Re: Emacs pretest 28.0.91 is out

[Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com>]

>>>>> On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 16:22:53 +0200, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> said:

    >> From: Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com>
    >> Cc: stefan@marxist.se,  emacs-devel@gnu.org
    >> Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2022 15:15:08 +0100
    >> 
    >> Debugger entered--Lisp error: (error "Can't find Hunspell dictionary with a .aff affix f...")
    >> signal(error ("Can't find Hunspell dictionary with a .aff affix f..."))
    >> error("Can't find Hunspell dictionary with a .aff affix f...")
    >> ispell-find-hunspell-dictionaries()
    >> ispell-set-spellchecker-params()
    >> ispell-valid-dictionary-list()
    >> byte-code("\301\302!\210\301\303!\210\301\304!\210\10\203>\0\305\10!\203>\0\3061\"\0\307
    >> \210\3100\202&\0\210\202>\0\203>\0\311\312 \235\203>\0\313\314..."
    >> [ispell-program-name require ert ispell cl-lib executable-find
    >> (error) ispell-check-version t "british"
    >> ispell-valid-dictionary-list ert-set-test so-long-spelling record
    >> ert-test "Check the spelling in the source code."
    >> #f(compiled-function () #<bytecode 0x63d714e81979f10>) nil :passed
    >> (:unstable)] 10)
    >> load("lisp/so-long-tests/spelling-tests" nil t)
    >> 
    >> This is because I have no hunspell dictionaries at all (and it would
    >> be cleaner to define the test unconditionally, but skip it when
    >> needed, but thatʼs another discussion).

    Eli> So you want to fix this?  I don't mind, but since it's (AFAIU)
    Eli> something specific to your installation, is it important to fix on the
    Eli> release branch?

Iʼm not sure, which is why Iʼm asking you

Although, given that it works fine on GNU/Linux, perhaps let sleeping
tests lie. Who here hasn't pushed a last minute harmless bug fix that
caused problems? :-)

Robert
--