* Re: removing the bash-engine?
2019-01-18 19:17 removing the bash-engine? Ricardo Wurmus
@ 2019-01-18 9:21 ` zimoun
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: zimoun @ 2019-01-18 9:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ricardo Wurmus; +Cc: gwl-devel
Dear Ricardo,
Naively, I thought that the bash engine produces a bash script usuable
without Guile. In fact, not. :-)
I was thinking that there was a fine point that I missed.
So, I agree it is safe to remove it and instead just use the simple
engine by default.
All the best,
simon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* removing the bash-engine?
@ 2019-01-18 19:17 Ricardo Wurmus
2019-01-18 9:21 ` zimoun
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ricardo Wurmus @ 2019-01-18 19:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gwl-devel
Hi,
The bash engine seems to be obsolete. All it does is generate a shell
script that calls the Guile shell script generated with the simple
engine. I think it’s safe to remove it and use the simple engine by
default.
What do you think?
--
Ricardo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-01-19 15:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-01-18 19:17 removing the bash-engine? Ricardo Wurmus
2019-01-18 9:21 ` zimoun
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).