* lazy-lock is obsolete?
@ 2005-03-29 18:34 Stefan Monnier
2005-03-29 20:16 ` Jérôme Marant
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Monnier @ 2005-03-29 18:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
Any objection to moving lazy-lock.el to the obsolete subdirectory?
Stefan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: lazy-lock is obsolete?
2005-03-29 18:34 lazy-lock is obsolete? Stefan Monnier
@ 2005-03-29 20:16 ` Jérôme Marant
2005-03-29 22:26 ` Jason Rumney
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jérôme Marant @ 2005-03-29 20:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
> Any objection to moving lazy-lock.el to the obsolete subdirectory?
Any reason why it should be considered as obsolete? I do use lazy-lock
mode sometimes.
Cheers,
--
Jérôme Marant
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: lazy-lock is obsolete?
2005-03-29 20:16 ` Jérôme Marant
@ 2005-03-29 22:26 ` Jason Rumney
2005-03-30 6:45 ` Jérôme Marant
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jason Rumney @ 2005-03-29 22:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: emacs-devel
Jérôme Marant <jerome.marant@free.fr> writes:
> Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
>
>> Any objection to moving lazy-lock.el to the obsolete subdirectory?
>
> Any reason why it should be considered as obsolete?
jit-lock is supposed to replace it.
> I do use lazy-lock mode sometimes.
Do you use it because jit-lock is insufficient, or just out of habit?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: lazy-lock is obsolete?
2005-03-29 22:26 ` Jason Rumney
@ 2005-03-30 6:45 ` Jérôme Marant
2005-03-31 18:21 ` Richard Stallman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jérôme Marant @ 2005-03-30 6:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
Quoting Jason Rumney <jasonr@gnu.org>:
> Do you use it because jit-lock is insufficient, or just out of habit?
I recalled that I switched from jit to lazy because it seemed to me
that lazy was faster (with 21.3)
Cheers,
--
Jérôme Marant
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: lazy-lock is obsolete?
2005-03-30 6:45 ` Jérôme Marant
@ 2005-03-31 18:21 ` Richard Stallman
2005-04-02 17:41 ` Jérôme Marant
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Richard Stallman @ 2005-03-31 18:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: emacs-devel
I recalled that I switched from jit to lazy because it seemed to me
that lazy was faster (with 21.3)
Could you try them again now, and let's see if lazy-lock is really
faster now? If it is, it would be nice to know why.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: lazy-lock is obsolete?
2005-03-31 18:21 ` Richard Stallman
@ 2005-04-02 17:41 ` Jérôme Marant
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jérôme Marant @ 2005-04-02 17:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> writes:
> I recalled that I switched from jit to lazy because it seemed to me
> that lazy was faster (with 21.3)
>
> Could you try them again now, and let's see if lazy-lock is really
> faster now? If it is, it would be nice to know why.
I can't really see any difference. I don't object for it to be obsoleted.
Cheers,
--
Jérôme Marant
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-04-02 17:41 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-03-29 18:34 lazy-lock is obsolete? Stefan Monnier
2005-03-29 20:16 ` Jérôme Marant
2005-03-29 22:26 ` Jason Rumney
2005-03-30 6:45 ` Jérôme Marant
2005-03-31 18:21 ` Richard Stallman
2005-04-02 17:41 ` Jérôme Marant
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).