* org-review is on melpa
@ 2016-09-07 5:49 Alan Schmitt
2016-09-07 6:25 ` Clément Pit--Claudel
2016-09-08 11:02 ` Karl Voit
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Alan Schmitt @ 2016-09-07 5:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-orgmode
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 486 bytes --]
Hello,
After using this for a couple of years, I’ve finally taken the time to
put it on Melpa. Org-review (https://melpa.org/#/org-review) is a set of
functions to maintain review dates for entries, so that you may generate
agenda view of things to review. I use it every Friday during my weekly
review to review projects and single tasks.
Best,
Alan
--
OpenPGP Key ID : 040D0A3B4ED2E5C7
Monthly Athmospheric CO₂, Mauna Loa Obs. 2015-07: 401.31, 2016-07: 404.39
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 454 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: org-review is on melpa
2016-09-07 5:49 org-review is on melpa Alan Schmitt
@ 2016-09-07 6:25 ` Clément Pit--Claudel
2016-09-08 11:02 ` Karl Voit
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Clément Pit--Claudel @ 2016-09-07 6:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-orgmode
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 471 bytes --]
This looks great! Thanks Alan.
On 2016-09-07 01:49, Alan Schmitt wrote:
> Hello,
>
> After using this for a couple of years, I’ve finally taken the time to
> put it on Melpa. Org-review (https://melpa.org/#/org-review) is a set of
> functions to maintain review dates for entries, so that you may generate
> agenda view of things to review. I use it every Friday during my weekly
> review to review projects and single tasks.
>
> Best,
>
> Alan
>
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: org-review is on melpa
2016-09-07 5:49 org-review is on melpa Alan Schmitt
2016-09-07 6:25 ` Clément Pit--Claudel
@ 2016-09-08 11:02 ` Karl Voit
2016-09-09 6:50 ` Alan Schmitt
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Karl Voit @ 2016-09-08 11:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-orgmode
Hallo Alan,
* Alan Schmitt <alan.schmitt@polytechnique.org> wrote:
>
> After using this for a couple of years, I=E2=80=99ve finally taken the time=
> to
> put it on Melpa. Org-review (https://melpa.org/#/org-review) is a set of
> functions to maintain review dates for entries, so that you may generate
> agenda view of things to review. I use it every Friday during my weekly
> review to review projects and single tasks.
I'm not familiar with org-review. I just read the description on the
page mentioned above.
I don't particularly want to discuss this here because I think
that I don't need org-review for now. However, I do think that you
should elaborate on the fact that org-review sounds very similar to
a simple recurring todo. What are the benefits compared to recurring
todos?
--
mail|git|SVN|photos|postings|SMS|phonecalls|RSS|CSV|XML to Org-mode:
> get Memacs from https://github.com/novoid/Memacs <
https://github.com/novoid/extract_pdf_annotations_to_orgmode + more on github
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: org-review is on melpa
2016-09-08 11:02 ` Karl Voit
@ 2016-09-09 6:50 ` Alan Schmitt
2016-09-10 20:12 ` Karl Voit
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Alan Schmitt @ 2016-09-09 6:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Karl Voit; +Cc: Karl Voit, emacs-orgmode
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1436 bytes --]
Hello Karl,
On 2016-09-08 13:02, Karl Voit <devnull@Karl-Voit.at> writes:
> Hallo Alan,
>
> * Alan Schmitt <alan.schmitt@polytechnique.org> wrote:
>>
>> After using this for a couple of years, I=E2=80=99ve finally taken the time=
>> to
>> put it on Melpa. Org-review (https://melpa.org/#/org-review) is a set of
>> functions to maintain review dates for entries, so that you may generate
>> agenda view of things to review. I use it every Friday during my weekly
>> review to review projects and single tasks.
>
> I'm not familiar with org-review. I just read the description on the
> page mentioned above.
>
> I don't particularly want to discuss this here because I think
> that I don't need org-review for now. However, I do think that you
> should elaborate on the fact that org-review sounds very similar to
> a simple recurring todo. What are the benefits compared to recurring
> todos?
One could indeed use recurring todos on tasks like “Review Project A”
and “Review Project B”, but it requires creating such additional tasks
for each project. Org-review lets you attach another timestamp,
different from the Scheduled or Deadline ones which define when the task
has to be done, to schedule reviews of the task or project within the
task or project.
Best,
Alan
--
OpenPGP Key ID : 040D0A3B4ED2E5C7
Monthly Athmospheric CO₂, Mauna Loa Obs. 2015-08: 398.93, 2016-08: 402.25
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 454 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: org-review is on melpa
2016-09-09 6:50 ` Alan Schmitt
@ 2016-09-10 20:12 ` Karl Voit
2016-09-12 7:15 ` Alan Schmitt
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Karl Voit @ 2016-09-10 20:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-orgmode
* Alan Schmitt <alan.schmitt@polytechnique.org> wrote:
> --=-=-=
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Btw, is there a reason that those two lines are not part of the
header?
With my slrn config, it seems to be the case that the two lines are
not taken into account so that your non-ASCII characters are not
rendered correctly:
> On 2016-09-08 13:02, Karl Voit <devnull@Karl-Voit.at> writes:
>
>> Hallo Alan,
>>
>> I don't particularly want to discuss this here because I think
>> that I don't need org-review for now. However, I do think that you
>> should elaborate on the fact that org-review sounds very similar to
>> a simple recurring todo. What are the benefits compared to recurring
>> todos?
>
> One could indeed use recurring todos on tasks like =E2=80=9CReview Project =
> A=E2=80=9D
> and =E2=80=9CReview Project B=E2=80=9D, but it requires creating such addit=
> ional tasks
> for each project. Org-review lets you attach another timestamp,
> different from the Scheduled or Deadline ones which define when the task
> has to be done, to schedule reviews of the task or project within the
> task or project.
I see.
You might want to add this simple explanation at the top of your
README.org since it seems to summarize the main feature of your cool
tool for Org-mode savvy people.
Thanks!
--
mail|git|SVN|photos|postings|SMS|phonecalls|RSS|CSV|XML to Org-mode:
> get Memacs from https://github.com/novoid/Memacs <
https://github.com/novoid/extract_pdf_annotations_to_orgmode + more on github
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-09-12 7:15 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-09-07 5:49 org-review is on melpa Alan Schmitt
2016-09-07 6:25 ` Clément Pit--Claudel
2016-09-08 11:02 ` Karl Voit
2016-09-09 6:50 ` Alan Schmitt
2016-09-10 20:12 ` Karl Voit
2016-09-12 7:15 ` Alan Schmitt
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).