From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>
To: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
Cc: gwl-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: removing the bash-engine?
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 10:21:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJ3okZ1AVEifh11_+mp7jQnwQbRx7hevnqsFzYovrg6agJKBCA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ef99g4gu.fsf@elephly.net>
Dear Ricardo,
Naively, I thought that the bash engine produces a bash script usuable
without Guile. In fact, not. :-)
I was thinking that there was a fine point that I missed.
So, I agree it is safe to remove it and instead just use the simple
engine by default.
All the best,
simon
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-19 15:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-18 19:17 removing the bash-engine? Ricardo Wurmus
2019-01-18 9:21 ` zimoun [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.guixwl.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAJ3okZ1AVEifh11_+mp7jQnwQbRx7hevnqsFzYovrg6agJKBCA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=zimon.toutoune@gmail.com \
--cc=gwl-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=rekado@elephly.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).