* bug#55301: 27.2; RFE: Auto-create defcustom for declared minor mode keymap @ 2022-05-07 14:07 Phil Hudson 2022-05-07 15:34 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen 0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: Phil Hudson @ 2022-05-07 14:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 55301 --------- How about if the KEYMAP argument (or the :keymap slot) of `define-minor-mode', if given, planted a `defcustom' form for the keymap, thus automagically making each minor mode keymap a customization option? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* bug#55301: 27.2; RFE: Auto-create defcustom for declared minor mode keymap 2022-05-07 14:07 bug#55301: 27.2; RFE: Auto-create defcustom for declared minor mode keymap Phil Hudson @ 2022-05-07 15:34 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen 2022-05-07 16:49 ` Phil Hudson 0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: Lars Ingebrigtsen @ 2022-05-07 15:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Phil Hudson; +Cc: 55301 Phil Hudson <phil.hudson@iname.com> writes: > How about if the KEYMAP argument (or the :keymap slot) of > `define-minor-mode', if given, planted a `defcustom' form for the > keymap, thus automagically making each minor mode keymap a > customization option? We don't use defcustoms for other mode maps, so I'm not sure why we should for the ones tied to `define-minor-mode'? Am I missing something? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* bug#55301: 27.2; RFE: Auto-create defcustom for declared minor mode keymap 2022-05-07 15:34 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen @ 2022-05-07 16:49 ` Phil Hudson 2022-05-08 11:46 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen 0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: Phil Hudson @ 2022-05-07 16:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Lars Ingebrigtsen; +Cc: 55301 If nobody sees any benefit from the idea, I imagine the best thing is to just close this. On Sat, 7 May 2022 at 16:34, Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> wrote: > > Phil Hudson <phil.hudson@iname.com> writes: > > > How about if the KEYMAP argument (or the :keymap slot) of > > `define-minor-mode', if given, planted a `defcustom' form for the > > keymap, thus automagically making each minor mode keymap a > > customization option? > > We don't use defcustoms for other mode maps, so I'm not sure why we > should for the ones tied to `define-minor-mode'? Am I missing > something? > > -- > (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) > bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* bug#55301: 27.2; RFE: Auto-create defcustom for declared minor mode keymap 2022-05-07 16:49 ` Phil Hudson @ 2022-05-08 11:46 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen 2022-05-08 13:47 ` Phil Hudson 0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: Lars Ingebrigtsen @ 2022-05-08 11:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Phil Hudson; +Cc: 55301 Phil Hudson <phil.hudson@iname.com> writes: > If nobody sees any benefit from the idea, I imagine the best thing is > to just close this. I just don't understand the request -- we don't have a Customize interface for altering keymaps anyway. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* bug#55301: 27.2; RFE: Auto-create defcustom for declared minor mode keymap 2022-05-08 11:46 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen @ 2022-05-08 13:47 ` Phil Hudson 2022-05-09 9:34 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen 0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: Phil Hudson @ 2022-05-08 13:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Lars Ingebrigtsen; +Cc: 55301 Not a built-in one, no, but it is not difficult to construct a composite defcustom. There are plenty of sequence types and a keybinding type to compose with. Perhaps Emacs *should* have a standard built-in keymap defcustom type, but that would be the subject for a separate RFE. What I am proposing is something along the lines of this: when a mode (major or minor, it's strictly irrelevant) declares a keymap, part of the processing of the expansion of the mode definition should include a defcustom enabling the user to customize that keymap using the Customize UI, rather than (only) by writing elisp code. In other words, where foo-mode-map is currently implemented (I assume) using a defvar, that should change to a defcustom. That's really all I'm suggesting: change the defvar (or whatever) to a defcustom. On Sun, 8 May 2022 at 12:46, Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> wrote: > > Phil Hudson <phil.hudson@iname.com> writes: > > > If nobody sees any benefit from the idea, I imagine the best thing is > > to just close this. > > I just don't understand the request -- we don't have a Customize > interface for altering keymaps anyway. > > -- > (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) > bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* bug#55301: 27.2; RFE: Auto-create defcustom for declared minor mode keymap 2022-05-08 13:47 ` Phil Hudson @ 2022-05-09 9:34 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen 2022-05-09 9:52 ` Phil Hudson 2022-05-09 9:55 ` Phil Hudson 0 siblings, 2 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Lars Ingebrigtsen @ 2022-05-09 9:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Phil Hudson; +Cc: 55301 Phil Hudson <phil.hudson@iname.com> writes: > What I am proposing is something along the lines of this: when a mode > (major or minor, it's strictly irrelevant) declares a keymap, part of > the processing of the expansion of the mode definition should include > a defcustom enabling the user to customize that keymap using the > Customize UI, rather than (only) by writing elisp code. In other > words, where foo-mode-map is currently implemented (I assume) using a > defvar, that should change to a defcustom. That's really all I'm > suggesting: change the defvar (or whatever) to a defcustom. Emacs doesn't have a Customize UI to alter keymaps, so changing defvars to defcustom isn't currently useful (because there's no :type that could be used other than `sexp'). It would be possible to create such an UI, of course, but it would work quite differently than all other Customize widgets. I don't think anybody wants to have the entire definitions of keymaps in their .emacs files -- they want to add a keystroke or remove a keystroke or two, and that's it. (And, besides, they want to get new keystrokes that are added to the maps.) But it'd be nice to have; sure. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* bug#55301: 27.2; RFE: Auto-create defcustom for declared minor mode keymap 2022-05-09 9:34 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen @ 2022-05-09 9:52 ` Phil Hudson 2022-05-09 9:54 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen 2022-05-09 9:55 ` Phil Hudson 1 sibling, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: Phil Hudson @ 2022-05-09 9:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Lars Ingebrigtsen; +Cc: 55301 How about ":type '(alist :key-type key-sequence :value-type function)"? On Mon, 9 May 2022 at 10:34, Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> wrote: > > Phil Hudson <phil.hudson@iname.com> writes: > > > What I am proposing is something along the lines of this: when a mode > > (major or minor, it's strictly irrelevant) declares a keymap, part of > > the processing of the expansion of the mode definition should include > > a defcustom enabling the user to customize that keymap using the > > Customize UI, rather than (only) by writing elisp code. In other > > words, where foo-mode-map is currently implemented (I assume) using a > > defvar, that should change to a defcustom. That's really all I'm > > suggesting: change the defvar (or whatever) to a defcustom. > > Emacs doesn't have a Customize UI to alter keymaps, so changing defvars > to defcustom isn't currently useful (because there's no :type that > could be used other than `sexp'). > > It would be possible to create such an UI, of course, but it would work > quite differently than all other Customize widgets. I don't think > anybody wants to have the entire definitions of keymaps in their .emacs > files -- they want to add a keystroke or remove a keystroke or two, and > that's it. (And, besides, they want to get new keystrokes that are > added to the maps.) > > But it'd be nice to have; sure. > > -- > (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) > bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* bug#55301: 27.2; RFE: Auto-create defcustom for declared minor mode keymap 2022-05-09 9:52 ` Phil Hudson @ 2022-05-09 9:54 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen 2022-05-09 10:02 ` Phil Hudson 0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: Lars Ingebrigtsen @ 2022-05-09 9:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Phil Hudson; +Cc: 55301 Phil Hudson <phil.hudson@iname.com> writes: > How about ":type '(alist :key-type key-sequence :value-type function)"? Like I said, that wouldn't be very useful, because people don't want the entire keymap in their .emacs files anyway. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* bug#55301: 27.2; RFE: Auto-create defcustom for declared minor mode keymap 2022-05-09 9:54 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen @ 2022-05-09 10:02 ` Phil Hudson 2022-05-09 13:39 ` Robert Pluim 0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: Phil Hudson @ 2022-05-09 10:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Lars Ingebrigtsen; +Cc: 55301 On Mon, 9 May 2022 at 10:54, Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> wrote: > > Phil Hudson <phil.hudson@iname.com> writes: > > > How about ":type '(alist :key-type key-sequence :value-type function)"? > > Like I said, that wouldn't be very useful, because people don't want the > entire keymap in their .emacs files anyway. Isn't that exactly the right place for declarative personal preferences? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* bug#55301: 27.2; RFE: Auto-create defcustom for declared minor mode keymap 2022-05-09 10:02 ` Phil Hudson @ 2022-05-09 13:39 ` Robert Pluim 2022-05-09 15:04 ` Phil Hudson 0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: Robert Pluim @ 2022-05-09 13:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Phil Hudson; +Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen, 55301 >>>>> On Mon, 9 May 2022 11:02:20 +0100, Phil Hudson <phil.hudson@iname.com> said: Phil> On Mon, 9 May 2022 at 10:54, Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> wrote: >> >> Phil Hudson <phil.hudson@iname.com> writes: >> >> > How about ":type '(alist :key-type key-sequence :value-type function)"? >> >> Like I said, that wouldn't be very useful, because people don't want the >> entire keymap in their .emacs files anyway. Phil> Isn't that exactly the right place for declarative personal preferences? Yes, but if a keymap were a defcustom, then the whole keymap would be in your .emacs, and you would not receive any updates if the keymap definition changed, since that affects the *default* defcustom value. Now if you wanted to define a defcustom type for changing bindings in an existing keymap, thatʼs a different proposition (and we already have define-key, so Iʼm not so sure of the utility). Robert -- ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* bug#55301: 27.2; RFE: Auto-create defcustom for declared minor mode keymap 2022-05-09 13:39 ` Robert Pluim @ 2022-05-09 15:04 ` Phil Hudson 2022-05-17 16:03 ` Phil Hudson 0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: Phil Hudson @ 2022-05-09 15:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Robert Pluim; +Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen, 55301 On Mon, 9 May 2022 at 14:39, Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>>>> On Mon, 9 May 2022 11:02:20 +0100, Phil Hudson <phil.hudson@iname.com> said: > > Phil> Isn't that exactly the right place for declarative personal preferences? > > Yes, but if a keymap were a defcustom, then the whole keymap would be > in your .emacs, and you would not receive any updates if the keymap > definition changed, since that affects the *default* defcustom value. True that, and I had not thought of it, but now that I have, I still don't see it as necessarily confounding. Doesn't the same objection (if it is one) apply to *every* defcustom? Is that not the risk that the user takes when they change any custom option, and the risk that every dev takes when they introduce a defcustom? > Now if you wanted to define a defcustom type for changing bindings in an > existing keymap, thatʼs a different proposition (and we already have > define-key, so Iʼm not so sure of the utility). That is exactly what I (think I) want. The utility is admittedly marginal but perhaps not trivial. It's the difference between a declarative approach, which I take to be intrinsically more accessible and intuitive, especially to non-programmers, versus an imperative one. It's essentially the case for custom options in general. I suppose my maximalist claim would be that mode-defined keymaps are self-evidently customize options that have somehow historically been accidentally overlooked. I'm not entirely convinced myself, though. Maybe we should just let it sit for a while. There's obviously something about it that doesn't *feel* right to people with deeper insight than I have. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* bug#55301: 27.2; RFE: Auto-create defcustom for declared minor mode keymap 2022-05-09 15:04 ` Phil Hudson @ 2022-05-17 16:03 ` Phil Hudson 2022-05-17 16:13 ` Robert Pluim 0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: Phil Hudson @ 2022-05-17 16:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Robert Pluim; +Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen, 55301 So after a week, can I get a clear yes or no on this? Either is fine. On Mon, 9 May 2022 at 16:04, Phil Hudson <phil.hudson@iname.com> wrote: > > On Mon, 9 May 2022 at 14:39, Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > >>>>> On Mon, 9 May 2022 11:02:20 +0100, Phil Hudson <phil.hudson@iname.com> said: > > > > Phil> Isn't that exactly the right place for declarative personal preferences? > > > > Yes, but if a keymap were a defcustom, then the whole keymap would be > > in your .emacs, and you would not receive any updates if the keymap > > definition changed, since that affects the *default* defcustom value. > > True that, and I had not thought of it, but now that I have, I still > don't see it as necessarily confounding. Doesn't the same objection > (if it is one) apply to *every* defcustom? Is that not the risk that > the user takes when they change any custom option, and the risk that > every dev takes when they introduce a defcustom? > > > Now if you wanted to define a defcustom type for changing bindings in an > > existing keymap, thatʼs a different proposition (and we already have > > define-key, so Iʼm not so sure of the utility). > > That is exactly what I (think I) want. The utility is admittedly > marginal but perhaps not trivial. It's the difference between a > declarative approach, which I take to be intrinsically more accessible > and intuitive, especially to non-programmers, versus an imperative > one. It's essentially the case for custom options in general. > > I suppose my maximalist claim would be that mode-defined keymaps are > self-evidently customize options that have somehow historically been > accidentally overlooked. I'm not entirely convinced myself, though. > Maybe we should just let it sit for a while. There's obviously > something about it that doesn't *feel* right to people with deeper > insight than I have. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* bug#55301: 27.2; RFE: Auto-create defcustom for declared minor mode keymap 2022-05-17 16:03 ` Phil Hudson @ 2022-05-17 16:13 ` Robert Pluim 2022-05-17 17:27 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen 0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: Robert Pluim @ 2022-05-17 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Phil Hudson; +Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen, 55301 >>>>> On Tue, 17 May 2022 17:03:07 +0100, Phil Hudson <phil.hudson@iname.com> said: Phil> So after a week, can I get a clear yes or no on this? Either is fine. You mean using customize for keymaps? Iʼd say 'no', but Iʼm not an Emacs maintainer. Robert -- ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* bug#55301: 27.2; RFE: Auto-create defcustom for declared minor mode keymap 2022-05-17 16:13 ` Robert Pluim @ 2022-05-17 17:27 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen 2022-05-18 7:13 ` Robert Pluim 0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: Lars Ingebrigtsen @ 2022-05-17 17:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Robert Pluim; +Cc: 55301, Phil Hudson Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com> writes: > You mean using customize for keymaps? Iʼd say 'no', but Iʼm not an > Emacs maintainer. Yes, adding a defcustom now for keymaps would be pointless. But it'd be nice if a defcustom interface for keymaps existed. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* bug#55301: 27.2; RFE: Auto-create defcustom for declared minor mode keymap 2022-05-17 17:27 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen @ 2022-05-18 7:13 ` Robert Pluim 2022-05-18 10:59 ` Phil Hudson 2022-05-18 11:29 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen 0 siblings, 2 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Robert Pluim @ 2022-05-18 7:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Lars Ingebrigtsen; +Cc: 55301, Phil Hudson >>>>> On Tue, 17 May 2022 19:27:14 +0200, Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> said: Lars> Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com> writes: >> You mean using customize for keymaps? Iʼd say 'no', but Iʼm not an >> Emacs maintainer. Lars> Yes, adding a defcustom now for keymaps would be pointless. Lars> But it'd be nice if a defcustom interface for keymaps existed. Something like this? (defcustom keymap-additions nil "Alist of bindings to add to keymaps at startup. Keys are keymap symbols, values are lists of conses, format (key-binding . command) Where KEY-BINDING is a kbd format key specification, and COMMAND is an Emacs command.") So you could have that be '((fundamental-mode-map . (("C-a" . mark-whole-buffer) ("C-b" . backward-word))) (elisp-mode-map . (("C-a" . mark-defun)))) Robert -- ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* bug#55301: 27.2; RFE: Auto-create defcustom for declared minor mode keymap 2022-05-18 7:13 ` Robert Pluim @ 2022-05-18 10:59 ` Phil Hudson 2022-05-18 11:29 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen 1 sibling, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Phil Hudson @ 2022-05-18 10:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Robert Pluim; +Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen, 55301 On Wed, 18 May 2022 at 08:13, Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>>>> On Tue, 17 May 2022 19:27:14 +0200, Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> said: > > Lars> Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com> writes: > >> You mean using customize for keymaps? Iʼd say 'no', but Iʼm not an > >> Emacs maintainer. > > Lars> Yes, adding a defcustom now for keymaps would be pointless. > > Lars> But it'd be nice if a defcustom interface for keymaps existed. > > Something like this? > > (defcustom keymap-additions nil > "Alist of bindings to add to keymaps at startup. > Keys are keymap symbols, values are lists of conses, format > (key-binding . command) > > Where KEY-BINDING is a kbd format key specification, and COMMAND is an > Emacs command.") > > So you could have that be > > '((fundamental-mode-map . (("C-a" . mark-whole-buffer) > ("C-b" . backward-word))) > (elisp-mode-map . (("C-a" . mark-defun)))) Exactly. It should include :type '(alist :key-type key-sequence :value-type function) as I suggested 9 days ago in this thread. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* bug#55301: 27.2; RFE: Auto-create defcustom for declared minor mode keymap 2022-05-18 7:13 ` Robert Pluim 2022-05-18 10:59 ` Phil Hudson @ 2022-05-18 11:29 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen 2022-05-18 13:39 ` Phil Hudson 2022-05-20 22:32 ` Richard Stallman 1 sibling, 2 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Lars Ingebrigtsen @ 2022-05-18 11:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Robert Pluim; +Cc: 55301, Phil Hudson Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com> writes: > Lars> But it'd be nice if a defcustom interface for keymaps existed. > > Something like this? > > (defcustom keymap-additions nil > "Alist of bindings to add to keymaps at startup. > Keys are keymap symbols, values are lists of conses, format > (key-binding . command) > > Where KEY-BINDING is a kbd format key specification, and COMMAND is an > Emacs command.") > > So you could have that be > > '((fundamental-mode-map . (("C-a" . mark-whole-buffer) > ("C-b" . backward-word))) > (elisp-mode-map . (("C-a" . mark-defun)))) Yes, something like that. But the major work would be to create a sensible widget that allows people to customise the keymap in question. It'd be nice if it displayed a graphical keyboard in a buffer, and you could click on keys to specify what they should output. 😀 Or something simpler, for instance a widget where you ask the user to enter a chord/key stroke, and then prompt what command to bind that to. Or... something else. Many possibilities here. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* bug#55301: 27.2; RFE: Auto-create defcustom for declared minor mode keymap 2022-05-18 11:29 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen @ 2022-05-18 13:39 ` Phil Hudson 2022-05-20 22:32 ` Richard Stallman 1 sibling, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Phil Hudson @ 2022-05-18 13:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Lars Ingebrigtsen; +Cc: Robert Pluim, 55301 On Wed, 18 May 2022 at 12:29, Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> wrote: > > Yes, something like that. But the major work would be to create a > sensible widget that allows people to customise the keymap in question. > It'd be nice if it displayed a graphical keyboard in a buffer, and you > could click on keys to specify what they should output. 😀 > > Or something simpler, for instance a widget where you ask the user to > enter a chord/key stroke, and then prompt what command to bind that to. > Or... something else. Many possibilities here. What excellent ideas! ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* bug#55301: 27.2; RFE: Auto-create defcustom for declared minor mode keymap 2022-05-18 11:29 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen 2022-05-18 13:39 ` Phil Hudson @ 2022-05-20 22:32 ` Richard Stallman 1 sibling, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Richard Stallman @ 2022-05-20 22:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Lars Ingebrigtsen; +Cc: rpluim, 55301, phil.hudson [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] > Yes, something like that. But the major work would be to create a > sensible widget that allows people to customise the keymap in question. > It'd be nice if it displayed a graphical keyboard in a buffer, and you > could click on keys to specify what they should output. 😀 > Or something simpler, for instance a widget where you ask the user to > enter a chord/key stroke, and then prompt what command to bind that to. > Or... something else. Many possibilities here. I like this idea too. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* bug#55301: 27.2; RFE: Auto-create defcustom for declared minor mode keymap 2022-05-09 9:34 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen 2022-05-09 9:52 ` Phil Hudson @ 2022-05-09 9:55 ` Phil Hudson 1 sibling, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Phil Hudson @ 2022-05-09 9:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Lars Ingebrigtsen; +Cc: 55301 On Mon, 9 May 2022 at 10:34, Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> wrote: > > (And, besides, they want to get new keystrokes that are > added to the maps.) Customize does support insertion of new elements in its composite types, of course. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-05-20 22:32 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 20+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2022-05-07 14:07 bug#55301: 27.2; RFE: Auto-create defcustom for declared minor mode keymap Phil Hudson 2022-05-07 15:34 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen 2022-05-07 16:49 ` Phil Hudson 2022-05-08 11:46 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen 2022-05-08 13:47 ` Phil Hudson 2022-05-09 9:34 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen 2022-05-09 9:52 ` Phil Hudson 2022-05-09 9:54 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen 2022-05-09 10:02 ` Phil Hudson 2022-05-09 13:39 ` Robert Pluim 2022-05-09 15:04 ` Phil Hudson 2022-05-17 16:03 ` Phil Hudson 2022-05-17 16:13 ` Robert Pluim 2022-05-17 17:27 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen 2022-05-18 7:13 ` Robert Pluim 2022-05-18 10:59 ` Phil Hudson 2022-05-18 11:29 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen 2022-05-18 13:39 ` Phil Hudson 2022-05-20 22:32 ` Richard Stallman 2022-05-09 9:55 ` Phil Hudson
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).