From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Robert Pluim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs pretest 28.0.91 is out Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2022 15:33:56 +0100 Message-ID: <87czkx3twr.fsf@gmail.com> References: <877db65wg4.fsf@gmail.com> <87y23m4awm.fsf@gmail.com> <83o84i6w2j.fsf@gnu.org> <87tuea415m.fsf@gmail.com> <83iluq6rss.fsf@gnu.org> <87pmox4atg.fsf@gmail.com> <83o84h5b69.fsf@gnu.org> <87h7a93us3.fsf@gmail.com> <83lezl58zm.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="6253"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: stefan@marxist.se, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 12 16:31:40 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n7fbA-0001W7-5S for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 12 Jan 2022 16:31:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60408 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n7fb8-0001ya-JZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 12 Jan 2022 10:31:38 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:40788) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n7ehN-00064t-1s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Jan 2022 09:34:01 -0500 Original-Received: from [2a00:1450:4864:20::430] (port=33539 helo=mail-wr1-x430.google.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n7ehL-0000nJ-Fv; Wed, 12 Jan 2022 09:34:00 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-x430.google.com with SMTP id d19so4714597wrb.0; Wed, 12 Jan 2022 06:33:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Hb+KT9OXxO6FiTrMmZurBg0SIucPjyjr+oNP2mEL2jI=; b=R3XhjPbRKh2qlPSRoq2Tld1WUhFTATTKctQ9weX0PP4SMVMK2f0jXb0PvLRz+c/yLs GlL5RqmPom/rWllas1DMNywvwSQyy8I5CycvFtPYyzot3v7lOIptLxmL6i5zGajB//ez 3rqnc0+SMjD2P7WlGoh0128IFeELoDef3rfluW6IN0hcNn5VyU7ARxlI2oMhew7hJHnf L6Pxhpw20jQqa/jfprpqozT+D46r4wlaaFMW8e00ZHofpRETrMbpAk6vCNmX2o9UJfJB EMv3TMVtIH+orS96WXBFQBVNf+Q69udccR6xX+6LQfVMJmhpulD4HQgKRyL4dgJiOYKP 5dKw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Hb+KT9OXxO6FiTrMmZurBg0SIucPjyjr+oNP2mEL2jI=; b=I7xagoDdTag9XfFcYBkVcWLheh85aXoBAmFFvjb/8X9FDxU+V2numn1Akxcgu1ciwb n+NJRbRRFbo1a0gDdUERTgfxeA5SlGp2+qy5Jg2BTwNafJyjZ2lm/TT9j8H9+C/Yma1E 2xfrZzRFIMV7PzoWIueI0PY43s0i1cHaw2kIAhiMvizi7emduVqe7ybg/eWJ3A/bGmRq 1CASPy183I9YWmQnq9amSXenSzxlBlZoGrbT5GyKxrlp4AoytoCIyHJp+PRn3WsamfOy qg4tCxDjwms4Aqk16DhEYI6yvdG+WFBbBMUTtP+a3ZN7MmadaICmqj0WFYiHDckQQCGU HVqA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533Triw5RyLaIyHf01vpIXq1sqaMU6aSDSC2i/DB7L4C5qKn+0B5 AScrJ1RnIhDCJ2zlkHHK1LuVI0ZP6H8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwFdkh8Q/jPMxI93k3aFJ/NabAi1cOy5ZrKgxanhakXXDSKftiB0JD1qH42gAsjhQeDSwLPtA== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:61cc:: with SMTP id q12mr11120wrv.375.1641998037405; Wed, 12 Jan 2022 06:33:57 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from rltb ([2a01:e0a:3f3:fb50:ddcd:23b:139e:fb73]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u17sm48748wrt.37.2022.01.12.06.33.56 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 12 Jan 2022 06:33:56 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83lezl58zm.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 12 Jan 2022 16:22:53 +0200") X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 2a00:1450:4864:20::430 (failed) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::430; envelope-from=rpluim@gmail.com; helo=mail-wr1-x430.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -12 X-Spam_score: -1.3 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:284658 Archived-At: >>>>> On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 16:22:53 +0200, Eli Zaretskii said: >> From: Robert Pluim >> Cc: stefan@marxist.se, emacs-devel@gnu.org >> Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2022 15:15:08 +0100 >>=20 >> Debugger entered--Lisp error: (error "Can't find Hunspell dictionary= with a .aff affix f...") >> signal(error ("Can't find Hunspell dictionary with a .aff affix f...= ")) >> error("Can't find Hunspell dictionary with a .aff affix f...") >> ispell-find-hunspell-dictionaries() >> ispell-set-spellchecker-params() >> ispell-valid-dictionary-list() >> byte-code("\301\302!\210\301\303!\210\301\304!\210\10\203>\0\305\10!= \203>\0\3061\"\0\307 >> \210\3100\202&\0\210\202>\0\203>\0\311\312 \235\203>\0\313\314..." >> [ispell-program-name require ert ispell cl-lib executable-find >> (error) ispell-check-version t "british" >> ispell-valid-dictionary-list ert-set-test so-long-spelling record >> ert-test "Check the spelling in the source code." >> #f(compiled-function () #) nil :passed >> (:unstable)] 10) >> load("lisp/so-long-tests/spelling-tests" nil t) >>=20 >> This is because I have no hunspell dictionaries at all (and it would >> be cleaner to define the test unconditionally, but skip it when >> needed, but that=CA=BCs another discussion). Eli> So you want to fix this? I don't mind, but since it's (AFAIU) Eli> something specific to your installation, is it important to fix on= the Eli> release branch? I=CA=BCm not sure, which is why I=CA=BCm asking you Although, given that it works fine on GNU/Linux, perhaps let sleeping tests lie. Who here hasn't pushed a last minute harmless bug fix that caused problems? :-) Robert --=20