* Handshake: Org-mode + Emacs releases [not found] ` <87txesri12.fsf@gmail.com> @ 2013-12-01 10:30 ` Jambunathan K 2013-12-01 11:13 ` Nicolas Goaziou 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Jambunathan K @ 2013-12-01 10:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Nicolas Goaziou; +Cc: emacs-orgmode, emacs-devel Nicolas Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com> writes: > I have a half baked patch which allows to use export framework to handle > radio tables. I'll try to complete it by the end of the year and propose > it on the ML. I see that you are adding features and doing a very quick iteration. Nothing wrong with it and each sprint has been well-timed and planned. I am a bit apprehensive that (what you think as) essentials MAY get missed in Vanilla Emacs proper. So it would be good if you could communicate with Emacs developers the Org-mode features that you want packed in the upcoming Emacs release. (If this is already communicated, well and good) Stefan was indicating mid-December for the current release. Needless to say, having features bundled as part of pre-test builds would get more beta-testing and coverage. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Handshake: Org-mode + Emacs releases 2013-12-01 10:30 ` Handshake: Org-mode + Emacs releases Jambunathan K @ 2013-12-01 11:13 ` Nicolas Goaziou 2013-12-01 12:03 ` Jambunathan K 2013-12-06 14:27 ` Bastien 0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Nicolas Goaziou @ 2013-12-01 11:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jambunathan K; +Cc: emacs-orgmode, emacs-devel Hello, Jambunathan K <kjambunathan@gmail.com> writes: > I am a bit apprehensive that (what you think as) essentials MAY get > missed in Vanilla Emacs proper. So it would be good if you could > communicate with Emacs developers the Org-mode features that you want > packed in the upcoming Emacs release. (If this is already communicated, > well and good) I am no maintainer so I cannot tell which Org revision should be merged with Emacs. FWIW, considering the 15 days time frame we have, I think 8.2.3 family is stable enough (modulo some features that might be cherry picked from master) and would be the obvious safe choice for a quiet end of year. 8.3 release (i.e. built from master) has some interesting features, but may require more work from Org developers during pretest phase. > Stefan was indicating mid-December for the current release. Needless to > say, having features bundled as part of pre-test builds would get more > beta-testing and coverage. That's true. Nevertheless, with the package system, I would say we already have a good coverage at each release. OTOH, I think that Org versions bundled with Emacs should focus on being rock solid. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Handshake: Org-mode + Emacs releases 2013-12-01 11:13 ` Nicolas Goaziou @ 2013-12-01 12:03 ` Jambunathan K 2013-12-06 14:27 ` Bastien 1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Jambunathan K @ 2013-12-01 12:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Nicolas Goaziou; +Cc: emacs-orgmode, emacs-devel Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com> writes: > Hello, > > Jambunathan K <kjambunathan@gmail.com> writes: > >> I am a bit apprehensive that (what you think as) essentials MAY get >> missed in Vanilla Emacs proper. So it would be good if you could >> communicate with Emacs developers the Org-mode features that you want >> packed in the upcoming Emacs release. (If this is already communicated, >> well and good) > > I am no maintainer so I cannot tell which Org revision should be merged > with Emacs. Just to clarify, I was interested in your comments as a developer who is in-charge of org-element and ox & Co. Essentially, I was asking a convoluted question about the roadmap for features that you have taken responsibility for vis-a-vis current Emacs release. > (modulo some features that might be cherry picked from master) and > would be the obvious safe choice for a quiet end of year. Ok. I am sure you will work this out with whoever is merging... > FWIW, considering the 15 days time frame we have, I think 8.2.3 family > is stable enough > 8.3 release (i.e. built from master) has some interesting features, but > may require more work from Org developers during pretest phase. I take your answer to mean that you don't foresee anything substantial to be added to the current feature set. It's possible for you to buy time if you would like to see more feature-lets added or stabilized. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Handshake: Org-mode + Emacs releases 2013-12-01 11:13 ` Nicolas Goaziou 2013-12-01 12:03 ` Jambunathan K @ 2013-12-06 14:27 ` Bastien 1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Bastien @ 2013-12-06 14:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Nicolas Goaziou; +Cc: emacs-orgmode, Jambunathan K, emacs-devel Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com> writes: > FWIW, considering the 15 days time frame we have, I think 8.2.3 family > is stable enough (modulo some features that might be cherry picked from > master) and would be the obvious safe choice for a quiet end of > year. I just released 8.2.4 and merged it with Emacs. We may have time for another merge for 8.2.5. > 8.3 release (i.e. built from master) has some interesting features, but > may require more work from Org developers during pretest phase. Indeed -- let's not rush and let's polish 8.3 outside Emacs for now. -- Bastien ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-12-06 14:27 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <1763930.BASVGl8U4n@linux-j9m3.site>
[not found] ` <5309190.T1LboKNIW4@linux-j9m3.site>
[not found] ` <87txesri12.fsf@gmail.com>
2013-12-01 10:30 ` Handshake: Org-mode + Emacs releases Jambunathan K
2013-12-01 11:13 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2013-12-01 12:03 ` Jambunathan K
2013-12-06 14:27 ` Bastien
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).