From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?iso-8859-15?q?J=E9r=F4me_Marant?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: lazy-lock is obsolete? Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 22:16:02 +0200 Message-ID: <87ekdy1a4d.fsf@marant.org> References: <8764za5mjn.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1112127689 4470 80.91.229.2 (29 Mar 2005 20:21:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 20:21:29 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 29 22:21:24 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DGNCv-000408-Iv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 22:21:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DGNTG-0001dp-Mu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 15:37:54 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DGNPg-0007xL-8E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 15:34:12 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DGNPY-0007sh-UO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 15:34:07 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DGNPY-0007rQ-Gu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 15:34:04 -0500 Original-Received: from [213.228.0.44] (helo=postfix3-1.free.fr) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DGN8E-00081o-W6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 15:16:11 -0500 Original-Received: from amboise (unknown [82.227.97.206]) by postfix3-1.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF2EB173548 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 22:16:09 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: by amboise (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C5D352C03E; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 22:16:02 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <8764za5mjn.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (Stefan Monnier's message of "Tue, 29 Mar 2005 13:34:42 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:35324 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:35324 Stefan Monnier writes: > Any objection to moving lazy-lock.el to the obsolete subdirectory? Any reason why it should be considered as obsolete? I do use lazy-lock mode sometimes. Cheers, --=20 J=E9r=F4me Marant