From: "Pāladhammika via Guix-patches via" <guix-patches@gnu.org>
To: Maxime Devos <maximedevos@telenet.be>
Cc: 53929@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: [bug#53929] [PATCH] gnu: Add python-onlykey
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2022 22:15:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bCLP-lc1UWTrBzT2Tox0nPPXH8sT_oST7jMqJetu-ehofk40bTjD8M8mNA7R9U95uwuYbN-BOYAz_YamJ5QxIBWmxGBB8mdaZOv1PhL96qw=@protonmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <087add2ce88b652930582d187ac9fb6b7328df92.camel@telenet.be>
Taken from the horses mouth: "A command line interface to the OnlyKey (Similar functionality to OnlyKey App) that can be used for configuration, scripting, and testing." -- Is this considered sufficient?
All the best,
Pāladhammika
------- Original Message -------
On Saturday, February 12th, 2022 at 5:53 PM, Maxime Devos <maximedevos@telenet.be> wrote:
> Pāladhammika via Guix-patches via schreef op do 10-02-2022 om 21:30
>
> [+0000]:
>
> > + (synopsis "OnlyKey client and command-line tool")
> >
> > + (description "@code{OnlyKey Python Command-Line Utility} is a
> >
> > command line tool
> >
> > +targeted towards more advanced users. This can be used for
> >
> > configuration and testing.")
>
> This tells me that 'OnlyKey Python Command-Line Utility’ is a CLI
>
> tool with some configuration and testing, and it makes a distinction
>
> between ‘advanced users’ and ... ‘not-advanced users’?
>
> Making a judgement about user's ‘advancedness’ doesn't seem nice,
>
> can the description be factual and descriptive, so potential users
>
> can decide for theirselves whether this package is suitable for them?
>
> Also, this description doesn't tell me anything what this package is
>
> useful for. If I replace ‘Onlykey ... Utility’ by ‘shepherd’, then
>
> this might as well be a description for the 'shepherd' package.
>
> Greetings,
>
> Maxime.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-12 22:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-10 21:30 [bug#53929] [PATCH] gnu: Add python-onlykey Pāladhammika via Guix-patches via
2022-02-12 17:48 ` Maxime Devos
2022-02-12 22:02 ` Pāladhammika via Guix-patches via
2022-03-06 21:23 ` Ludovic Courtès
2022-04-05 16:09 ` Ludovic Courtès
2022-04-27 21:07 ` Ludovic Courtès
2022-02-12 17:53 ` Maxime Devos
2022-02-12 22:15 ` Pāladhammika via Guix-patches via [this message]
2022-02-12 17:55 ` Maxime Devos
2022-02-12 22:14 ` Pāladhammika via Guix-patches via
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='bCLP-lc1UWTrBzT2Tox0nPPXH8sT_oST7jMqJetu-ehofk40bTjD8M8mNA7R9U95uwuYbN-BOYAz_YamJ5QxIBWmxGBB8mdaZOv1PhL96qw=@protonmail.com' \
--to=guix-patches@gnu.org \
--cc=53929@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=maximedevos@telenet.be \
--cc=paladhammika@protonmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.