From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Don't print "process finished" into the stderr buffer.
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 12:37:13 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <831s1u8jp2.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <jwvwojnqdqw.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (message from Stefan Monnier on Sun, 21 Apr 2019 16:57:12 -0400)
> From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
> Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2019 16:57:12 -0400
>
> > But Emacs does that for ages, so in Emacs this is veteran behavior of
> > the default sentinel function.
>
> FWIW, I don't much like this behavior and since the stderr case is new
> I think we don't have to inherit this part of the behavior.
By "this behavior" do you mean only the "normal" case, or also the
abnormal termination case, in which case we show the reason of the
abnormal termination?
Philipp's proposal, AFAIU, would remove the notification for stderr
even in the abnormal case, so we will have to rely on the stdout
sentinel to announce the reason. Are we sure no information will be
lost through this assumption, i.e. are we sure both sentinels will
always make the same announcements?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-22 9:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-04 12:02 [PATCH 1/3] Document that 'make-process' mixes the output streams Philipp Stephani
2018-04-04 12:02 ` [PATCH 2/3] Don't print "process finished" into the stderr buffer Philipp Stephani
2018-04-04 13:14 ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-04-07 20:21 ` Philipp Stephani
2018-04-08 13:13 ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-04-10 4:14 ` Stephen Leake
2018-04-10 4:59 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-04-19 19:28 ` Philipp Stephani
2019-04-20 7:30 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-04-21 13:55 ` Philipp Stephani
2019-04-21 19:09 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-04-21 20:57 ` Stefan Monnier
2019-04-22 9:37 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2019-04-22 14:43 ` Stefan Monnier
2019-04-22 15:23 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-04-22 15:45 ` Philipp Stephani
2019-04-22 15:52 ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-04-04 12:02 ` [PATCH 3/3] Inherit process output coding system to stderr process Philipp Stephani
2018-04-04 13:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-04-07 21:12 ` Philipp Stephani
2018-04-08 13:18 ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-04-08 16:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-04-04 13:12 ` [PATCH 1/3] Document that 'make-process' mixes the output streams Eli Zaretskii
2018-04-07 20:18 ` Philipp Stephani
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=831s1u8jp2.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).