From: Kenichi Handa <handa@etl.go.jp>
Cc: monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu, d.love@dl.ac.uk, rms@gnu.org,
keichwa@gmx.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: status of utf-8.el, etc [Re: Several serious problems]
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 22:22:22 +0900 (JST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200209271322.WAA01306@etlken.m17n.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200209261356.g8QDuTO15360@rum.cs.yale.edu> (monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu)
In article <200209261356.g8QDuTO15360@rum.cs.yale.edu>, "Stefan Monnier" <monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu> writes:
>> In article <200209251435.g8PEZKh10820@rum.cs.yale.edu>, "Stefan Monnier" <monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu> writes:
>> >> (1-1) unify-8859-on-encoding-mode can't be turned off safely.
>> > I still haven't heard of any reason why it should ever be turned off anyway.
>> > I think we should simply get rid of this minor-mode.
>>
>> I tend to agree with getting rid of it. But, I have not yet
>> considered that possibility deeply. If we are going to
>> remove it, I think we should do that in 21.3. Introducing
>> something in 21.3 and remove it in 21.4 is not a good thing.
> But that would make 21.3 into much less of a "bug-fix only" release.
??? Why not adding a new mode in 21.3 makes 21.3 much
less of a bug-fix only release?
> I think we're wasting way too much effort on 21.3. We should get
> it out the door quickly so we can concentrate on getting 21.4 ready.
> Backporting features from 21.4 to 21.3 is not very constructive.
Generally I agree with that we should release 21.3 as soon
as possibility. But, the current codes of RC and HEAD both
have bugs as I wrote previously. Some of them are related
to the new features existing only in HEAD, thus don't exist
in RC.
But, I also noticed that when one toggles
unify-8859-on-decoding-mode on and off,
unify-8859-on-encoding-mode also stops working, both in RC
and HEAD. At least such a bug should be fixed.
This week I think I fixed all bugs related to
unify-8859-on-encoding-mode. I'll try to fix bugs related
to unify-8859-on-decoding-mode this weekend.
---
Ken'ichi HANDA
handa@m17n.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-09-27 13:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-08-19 7:48 Several serious problems Kenichi Handa
2002-08-22 17:08 ` Dave Love
2002-08-29 13:25 ` Kenichi Handa
2002-08-29 17:32 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-08-29 23:15 ` Dave Love
2002-08-30 14:36 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-09-04 17:23 ` Dave Love
2002-08-30 6:09 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-31 17:30 ` Dave Love
2002-09-02 0:01 ` Richard Stallman
2002-09-04 17:15 ` Dave Love
2002-09-08 12:54 ` Richard Stallman
2002-09-12 22:38 ` Dave Love
2002-09-13 19:34 ` Richard Stallman
2002-09-25 7:01 ` status of utf-8.el, etc [Re: Several serious problems] Kenichi Handa
2002-09-25 14:35 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-09-25 23:47 ` Kenichi Handa
2002-09-26 13:56 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-09-27 13:22 ` Kenichi Handa [this message]
2002-09-28 3:19 ` Richard Stallman
2002-09-27 13:59 ` Dave Love
2002-09-27 15:24 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-09-28 3:20 ` Richard Stallman
2002-10-04 22:26 ` Dave Love
2002-10-05 16:59 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-10-11 17:21 ` Dave Love
2002-10-12 8:27 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-09-28 3:19 ` Richard Stallman
2002-09-27 13:55 ` Dave Love
2002-09-28 3:19 ` Richard Stallman
2002-09-30 9:09 ` Kenichi Handa
2002-09-30 13:29 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-10-01 7:37 ` Kenichi Handa
2002-10-01 20:03 ` Richard Stallman
2002-10-10 12:25 ` Kenichi Handa
2002-10-04 22:38 ` Dave Love
2002-10-04 22:32 ` Dave Love
2002-10-09 1:26 ` Kenichi Handa
2002-10-15 17:38 ` Dave Love
2002-10-16 4:38 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-29 23:09 ` Several serious problems Dave Love
2002-08-30 6:11 ` Richard Stallman
2002-09-04 17:21 ` Dave Love
2002-08-29 23:17 ` Dave Love
2002-08-30 6:11 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-31 17:31 ` Dave Love
2002-09-02 0:01 ` Richard Stallman
2002-09-02 1:28 ` Kenichi Handa
2002-09-05 13:41 ` Dave Love
2002-09-05 23:32 ` Kenichi Handa
2002-09-06 11:38 ` Robert J. Chassell
2002-09-07 23:19 ` Dave Love
2002-09-09 0:21 ` Richard Stallman
2002-09-12 22:43 ` Dave Love
2002-09-26 4:51 ` Kenichi Handa
2002-09-10 16:36 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-30 6:09 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-24 12:11 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-26 13:17 ` Kenichi Handa
2002-08-26 16:15 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-08-29 23:18 ` Dave Love
2002-08-30 14:36 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-08-29 23:19 ` Dave Love
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200209271322.WAA01306@etlken.m17n.org \
--to=handa@etl.go.jp \
--cc=d.love@dl.ac.uk \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=keichwa@gmx.net \
--cc=monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu \
--cc=rms@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).