From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jason Rumney Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: lazy-lock is obsolete? Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 23:26:15 +0100 Message-ID: References: <8764za5mjn.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <87ekdy1a4d.fsf@marant.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1112136655 31926 80.91.229.2 (29 Mar 2005 22:50:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 22:50:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 30 00:50:51 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DGPXa-0001U0-UO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 00:50:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DGPnx-00082j-Nz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 18:07:25 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DGPkt-0006ON-Co for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 18:04:15 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DGPkq-0006NF-Fj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 18:04:13 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DGPec-0003sU-Ee for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 17:57:46 -0500 Original-Received: from [194.106.33.237] (helo=outmail.freedom2surf.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.34) id 1DGPAO-0003EE-PG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 17:26:33 -0500 Original-Received: from wanchan.jasonrumney.net (i-195-137-77-250.freedom2surf.net [195.137.77.250]) by outmail.freedom2surf.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j2TMQVch013690; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 23:26:31 +0100 Original-Received: from TONKOTSU-RAMEN (tonkotsu-ramen.jasonrumney.net [10.0.0.28]) by wanchan.jasonrumney.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B325DDF10; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 23:26:30 +0100 (BST) Original-To: =?iso-8859-1?q?J=E9r=F4me_Marant?= In-Reply-To: <87ekdy1a4d.fsf@marant.org> ( =?iso-8859-1?q?J=E9r=F4me_Marant's_message_of?= "Tue, 29 Mar 2005 22:16:02 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (windows-nt) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:35333 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:35333 J=E9r=F4me Marant writes: > Stefan Monnier writes: > >> Any objection to moving lazy-lock.el to the obsolete subdirectory? > > Any reason why it should be considered as obsolete? jit-lock is supposed to replace it. > I do use lazy-lock mode sometimes. Do you use it because jit-lock is insufficient, or just out of habit?