From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos@telenet.be>
To: "Gábor Boskovits" <gboskovits@gmail.com>
Cc: "Ludovic Courtès" <ludo@gnu.org>,
"Ricardo Wurmus" <rekado@elephly.net>,
"Guix Devel" <guix-devel@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Faster "guix pull" by incremental compilation and non-circular modules?
Date: Tue, 31 May 2022 10:49:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b15d6bd9db42a9e6932853ad66bc04f524aef0ee.camel@telenet.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAqdTgNdvjhT-G0TATOikFS66kqRXT9Ge-7kiG9PeBC9g6f8Wg@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 949 bytes --]
Gábor Boskovits schreef op di 31-05-2022 om 06:54 [+0200]:
> I was thinking about a bit of a different structure that can also be
> automated. My original idea was to use the already existing tree
> structure of the derivations, and split it based on depth. I think
> that gives a bit more structure, but might require splitting things
> that now are together (for example iirc sometimes we are defining
> bootstrap packages inheriting from the fully fledged ones, which
> introduces a syntactic dependency on something that is higher up the
> tree). Wdyt?
The package modules could be split and reorganised a bit to roughly
follow the derivation DAG, if that's what you mean (*)? Then the "guix"
package would depend on less -> compute-guix-derivation etc has less to
do, also good for lowering "guix $do_something" memory footprint.
Seems orthogonal to my proposal. I guess we could eventually do both?
Greetings,
Maxime.
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 260 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-31 8:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-20 10:05 Excessively energy-consuming software considered malware? Maxime Devos
2022-02-20 10:48 ` Tobias Platen
2022-02-20 11:13 ` Martin Becze
2022-02-20 16:52 ` Maxime Devos
2022-02-20 20:39 ` Martin Becze
2022-02-24 9:23 ` Hartmut Goebel
2022-02-24 11:18 ` Martin Becze
2022-02-25 0:27 ` Christine Lemmer-Webber
2022-02-25 12:41 ` Bengt Richter
2022-02-25 13:04 ` Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
2022-02-25 16:14 ` Bengt Richter
2022-02-25 16:32 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2022-02-25 16:49 ` Paul Jewell
2022-02-25 17:05 ` Maxime Devos
2022-02-25 17:35 ` Taylan Kammer
2022-02-25 19:00 ` Leo Famulari
2022-04-04 8:00 ` Attila Lendvai
2022-04-04 9:43 ` Maxime Devos
2022-04-04 10:15 ` Maxime Devos
2022-04-04 12:49 ` Attila Lendvai
2022-04-04 10:16 ` Maxime Devos
2022-04-04 10:37 ` Maxime Devos
2022-04-04 11:22 ` indieterminacy
2022-04-04 18:39 ` Liliana Marie Prikler
2022-02-24 9:13 ` Hartmut Goebel
2022-02-24 9:36 ` Attila Lendvai
2022-02-20 11:08 ` Ekaitz Zarraga
2022-02-20 11:27 ` Compiling blender Ricardo Wurmus
2022-02-20 11:34 ` Ekaitz Zarraga
2022-02-20 12:19 ` Faster "guix pull" by incremental compilation and non-circular modules? Maxime Devos
2022-02-20 16:47 ` Philip McGrath
2022-02-20 17:47 ` Semantics of circular imports Maxime Devos
2022-03-27 14:12 ` Philip McGrath
2022-03-27 14:19 ` Maxime Devos
2022-03-27 14:24 ` Maxime Devos
2022-03-27 14:33 ` Maxime Devos
2022-03-27 14:55 ` Maxime Devos
2022-03-28 4:24 ` Zhu Zihao
2022-03-30 4:50 ` Maxim Cournoyer
2022-02-28 13:17 ` Faster "guix pull" by incremental compilation and non-circular modules? Ludovic Courtès
2022-02-28 18:50 ` Maxime Devos
2022-05-31 4:54 ` Gábor Boskovits
2022-05-31 8:49 ` Maxime Devos [this message]
2022-05-31 10:23 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2022-02-20 15:54 ` Compiling blender Ricardo Wurmus
2022-02-20 16:14 ` Ekaitz Zarraga
2022-02-20 12:20 ` Excessively energy-consuming software considered malware? Taylan Kammer
2022-02-20 12:37 ` Maxime Devos
2022-02-20 12:44 ` Taylan Kammer
2022-02-20 14:59 ` Philip McGrath
2022-02-20 18:53 ` Christine Lemmer-Webber
2022-02-20 20:34 ` Jonathan McHugh
2022-02-20 12:32 ` Paul Jewell
2022-02-20 18:26 ` Liliana Marie Prikler
2022-02-20 19:36 ` Ryan Sundberg
2022-02-21 9:29 ` Attila Lendvai
2022-02-21 13:06 ` Maxime Devos
2022-02-21 18:56 ` raingloom
2022-02-21 23:02 ` Attila Lendvai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b15d6bd9db42a9e6932853ad66bc04f524aef0ee.camel@telenet.be \
--to=maximedevos@telenet.be \
--cc=gboskovits@gmail.com \
--cc=guix-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=ludo@gnu.org \
--cc=rekado@elephly.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.