bug#51492: Request to use GNU guix reproducibility bugs data for research project | University of Waterloo

bug#51492: Request to use GNU guix reproducibility bugs data for research project | University of Waterloo

[Muhammad Hassan]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 961 bytes --]

Hello,

I hope you are doing well.

I would like to scrap reproducibility bugs data from the linked website to use in my research project that is being conducted at the University of Waterloo. I am a Master's student.

The project aims to provide automated support for non-reproducibility detection.

Please tell me if there is an API that I can use to scrap the data.

https://issues.guix.gnu.org/
Guix issue tracker<https://issues.guix.gnu.org/>
Guix issue tracker. This is a web frontend to the Guix patch and bug trackers. Send email to guix-patches@gnu.org to submit a patch, or email bug-guix@gnu.org to submit a bug report.
issues.guix.gnu.org



Regards,

Muhammad Hassan
M.Math (Computer Science) || University of Waterloo

[https://uwaterloo.ca/brand/sites/ca.brand/files/styles/body-500px-wide/public/uploads/images/logo-vertical-.jpg?itok=rBgJ8S9H]

(+1) 548 994 4717 / LinkedIn<https://www.linkedin.com/in/muhammad1hassan>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 7208 bytes --]

Request to use GNU guix reproducibility bugs data for research project | University of Waterloo

[zimoun]

Hi,


On Fri, 29 Oct 2021 at 16:48, Muhammad Hassan <muhammad.hassan@uwaterloo.ca> wrote:

> I would like to scrap reproducibility bugs data from the linked
> website to use in my research project that is being conducted at the
> University of Waterloo. I am a Master's student.

Nice!  Thank for your interest to Guix.


> The project aims to provide automated support for non-reproducibility
> detection.

Non-reproducibility can be large. Against which one are you working?


> Please tell me if there is an API that I can use to scrap the data.

For instance, “guix build --no-substitutes” followed by “guix build
--check” allows you to locally build and rebuild for checking if the
build is reproducible – bitwise speaking.  Then, “guix challenge” allows
to check your local builds against the build-farm.  Note that two
build-farms are available [1,2] for various architectures.

The Guix project runs a Data Service to collect various data. This
service serves a JSON API (not-really documented but roaming on IRC
#guix helps ;-)).  One year ago (already, damned!), a tiny and drafty
script to somehow get the reproducibility coverage was around [3].  I
have not worked on it since then and I do not know if it still works.
Perhaps, it might be an entry-point for working on reproducibility data
from Guix.

Feel free to ask more details.


1: <http://ci.guix.gnu.org/>
2: <http://bordeaux.guix.gnu.org/>
3: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2020-10/msg00181.html>


Hope that helps,
simon

PS: I close the issue since it is not one, IIUC.  Instead, let redirect
to the mailing list guix-devel which seems a better place for discussing
such request. :-)

Re: Request to use GNU guix reproducibility bugs data for research project | University of Waterloo

[Julien Lepiller]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2323 bytes --]

The guix data service also has some info on reproducibility. See data.guix.gnu.org
(Select master, the latest processed revision, and add /package-reproducibility to the URL). This page compares between berlin and bordeaux.

There are a lot of unknowns because the build farms haven't both built some of the packages, so we can't compare, but of those tgat have been built on both sites, we can already observe some interesting differences.

Le 2 novembre 2021 08:01:51 GMT-04:00, zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> a écrit :
>Hi,
>
>
>On Fri, 29 Oct 2021 at 16:48, Muhammad Hassan <muhammad.hassan@uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
>
>> I would like to scrap reproducibility bugs data from the linked
>> website to use in my research project that is being conducted at the
>> University of Waterloo. I am a Master's student.
>
>Nice!  Thank for your interest to Guix.
>
>
>> The project aims to provide automated support for non-reproducibility
>> detection.
>
>Non-reproducibility can be large. Against which one are you working?
>
>
>> Please tell me if there is an API that I can use to scrap the data.
>
>For instance, “guix build --no-substitutes” followed by “guix build
>--check” allows you to locally build and rebuild for checking if the
>build is reproducible – bitwise speaking.  Then, “guix challenge” allows
>to check your local builds against the build-farm.  Note that two
>build-farms are available [1,2] for various architectures.
>
>The Guix project runs a Data Service to collect various data. This
>service serves a JSON API (not-really documented but roaming on IRC
>#guix helps ;-)).  One year ago (already, damned!), a tiny and drafty
>script to somehow get the reproducibility coverage was around [3].  I
>have not worked on it since then and I do not know if it still works.
>Perhaps, it might be an entry-point for working on reproducibility data
>from Guix.
>
>Feel free to ask more details.
>
>
>1: <http://ci.guix.gnu.org/>
>2: <http://bordeaux.guix.gnu.org/>
>3: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2020-10/msg00181.html>
>
>
>Hope that helps,
>simon
>
>PS: I close the issue since it is not one, IIUC.  Instead, let redirect
>to the mailing list guix-devel which seems a better place for discussing
>such request. :-)
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3207 bytes --]

bug#51492: Request to use GNU guix reproducibility bugs data for research project | University of Waterloo

[Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1176 bytes --]

Muhammad,

[CCing Christopher Baines, who may skip straight to the last 
paragraph because they're probably busy building cool stuff.]

Good luck in your research.

Muhammad Hassan 写道：
> Please tell me if there is an API that I can use to scrap the 
> data.
>
> https://issues.guix.gnu.org/

Hm, are you sure that our bug tracker is at all useful here?  I 
doubt it!  There are a relative handful of ‘foo isn't 
reproducible’ bugs but they're the opposite of comprehensive or 
standardised.  There are no categories nor labels nor automated 
closings when an issue is fixed.

I think what you really want is this[0] (source: [1]).

Mouth-watering indeed!

One problem: the Package Reproducibility page is gone :-(  I'm 
surprised: it was still there a few months ago.  Christopher, is 
this deliberate?  If so, is there any way we could help bring it 
back?  Is the historical data safe and is new data still tracked?

Kind regards,

T G-R

[0]: 
https://guix.gnu.org/static/blog/img/data-guix-patches-package-reproducibility.png
[1]: 
https://guix.gnu.org/eo/blog/2020/introduction-to-the-guix-data-service-the-missing-blog-post

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 247 bytes --]

Re: Request to use GNU guix reproducibility bugs data for research project | University of Waterloo

[Vagrant Cascadian]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 801 bytes --]

On 2021-11-02, Julien Lepiller wrote:
> The guix data service also has some info on reproducibility. See
> data.guix.gnu.org (Select master, the latest processed revision, and
> add /package-reproducibility to the URL). This page compares between
> berlin and bordeaux.

Thanks, just added a link at https://reproducible-builds.org/citests/

Been meaning to do that for ages...


> There are a lot of unknowns because the build farms haven't both built
> some of the packages, so we can't compare, but of those tgat have been
> built on both sites, we can already observe some interesting
> differences.

Yeah, the number of untestable packages looks a little low...

As of now, on x86_64:

    Matching (7210, 34.76%)
    Not matching (1748, 8.43%)
    Unknown (11784, 56.81%)


live well,
  vagrant

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 227 bytes --]