bug#30280: async-shell-command-display-buffer doesn't work anymore

["Basil L. Contovounesios" <contovob@tcd.ie>]

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: 0001-lisp-simple.el-async-shell-command-shell-command-Fix.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 1916 bytes --]

From b5167407b464a13968af600ac3d09f13d52e6d26 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Basil L. Contovounesios" <contovob@tcd.ie>
Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2018 13:52:03 +0000
Subject: * lisp/simple.el (async-shell-command, shell-command): Fix grammar

---
 lisp/simple.el | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lisp/simple.el b/lisp/simple.el
index e2deceb4c2..b7ad6ebd79 100644
--- a/lisp/simple.el
+++ b/lisp/simple.el
@@ -3351,15 +3351,15 @@ async-shell-command
 The output appears in the buffer `*Async Shell Command*'.
 That buffer is in shell mode.
 
-You can configure `async-shell-command-buffer' to specify what to do in
-case when `*Async Shell Command*' buffer is already taken by another
+You can configure `async-shell-command-buffer' to specify what to do
+when the `*Async Shell Command*' buffer is already taken by another
 running shell command.  To run COMMAND without displaying the output
 in a window you can configure `display-buffer-alist' to use the action
 `display-buffer-no-window' for the buffer `*Async Shell Command*'.
 
 In Elisp, you will often be better served by calling `start-process'
-directly, since it offers more control and does not impose the use of a
-shell (with its need to quote arguments)."
+directly, since it offers more control and does not impose the use of
+a shell (with its need to quote arguments)."
   (interactive
    (list
     (read-shell-command "Async shell command: " nil nil
@@ -3428,8 +3428,8 @@ shell-command
 specifies the value of ERROR-BUFFER.
 
 In Elisp, you will often be better served by calling `call-process' or
-`start-process' directly, since it offers more control and does not impose
-the use of a shell (with its need to quote arguments)."
+`start-process' directly, since they offer more control and do not
+impose the use of a shell (with its need to quote arguments)."
 
   (interactive
    (list
-- 
2.15.1


[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 263 bytes --]


Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

>> Thanks, I confirm this is the right thing to do and your patch fixes
>> the reported issue.
>
> Then please push them to the emacs-26 branch, and thanks.

Perhaps I can sneak in the attached doc fixes as well.

-- 
Basil