unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
* What is the Emacs "nonportable dumper" catastrophe?
@ 2019-09-10  1:44 Jeffrey Walton
  2019-09-10  2:35 ` Eli Zaretskii
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jeffrey Walton @ 2019-09-10  1:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: emacs-devel

Hi Everyone,

Sorry for the off-topic chatter.

I don't quite follow this comment
(https://retrocomputing.stackexchange.com/questions/12278/what-was-the-first-lisp-compiler#comment38427_12278)
and Google is not being helpful:

    There's never been a LISP compiler. LISP "compilers"
    just dump memory. See the Emacs "nonportable dumper"
    catastrophe that was only fixed in the last couple years.

What is the catastrophe that was fixed?



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: What is the Emacs "nonportable dumper" catastrophe?
  2019-09-10  1:44 What is the Emacs "nonportable dumper" catastrophe? Jeffrey Walton
@ 2019-09-10  2:35 ` Eli Zaretskii
  2019-09-10  3:06   ` Noam Postavsky
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2019-09-10  2:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: noloader; +Cc: emacs-devel

> From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2019 21:44:12 -0400
> 
>     There's never been a LISP compiler. LISP "compilers"
>     just dump memory. See the Emacs "nonportable dumper"
>     catastrophe that was only fixed in the last couple years.
> 
> What is the catastrophe that was fixed?

See the description of portable dumper in NEWS.  The description of
the previous dumping as "catastrophe" is a wild exaggeration, IMNSHO.



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: What is the Emacs "nonportable dumper" catastrophe?
  2019-09-10  2:35 ` Eli Zaretskii
@ 2019-09-10  3:06   ` Noam Postavsky
  2019-09-13  8:16     ` Richard Stallman
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Noam Postavsky @ 2019-09-10  3:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Eli Zaretskii; +Cc: noloader, Emacs developers

On Mon, 9 Sep 2019 at 22:35, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
>
> > From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com>
> > Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2019 21:44:12 -0400
> >
> >     There's never been a LISP compiler. LISP "compilers"
> >     just dump memory. See the Emacs "nonportable dumper"
> >     catastrophe that was only fixed in the last couple years.
> >
> > What is the catastrophe that was fixed?
>
> See the description of portable dumper in NEWS.  The description of
> the previous dumping as "catastrophe" is a wild exaggeration, IMNSHO.

The author of the comment prefixed it with "<troll>", so I guess they
might actually agree with you.



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: What is the Emacs "nonportable dumper" catastrophe?
  2019-09-10  3:06   ` Noam Postavsky
@ 2019-09-13  8:16     ` Richard Stallman
  2019-09-13 12:54       ` Noam Postavsky
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Richard Stallman @ 2019-09-13  8:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Noam Postavsky; +Cc: noloader, eliz, emacs-devel

[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]

  > The author of the comment prefixed it with "<troll>", so I guess they
  > might actually agree with you.

Are you talking about a group of people, or using a plural pronoun for
one person?  That is always a confusing practice, so I wish people
would avoid it.  See
https://stallman.org/articles/genderless-pronouns.html.



-- 
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation (https://gnu.org, https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)





^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: What is the Emacs "nonportable dumper" catastrophe?
  2019-09-13  8:16     ` Richard Stallman
@ 2019-09-13 12:54       ` Noam Postavsky
  2019-09-14  5:33         ` Richard Stallman
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Noam Postavsky @ 2019-09-13 12:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Richard Stallman; +Cc: noloader, Eli Zaretskii, Emacs developers

On Fri, 13 Sep 2019 at 04:16, Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> wrote:

>   > The author of the comment prefixed it with "<troll>", so I guess they
>   > might actually agree with you.
>
> using a plural pronoun for
> one person?  That is always a confusing practice, so I wish people
> would avoid it.  See
> https://stallman.org/articles/genderless-pronouns.html.

I know you prefer "per" for this, but I find that much more confusing
(because it's already a word which means something else, and (since
the reader may assume the non-capitalization is a typo) sometimes a
name (short for "Perry", or, per Wikipedia: "a Scandinavian masculine
given name")).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Per_(given_name)



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: What is the Emacs "nonportable dumper" catastrophe?
  2019-09-13 12:54       ` Noam Postavsky
@ 2019-09-14  5:33         ` Richard Stallman
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Richard Stallman @ 2019-09-14  5:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Noam Postavsky; +Cc: noloader, eliz, emacs-devel

[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]

Just as others are campaigning for singular "them", I am campaigning
for "per".  Many others have told me they find "them" leads to
confusing sentences, sentences which are confusing even though they
know what word it is.

I think you will get used to "per" when you see it more times.


-- 
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation (https://gnu.org, https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)





^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2019-09-14  5:33 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-09-10  1:44 What is the Emacs "nonportable dumper" catastrophe? Jeffrey Walton
2019-09-10  2:35 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-09-10  3:06   ` Noam Postavsky
2019-09-13  8:16     ` Richard Stallman
2019-09-13 12:54       ` Noam Postavsky
2019-09-14  5:33         ` Richard Stallman

Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).