unofficial mirror of notmuch@notmuchmail.org
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Matt Armstrong <marmstrong@google.com>
To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>,
	Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>,
	Gaute Hope <eg@gaute.vetsj.com>,
	notmuch@notmuchmail.org, Xu Wang <xuwang762@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: finding incoming messages in threads in which i've participated [was: Re: find threads where I and Jian participated but not Dave]
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 13:49:50 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <qf537amv5ht.fsf@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87vank9egp.fsf@tethera.net>

David Bremner <david@tethera.net> writes:

> Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net> writes:
>
>>
>> For example, would it make sense to have "notmuch new" (and "notmuch
>> insert") do "thread-based propagation" of specific tags?  for example,
>> consider the following (i've just made up the config options):
>>
>>     notmuch config set new.from_self_tags participated
>>     notmuch config set new.propagate_thread_tags participated
>>
>> the idea is that "new.from_self_tags" would be applied by "notmuch new" or
>> "notmuch insert" if the message was explicitly from: user.primary_email
>> or user.other_email.
>
> At the moment I'm more inclined to work on "doing things right" by
> adding xapian documents (database items) for threads. Many of the
> ideas in this thread amount to working around their absence. OTOH,
> it's certainly true that this last idea (unlike some of the query
> ideas) would be relatively straightforward to impliment.

David, that makes a lot of sense.

Take two other examples from my post-hook:

    # Unmute all threads with new messages sent to me.
    notmuch search --output=threads tag:new AND tag:me | \
      xargs --no-run-if-empty notmuch tag -muted --

    # Remove all muted threads from the inbox and mark
    # every message in them muted.
    notmuch search --output=threads tag:muted | \
      xargs --no-run-if-empty notmuch tag -inbox +muted --

Above I'm just operating on all the messages in a thread as a unit.  If
notmuch had a 'database item' for each thread, I could potentially tag
just that to achieve similar results with simpler commands.

It has some subtle implications.  E.g. when I tag through a particular
UI do I mean to tag a particular message or the thread?  Is it worth
making the user think about the difference?  Is there some way to
express this such that they never do?  Are some tags configured to
always apply to the thread?  Are these the only tags that do?  Or do
"thread tags" always contain the union of all associated message tags?

Fun stuff.  :)

  reply	other threads:[~2017-06-26 20:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-09 21:55 find threads where I and Jian participated but not Dave Xu Wang
2017-06-13 15:57 ` Xu Wang
2017-06-13 23:31   ` David Bremner
2017-06-14  0:24     ` Xu Wang
2017-06-14  3:32     ` Brian Sniffen
2017-06-15 17:54     ` Daniel Kahn Gillmor
2017-06-15 20:20       ` David Bremner
2017-06-16  1:07         ` Matt Armstrong
2017-06-16  6:28         ` Gaute Hope
2017-06-21 20:04           ` Matt Armstrong
2017-06-21 21:30             ` Daniel Kahn Gillmor
2017-06-22  6:08               ` Gaute Hope
2017-06-22  6:22                 ` Gaute Hope
2017-06-23  0:00                   ` Matt Armstrong
2017-06-25 15:46                     ` finding incoming messages in threads in which i've participated [was: Re: find threads where I and Jian participated but not Dave] Daniel Kahn Gillmor
2017-06-25 17:14                       ` David Bremner
2017-06-26 20:49                         ` Matt Armstrong [this message]
2017-06-26 23:09                           ` David Bremner
2017-08-20 13:35                           ` Jani Nikula
2017-08-20 13:48                         ` Jani Nikula
2017-08-20 21:32                           ` [PATCH] WIP: add thread subqueries David Bremner
2017-08-21  1:35                             ` David Bremner
2017-09-07 17:47                               ` Gaute Hope
2017-09-07 18:51                                 ` David Bremner
2017-06-25 17:40                       ` finding incoming messages in threads in which i've participated [was: Re: find threads where I and Jian participated but not Dave] Brian Sniffen
2017-06-26 20:54                       ` Matt Armstrong
2017-06-22 20:15               ` find threads where I and Jian participated but not Dave Matt Armstrong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://notmuchmail.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=qf537amv5ht.fsf@google.com \
    --to=marmstrong@google.com \
    --cc=david@tethera.net \
    --cc=dkg@fifthhorseman.net \
    --cc=eg@gaute.vetsj.com \
    --cc=notmuch@notmuchmail.org \
    --cc=xuwang762@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://yhetil.org/notmuch.git/

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).