unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Nick Roberts <nickrob@snap.net.nz>
Cc: juri@jurta.org, eliz@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Overlay arrow in *compilation* and *grep* buffers
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 13:20:16 +1200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <17031.62800.830705.341458@farnswood.snap.net.nz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1DXRlX-0002PP-DY@fencepost.gnu.org>

Richard Stallman writes:
 > Please install your patch, with Eli's doc string.
 > 
 > Please update etc/NEWS and the Emacs Manual too.

I've comitted these changes. The manual refers to "error messages" but these
can be "warning messages" too. As with compile.el, I've just called them
messages, I guess the correct term would be "diagnostic messages". All
the functions are next-error-* and changing them to next-diagnostic-*
wouldn't be practical. However, I do think it does make the manual unclear.

While debugging these lisp changes with Edebug, I noticed that `g' (top-level)
didn't clear Edebug's arrow. I don't know if this was due to the compilation
buffer having a local value but it doesn't happen on other functions when the
compilation buffer isn't present. It might be cleaner to give compile its
own arrow like GUD and next-error (the source buffer based arrow).

Nick

  reply	other threads:[~2005-05-16  1:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-04-24 10:45 Overlay arrow in *compilation* and *grep* buffers Eli Zaretskii
2005-04-24 18:42 ` Kim F. Storm
2005-04-24 20:04   ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-04-27 13:10     ` Kim F. Storm
2005-04-27 14:39       ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-04-28 11:01       ` Richard Stallman
2005-04-28 19:51         ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-04-28 20:54           ` Nick Roberts
2005-04-29  7:08             ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-04-29  8:52               ` Nick Roberts
2005-05-09 20:55                 ` Juri Linkov
2005-05-10  6:40                   ` David Kastrup
2005-05-12 11:38                   ` Nick Roberts
2005-05-13  1:34                     ` Richard Stallman
2005-05-13  5:03                     ` Juri Linkov
2005-05-13  6:08                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-13  7:18                         ` Nick Roberts
2005-05-13 13:28                           ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-14  0:26                             ` Richard Stallman
2005-05-14  7:17                               ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-14 22:20                                 ` Kim F. Storm
2005-05-15 15:58                                   ` Richard Stallman
2005-05-13 13:02                       ` Nick Roberts
2005-05-14  0:25                         ` Richard Stallman
2005-05-15  2:44                           ` Nick Roberts
2005-05-15  4:12                             ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-15  4:21                             ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-15 22:39                             ` Richard Stallman
2005-05-16  1:20                               ` Nick Roberts [this message]
2005-05-16 19:28                                 ` Richard Stallman
2005-05-16 19:28                                 ` Richard Stallman
2005-05-16 22:16                                   ` Nick Roberts
2005-05-17 13:23                                     ` Richard Stallman
2005-04-29 10:49         ` Nick Roberts
2005-05-07 16:20         ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-07 21:10           ` Kim F. Storm
2005-05-08  0:41             ` Nick Roberts
2005-05-08  4:21               ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-08  5:49                 ` Nick Roberts
2005-05-08 16:12                 ` Richard Stallman
2005-05-08 19:37                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-04-25 16:05 ` Richard Stallman
2005-04-25 16:46   ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-04-26 14:33     ` Richard Stallman
2005-04-28 11:34 ` Nick Roberts
2005-04-28 19:50   ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-04-28 21:16     ` Nick Roberts
2005-04-29 10:15   ` Richard Stallman
2005-04-29 12:19     ` Nick Roberts

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=17031.62800.830705.341458@farnswood.snap.net.nz \
    --to=nickrob@snap.net.nz \
    --cc=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=juri@jurta.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).