002-09-06 11:38                   ` Robert J. Chassell
2002-09-07 23:19                   ` Dave Love
2002-09-09  0:21                     ` Richard Stallman
2002-09-12 22:43                       ` Dave Love
2002-09-26  4:51                     ` Kenichi Handa
2002-09-10 16:36               ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-30  6:09     ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-24 12:11 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-26 13:17   ` Kenichi Handa
2002-08-26 16:15     ` Stefan Monnier
2002-08-29 23:18       ` Dave Love
2002-08-30 14:36         ` Stefan Monnier
2002-08-29 23:19     ` Dave Love

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200208150247.g7F2ldZ21732@rum.cs.yale.edu \
    --to=monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=handa@etl.go.jp \
    --cc=rms@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).