unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: juri@jurta.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Overlay arrow in *compilation* and *grep* buffers
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 19:46:19 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <01c549b6$Blat.v2.4$736372e0@zahav.net.il> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1DQ65g-0005hG-Kq@fencepost.gnu.org> (message from Richard Stallman on Mon, 25 Apr 2005 12:05:44 -0400)

> From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
> CC: emacs-devel@gnu.org, juri@jurta.org
> Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 12:05:44 -0400
> 
>     Notice the overlay arrow that covered part of the file name: this is a
>     bug, IMHO.  If we want to have an arrow pointing out the current line,
>     we should indent the buffer text to the right as many columns as the
>     arrow string takes.
> 
> It might be good to do that when overlaying the arrow on a compilation
> error buffer, but it would be a misfeature to do that when overlaying
> the arrow on a program file (which was the original use of the overlay
> arrow).

I was only talking about compilation buffers.  Buffers that visit
program sources tend to have non-zero indentation which makes this
problem almost non-existent.

> I'd probably prefer to turn off the arrow and use just the scrolling,
> for compilation buffers.

I have no problems with that, this is how it worked before the arrow
was introduced.

Btw, if the intent was to highlight the current line in the
compilation buffer, we could do this with a color overlay that spans
the entire line.  This would make the line stand out without obscuring
any of its text.

  reply	other threads:[~2005-04-25 16:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-04-24 10:45 Overlay arrow in *compilation* and *grep* buffers Eli Zaretskii
2005-04-24 18:42 ` Kim F. Storm
2005-04-24 20:04   ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-04-27 13:10     ` Kim F. Storm
2005-04-27 14:39       ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-04-28 11:01       ` Richard Stallman
2005-04-28 19:51         ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-04-28 20:54           ` Nick Roberts
2005-04-29  7:08             ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-04-29  8:52               ` Nick Roberts
2005-05-09 20:55                 ` Juri Linkov
2005-05-10  6:40                   ` David Kastrup
2005-05-12 11:38                   ` Nick Roberts
2005-05-13  1:34                     ` Richard Stallman
2005-05-13  5:03                     ` Juri Linkov
2005-05-13  6:08                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-13  7:18                         ` Nick Roberts
2005-05-13 13:28                           ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-14  0:26                             ` Richard Stallman
2005-05-14  7:17                               ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-14 22:20                                 ` Kim F. Storm
2005-05-15 15:58                                   ` Richard Stallman
2005-05-13 13:02                       ` Nick Roberts
2005-05-14  0:25                         ` Richard Stallman
2005-05-15  2:44                           ` Nick Roberts
2005-05-15  4:12                             ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-15  4:21                             ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-15 22:39                             ` Richard Stallman
2005-05-16  1:20                               ` Nick Roberts
2005-05-16 19:28                                 ` Richard Stallman
2005-05-16 19:28                                 ` Richard Stallman
2005-05-16 22:16                                   ` Nick Roberts
2005-05-17 13:23                                     ` Richard Stallman
2005-04-29 10:49         ` Nick Roberts
2005-05-07 16:20         ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-07 21:10           ` Kim F. Storm
2005-05-08  0:41             ` Nick Roberts
2005-05-08  4:21               ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-08  5:49                 ` Nick Roberts
2005-05-08 16:12                 ` Richard Stallman
2005-05-08 19:37                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-04-25 16:05 ` Richard Stallman
2005-04-25 16:46   ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2005-04-26 14:33     ` Richard Stallman
2005-04-28 11:34 ` Nick Roberts
2005-04-28 19:50   ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-04-28 21:16     ` Nick Roberts
2005-04-29 10:15   ` Richard Stallman
2005-04-29 12:19     ` Nick Roberts

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='01c549b6$Blat.v2.4$736372e0@zahav.net.il' \
    --to=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=juri@jurta.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).