From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.71) id 1gks6g-0004y4-2Y for mharc-gwl-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Jan 2019 10:00:22 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:52744) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gknKU-0007YX-JS for gwl-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Jan 2019 04:54:19 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gknKU-0005Bv-1u for gwl-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Jan 2019 04:54:18 -0500 Received: from mail-qt1-x830.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::830]:43324) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gknKP-0004w7-SH for gwl-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Jan 2019 04:54:15 -0500 Received: by mail-qt1-x830.google.com with SMTP id i7so17974173qtj.10 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2019 01:54:09 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87ef99g4gu.fsf@elephly.net> In-Reply-To: <87ef99g4gu.fsf@elephly.net> From: zimoun Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 10:21:36 +0100 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: removing the bash-engine? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: gwl-devel@gnu.org Dear Ricardo, Naively, I thought that the bash engine produces a bash script usuable without Guile. In fact, not. :-) I was thinking that there was a fine point that I missed. So, I agree it is safe to remove it and instead just use the simple engine by default. All the best, simon