From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Don't print "process finished" into the stderr buffer. Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2019 22:09:52 +0300 Message-ID: <83v9z789a7.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20180404120218.257212-1-phst@google.com> <20180404120218.257212-2-phst@google.com> <834lkr3ygo.fsf@gnu.org> <83lgdxzvs2.fsf@gnu.org> <83imv9b0b0.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="117462"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: phst@google.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Philipp Stephani Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 21 21:10:54 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hIHra-000UQy-CF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 21 Apr 2019 21:10:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56195 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hIHrZ-00076S-BS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 21 Apr 2019 15:10:53 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:50891) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hIHqx-00076C-FS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Apr 2019 15:10:16 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:54550) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hIHqx-0004EC-6h; Sun, 21 Apr 2019 15:10:15 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3527 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hIHqt-0004fT-B4; Sun, 21 Apr 2019 15:10:14 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Philipp Stephani on Sun, 21 Apr 2019 15:55:54 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:235732 Archived-At: > From: Philipp Stephani > Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2019 15:55:54 +0200 > Cc: Emacs developers , Philipp Stephani > > > Alternatively, you could use the ‘:stderr’ parameter with a non-‘nil’ > > value in a call to ‘make-process’ (*note make-process: Asynchronous > > Processes.) to make the destination of the error output separate from > > the standard output; in that case, Emacs will use pipes for > > communicating with the subprocess. > > That seems rather subtle and even unrelated. I agree, to seome extent. > If you don't want to change the behavior, how about at least > clarifying the documentation? I can install a patch for that. I didn't yet make up my mind, and would love to hear opinions from others.