From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Philipp Stephani <p.stephani2@gmail.com>
Cc: phst@google.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Don't print "process finished" into the stderr buffer.
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2019 22:09:52 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <83v9z789a7.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAArVCkTfKqs3Ui9L3MDp447rD0J3dUDnZSCm6D=povU-SbZEAQ@mail.gmail.com> (message from Philipp Stephani on Sun, 21 Apr 2019 15:55:54 +0200)
> From: Philipp Stephani <p.stephani2@gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2019 15:55:54 +0200
> Cc: Emacs developers <emacs-devel@gnu.org>, Philipp Stephani <phst@google.com>
>
> > Alternatively, you could use the ‘:stderr’ parameter with a non-‘nil’
> > value in a call to ‘make-process’ (*note make-process: Asynchronous
> > Processes.) to make the destination of the error output separate from
> > the standard output; in that case, Emacs will use pipes for
> > communicating with the subprocess.
>
> That seems rather subtle and even unrelated.
I agree, to seome extent.
> If you don't want to change the behavior, how about at least
> clarifying the documentation? I can install a patch for that.
I didn't yet make up my mind, and would love to hear opinions from
others.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-21 19:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-04 12:02 [PATCH 1/3] Document that 'make-process' mixes the output streams Philipp Stephani
2018-04-04 12:02 ` [PATCH 2/3] Don't print "process finished" into the stderr buffer Philipp Stephani
2018-04-04 13:14 ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-04-07 20:21 ` Philipp Stephani
2018-04-08 13:13 ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-04-10 4:14 ` Stephen Leake
2018-04-10 4:59 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-04-19 19:28 ` Philipp Stephani
2019-04-20 7:30 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-04-21 13:55 ` Philipp Stephani
2019-04-21 19:09 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2019-04-21 20:57 ` Stefan Monnier
2019-04-22 9:37 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-04-22 14:43 ` Stefan Monnier
2019-04-22 15:23 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-04-22 15:45 ` Philipp Stephani
2019-04-22 15:52 ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-04-04 12:02 ` [PATCH 3/3] Inherit process output coding system to stderr process Philipp Stephani
2018-04-04 13:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-04-07 21:12 ` Philipp Stephani
2018-04-08 13:18 ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-04-08 16:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-04-04 13:12 ` [PATCH 1/3] Document that 'make-process' mixes the output streams Eli Zaretskii
2018-04-07 20:18 ` Philipp Stephani
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=83v9z789a7.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=p.stephani2@gmail.com \
--cc=phst@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).