From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jambunathan K Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.orgmode Subject: Re: Handshake: Org-mode + Emacs releases Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2013 17:33:04 +0530 Message-ID: <87pppgu6br.fsf@gmail.com> References: <1763930.BASVGl8U4n@linux-j9m3.site> <5309190.T1LboKNIW4@linux-j9m3.site> <87txesri12.fsf@gmail.com> <87wqjouamt.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <87pppgrfh5.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1385899447 13297 80.91.229.3 (1 Dec 2013 12:04:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2013 12:04:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Nicolas Goaziou Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 01 13:04:12 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Vn5ku-00052d-0q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 01 Dec 2013 13:04:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59312 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vn5kt-0002td-K0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 01 Dec 2013 07:04:07 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58237) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vn5ki-0002r1-BH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Dec 2013 07:04:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vn5kX-0002gZ-MH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Dec 2013 07:03:56 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pd0-x229.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c02::229]:36336) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vn5kX-0002gI-Er; Sun, 01 Dec 2013 07:03:45 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pd0-f169.google.com with SMTP id v10so16399715pde.28 for ; Sun, 01 Dec 2013 04:03:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=a8pNxxLBRwyhOFApTGLErUPo7dt+EHP1Ag0OH91nGgM=; b=SvJ+WwmCGb/1uGQA7iKxBbZ0g5+mV+4ZJ/Ec5+oE95T9/Pw7MMtXfXQatAsxQ+LRKf tGJGiF2TSYNBJz2eEPHZGK7WBMTnagC5WNrkBOUXr1+vojwz8/pKBGWbRj0GZ11rqdSI AD8AhXqjZpP8/vgmJ6rpCYLkifdp4NoNRAZAREDUXoTJ0BoZ0+iwSM4OpASgsXoT7qW5 fxdlFocjNwC7lqb33nZkFon0Xpvw/BVvOv4CX0ad6vYgUJei2we7pqT2OhjYomvxW5Pc 0dX+7oXLcgwyylMQ9ejM+qSsrwF1/myjXlHjoJRWYgQ7yIgg1Dr8YQ2SjK7O4X8PTsYG E3Dg== X-Received: by 10.66.102.39 with SMTP id fl7mr62760876pab.43.1385899424306; Sun, 01 Dec 2013 04:03:44 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from debian-6.05 ([115.242.156.230]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id qv8sm115072736pbc.31.2013.12.01.04.03.41 for (version=TLSv1.1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 01 Dec 2013 04:03:43 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87pppgrfh5.fsf@gmail.com> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of "Sun, 01 Dec 2013 12:13:42 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c02::229 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:165974 gmane.emacs.orgmode:79432 Archived-At: Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Hello, > > Jambunathan K writes: > >> I am a bit apprehensive that (what you think as) essentials MAY get >> missed in Vanilla Emacs proper. So it would be good if you could >> communicate with Emacs developers the Org-mode features that you want >> packed in the upcoming Emacs release. (If this is already communicated, >> well and good) > > I am no maintainer so I cannot tell which Org revision should be merged > with Emacs. Just to clarify, I was interested in your comments as a developer who is in-charge of org-element and ox & Co. Essentially, I was asking a convoluted question about the roadmap for features that you have taken responsibility for vis-a-vis current Emacs release. > (modulo some features that might be cherry picked from master) and > would be the obvious safe choice for a quiet end of year. Ok. I am sure you will work this out with whoever is merging... > FWIW, considering the 15 days time frame we have, I think 8.2.3 family > is stable enough > 8.3 release (i.e. built from master) has some interesting features, but > may require more work from Org developers during pretest phase. I take your answer to mean that you don't foresee anything substantial to be added to the current feature set. It's possible for you to buy time if you would like to see more feature-lets added or stabilized.