Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] Solaris support

[Blake Jones <blakej@foo.net>]

> $ gcc compat/have_strsep.c
> compat/have_strsep.c: In function "main":
> compat/have_strsep.c:7:21: error: expected identifier or "(" before "const"
> compat/have_strsep.c:9:29: error: "delim" undeclared (first use in this function)
> compat/have_strsep.c:9:29: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
> zsh: exit 1     gcc compat/have_strsep.c
> 
> --- It is very easy to spot the problem ;)

Sigh, yes it is.  I started my Solaris port using some patches from
someone else who had done previous work on a Solaris port, and obviously
I didn't look at the patch very closely.  In fact, after fixing
have_strsep.c, I saw that I didn't even need it -- Solaris 11 has
strsep() in libc.  But I'd prefer to clean up this patch and leave the
compat version available for those compiling on older versions of
Solaris, if that's okay.

> $ gcc compat/check_asctime.c
> compat/check_asctime.c: In function "main":
> compat/check_asctime.c:15:5: error: too many arguments to function "asctime_r"
> In file included from compat/check_asctime.c:8:0:
> /usr/include/time.h:266:14: note: declared here
> zsh: exit 1     gcc compat/check_asctime.c
> 
> --- the posix-semantics way uses the 2-arg format. 
> 
> The logic of the test setting in this file doesn't open to
> me. Why not test the same way as in getpwuid_r() case ?

Yeah, that's clearly the right thing to do.  I was getting odd behavior
when I defined _POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS for getpwuid_r(), and it looks
like I fixed it in the wrong direction.

Did you happen to notice any other issues besides these two?  I'd rather
not spam the list with my ten-patch set if there's other silly stuff
that needs cleaning up.

Thanks again for testing this.

Blake