* bug#47007: dcb640f02b broke guix environment --container @ 2021-03-08 13:34 Jelle Licht 2021-03-09 11:10 ` Ludovic Courtès 0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Jelle Licht @ 2021-03-08 13:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 47007 Hello guix, I only tried this on x86_64 guix systems, one with Linux kernel 5.11.2, and also on a Linux-libre kernel 4.14.223. Running the equivalent of a `git bisect' starting some months back to today's master, and with the following test to select bad/good bisect revisions: `./pre-inst-env guix environment --ad-hoc --container --no-cwd --network hello' leads me to believe that the following commit broke something. dcb640f02b * file-systems: 'mount-file-system' preserves source flags for bind mounts. Did this commit expose an existing (but silent) issue, or did it introduce something new? For completeness' sake, the output of the guix environment invocation on 'bad' revisions: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- guix environment: error: mount: mount "/gnu/store/mmhimfwmmidf09jw1plw3aw1g1zn2nkh-bash-static-5.0.16" on "/tmp/guix-directory.Ji7KNW//gnu/store/mmhimfwmmidf09jw1plw3aw1g1zn2nkh-bash-static-5.0.16": Operation not permitted --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- I think kozo[m] on irc was hunting the very same issue as well: http://logs.guix.gnu.org/guix/2021-03-08.log#035557 Thanks, - Jelle ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* bug#47007: dcb640f02b broke guix environment --container 2021-03-08 13:34 bug#47007: dcb640f02b broke guix environment --container Jelle Licht @ 2021-03-09 11:10 ` Ludovic Courtès 2021-03-09 12:18 ` Jelle Licht 0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2021-03-09 11:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jelle Licht; +Cc: 47007 Hi, Jelle Licht <jlicht@fsfe.org> skribis: > I only tried this on x86_64 guix systems, one with Linux kernel 5.11.2, > and also on a Linux-libre kernel 4.14.223. > > Running the equivalent of a `git bisect' starting some months back to > today's master, and with the following test to select bad/good bisect revisions: > > `./pre-inst-env guix environment --ad-hoc --container --no-cwd --network hello' > > leads me to believe that the following commit broke something. > > dcb640f02b * file-systems: 'mount-file-system' preserves source flags for bind mounts. > > Did this commit expose an existing (but silent) issue, or did it > introduce something new? > > For completeness' sake, the output of the guix environment invocation on > 'bad' revisions: > > guix environment: error: mount: mount "/gnu/store/mmhimfwmmidf09jw1plw3aw1g1zn2nkh-bash-static-5.0.16" on "/tmp/guix-directory.Ji7KNW//gnu/store/mmhimfwmmidf09jw1plw3aw1g1zn2nkh-bash-static-5.0.16": Operation not permitted Could you run: ./pre-inst-env strace -f -o log guix environment --container and send the ‘log’ file (or the bits around the mount(2) calls)? Could you also show /proc/mounts? TIA! Ludo’. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* bug#47007: dcb640f02b broke guix environment --container 2021-03-09 11:10 ` Ludovic Courtès @ 2021-03-09 12:18 ` Jelle Licht 2021-03-09 16:17 ` Ludovic Courtès 2021-03-09 18:26 ` Martin via Bug reports for GNU Guix 0 siblings, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Jelle Licht @ 2021-03-09 12:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ludovic Courtès; +Cc: 47007 Ludovic Courtès <ludovic.courtes@inria.fr> writes: > Hi, > > Jelle Licht <jlicht@fsfe.org> skribis: > >> I only tried this on x86_64 guix systems, one with Linux kernel 5.11.2, >> and also on a Linux-libre kernel 4.14.223. >> >> Running the equivalent of a `git bisect' starting some months back to >> today's master, and with the following test to select bad/good bisect revisions: >> >> `./pre-inst-env guix environment --ad-hoc --container --no-cwd --network hello' This was intended to be, in case that was unclear: `./pre-inst-env guix environment --ad-hoc --container --no-cwd --network hello -- hello' >> [snip] >> guix environment: error: mount: mount "/gnu/store/mmhimfwmmidf09jw1plw3aw1g1zn2nkh-bash-static-5.0.16" on "/tmp/guix-directory.Ji7KNW//gnu/store/mmhimfwmmidf09jw1plw3aw1g1zn2nkh-bash-static-5.0.16": Operation not permitted > > Could you run: > > ./pre-inst-env strace -f -o log guix environment --container > > and send the ‘log’ file (or the bits around the mount(2) calls)? I ran it using a `guix pull'ed guix on the master branch, commit c4195a10783. I hope that's fine. There you go: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- 26123 stat("/gnu/store/mmhimfwmmidf09jw1plw3aw1g1zn2nkh-bash-static-5.0.16", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0555, st_size=4096, ...}) = 0 26123 mkdir("/tmp", 0777) = -1 EEXIST (File exists) 26123 mkdir("/tmp/guix-directory.9IH6jJ", 0777) = -1 EEXIST (File exists) 26123 mkdir("/tmp/guix-directory.9IH6jJ/gnu", 0777) = 0 26123 mkdir("/tmp/guix-directory.9IH6jJ/gnu/store", 0777) = 0 26123 mkdir("/tmp/guix-directory.9IH6jJ/gnu/store/mmhimfwmmidf09jw1plw3aw1g1zn2nkh-bash-static-5.0.16", 0777) = 0 26123 mount("/gnu/store/mmhimfwmmidf09jw1plw3aw1g1zn2nkh-bash-static-5.0.16", "/tmp/guix-directory.9IH6jJ//gnu/store/mmhimfwmmidf09jw1plw3aw1g1zn2nkh-bash-static-5.0.16", 0x15a2060, MS_RDONLY|MS_BIND|MS_RELATIME, NULL) = 0 26123 mount("/gnu/store/mmhimfwmmidf09jw1plw3aw1g1zn2nkh-bash-static-5.0.16", "/tmp/guix-directory.9IH6jJ//gnu/store/mmhimfwmmidf09jw1plw3aw1g1zn2nkh-bash-static-5.0.16", 0x15a20f0, MS_RDONLY|MS_REMOUNT|MS_BIND|MS_RELATIME, NULL) = -1 EPERM (Operation not permitted) --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > Could you also show /proc/mounts? --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- none /proc proc rw,relatime 0 0 none /dev devtmpfs rw,relatime,size=3944948k,nr_inodes=986237,mode=755 0 0 none /sys sysfs rw,relatime 0 0 /dev/sda1 / ext4 rw,relatime,data=ordered 0 0 none /dev/pts devpts rw,relatime,gid=996,mode=620,ptmxmode=000 0 0 none /sys/kernel/debug debugfs rw,relatime 0 0 tmpfs /dev/shm tmpfs rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime 0 0 /dev/sda1 /gnu/store ext4 ro,noatime,data=ordered 0 0 none /run/systemd tmpfs rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,mode=755 0 0 none /run/user tmpfs rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,mode=755 0 0 cgroup /sys/fs/cgroup tmpfs rw,relatime 0 0 cgroup /sys/fs/cgroup/elogind cgroup rw,relatime,name=elogind 0 0 cgroup /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset cgroup rw,relatime,cpuset 0 0 cgroup /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu cgroup rw,relatime,cpu 0 0 cgroup /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuacct cgroup rw,relatime,cpuacct 0 0 cgroup /sys/fs/cgroup/memory cgroup rw,relatime,memory 0 0 cgroup /sys/fs/cgroup/devices cgroup rw,relatime,devices 0 0 cgroup /sys/fs/cgroup/freezer cgroup rw,relatime,freezer 0 0 cgroup /sys/fs/cgroup/blkio cgroup rw,relatime,blkio 0 0 cgroup /sys/fs/cgroup/perf_event cgroup rw,relatime,perf_event 0 0 cgroup /sys/fs/cgroup/pids cgroup rw,relatime,pids 0 0 none /var/cache/fontconfig tmpfs ro,relatime 0 0 cgroup2 /sys/fs/cgroup/unified cgroup2 rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,nsdelegate 0 0 tmpfs /run/user/1001 tmpfs rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,size=790824k,mode=700,uid=1001,gid=997 0 0 --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- FWIW, I only have this issue on Guix System: on my Ubuntu 20.04.2 things JustWork(tm) Thanks for taking a look, - Jelle ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* bug#47007: dcb640f02b broke guix environment --container 2021-03-09 12:18 ` Jelle Licht @ 2021-03-09 16:17 ` Ludovic Courtès 2021-03-09 21:00 ` Ludovic Courtès 2021-03-09 21:05 ` Andreas Enge 2021-03-09 18:26 ` Martin via Bug reports for GNU Guix 1 sibling, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2021-03-09 16:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jelle Licht; +Cc: 47007 [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3226 bytes --] Hi, Jelle Licht <jlicht@fsfe.org> skribis: > There you go: > > 26123 stat("/gnu/store/mmhimfwmmidf09jw1plw3aw1g1zn2nkh-bash-static-5.0.16", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0555, st_size=4096, ...}) = 0 > 26123 mkdir("/tmp", 0777) = -1 EEXIST (File exists) > 26123 mkdir("/tmp/guix-directory.9IH6jJ", 0777) = -1 EEXIST (File exists) > 26123 mkdir("/tmp/guix-directory.9IH6jJ/gnu", 0777) = 0 > 26123 mkdir("/tmp/guix-directory.9IH6jJ/gnu/store", 0777) = 0 > 26123 mkdir("/tmp/guix-directory.9IH6jJ/gnu/store/mmhimfwmmidf09jw1plw3aw1g1zn2nkh-bash-static-5.0.16", 0777) = 0 > 26123 mount("/gnu/store/mmhimfwmmidf09jw1plw3aw1g1zn2nkh-bash-static-5.0.16", "/tmp/guix-directory.9IH6jJ//gnu/store/mmhimfwmmidf09jw1plw3aw1g1zn2nkh-bash-static-5.0.16", 0x15a2060, MS_RDONLY|MS_BIND|MS_RELATIME, NULL) = 0 > 26123 mount("/gnu/store/mmhimfwmmidf09jw1plw3aw1g1zn2nkh-bash-static-5.0.16", "/tmp/guix-directory.9IH6jJ//gnu/store/mmhimfwmmidf09jw1plw3aw1g1zn2nkh-bash-static-5.0.16", 0x15a20f0, MS_RDONLY|MS_REMOUNT|MS_BIND|MS_RELATIME, NULL) = -1 EPERM (Operation not permitted) On my machine (Guix System), the same thing works: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- 19524 mkdir("/tmp/guix-directory.Js9BMV/gnu/store/mmhimfwmmidf09jw1plw3aw1g1zn2nkh-bash-static-5.0.16", 0777) = 0 19524 mount("/gnu/store/mmhimfwmmidf09jw1plw3aw1g1zn2nkh-bash-static-5.0.16", "/tmp/guix-directory.Js9BMV//gnu/store/mmhimfwmmidf09jw1plw3aw1g1zn2nkh-bash-static-5.0.16", 0x153e200, MS_RDONLY|MS_BIND|MS_RELATIME, NULL) = 0 19524 mount("/gnu/store/mmhimfwmmidf09jw1plw3aw1g1zn2nkh-bash-static-5.0.16", "/tmp/guix-directory.Js9BMV//gnu/store/mmhimfwmmidf09jw1plw3aw1g1zn2nkh-bash-static-5.0.16", 0x153e0f0, MS_RDONLY|MS_REMOUNT|MS_BIND|MS_RELATIME, NULL) = 0 --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > /dev/sda1 / ext4 rw,relatime,data=ordered 0 0 > none /dev/pts devpts rw,relatime,gid=996,mode=620,ptmxmode=000 0 0 > none /sys/kernel/debug debugfs rw,relatime 0 0 > tmpfs /dev/shm tmpfs rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime 0 0 > /dev/sda1 /gnu/store ext4 ro,noatime,data=ordered 0 0 Here you have “ro,noatime,data=ordered” and I have “ro,relatime”. At any rate, it seems the bug is that in your case it should be picking MS_NOATIME and not MS_RELATIME, which is must have copied from /. Indeed, the trick to find the right device in that commit is wrong because it finds two devices in this case: root and the /gnu/store bind mount. --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- scheme@(guile-user)> ,use(guix build syscalls) scheme@(guile-user)> (filter (lambda (m) (= (mount-device-number m) (stat:dev (lstat "/gnu/store")))) (mounts)) $13 = (#<<mount> devno: 64768 source: "/dev/dm-0" point: "/" type: "ext4" options: "rw,relatime"> #<<mount> devno: 64768 source: "/dev/dm-0" point: "/gnu/store" type: "ext4" options: "ro,relatime">) --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- In my case it’s fine because they have the same options, but in your case it breaks because they have different options and it picks the wrong one. Could you try the attached patch? Thanks, Ludo’. [-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --] [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1157 bytes --] diff --git a/gnu/build/file-systems.scm b/gnu/build/file-systems.scm index aca4aad848..64c2557a43 100644 --- a/gnu/build/file-systems.scm +++ b/gnu/build/file-systems.scm @@ -920,11 +920,9 @@ corresponds to the symbols listed in FLAGS." ;; MS_REMOUNT call below fails with EPERM. ;; See <https://bugs.gnu.org/46292> (if (memq 'bind-mount (file-system-flags fs)) - (or (and=> (find (let ((devno (stat:dev - (lstat source)))) - (lambda (mount) - (= (mount-device-number mount) - devno))) + (or (and=> (find (lambda (mount) + (= (mount-point mount) + source)) (mounts)) mount-flags) 0) ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* bug#47007: dcb640f02b broke guix environment --container 2021-03-09 16:17 ` Ludovic Courtès @ 2021-03-09 21:00 ` Ludovic Courtès 2021-03-09 21:30 ` Andreas Enge 2021-03-10 9:52 ` Jelle Licht 2021-03-09 21:05 ` Andreas Enge 1 sibling, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2021-03-09 21:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jelle Licht, Martin; +Cc: 47007 [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 202 bytes --] Here’s a more sensible patch for you to try. This time it should correctly determine the necessary mount flags based on statfs(2) info. Could you apply it and report back? TIA! Ludo’. [-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --] [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/x-patch, Size: 4431 bytes --] diff --git a/gnu/build/file-systems.scm b/gnu/build/file-systems.scm index aca4aad848..304805db62 100644 --- a/gnu/build/file-systems.scm +++ b/gnu/build/file-systems.scm @@ -920,14 +920,8 @@ corresponds to the symbols listed in FLAGS." ;; MS_REMOUNT call below fails with EPERM. ;; See <https://bugs.gnu.org/46292> (if (memq 'bind-mount (file-system-flags fs)) - (or (and=> (find (let ((devno (stat:dev - (lstat source)))) - (lambda (mount) - (= (mount-device-number mount) - devno))) - (mounts)) - mount-flags) - 0) + (statfs-flags->mount-flags + (file-system-mount-flags (statfs source))) 0))) (options (file-system-options fs))) (when (file-system-check? fs) diff --git a/guix/build/syscalls.scm b/guix/build/syscalls.scm index 552343a481..6ed11a0d69 100644 --- a/guix/build/syscalls.scm +++ b/guix/build/syscalls.scm @@ -82,6 +82,21 @@ file-system-fragment-size file-system-mount-flags statfs + + ST_RDONLY + ST_NOSUID + ST_NODEV + ST_NOEXEC + ST_SYNCHRONOUS + ST_MANDLOCK + ST_WRITE + ST_APPEND + ST_IMMUTABLE + ST_NOATIME + ST_NODIRATIME + ST_RELATIME + statfs-flags->mount-flags + free-disk-space device-in-use? add-to-entropy-count @@ -754,6 +769,56 @@ fdatasync(2) on the underlying file descriptor." (define-syntax fsword ;fsword_t (identifier-syntax long)) +(define linux? (string-contains %host-type "linux-gnu")) + +(define-syntax define-statfs-flags + (syntax-rules (linux hurd) + "Define the statfs mount flags." + ((_ (name (linux linux-value) (hurd hurd-value)) rest ...) + (begin + (define name + (if linux? linux-value hurd-value)) + (define-statfs-flags rest ...))) + ((_ (name value) rest ...) + (begin + (define name value) + (define-statfs-flags rest ...))) + ((_) #t))) + +(define-statfs-flags ;<bits/statfs.h> + (ST_RDONLY 1) + (ST_NOSUID 2) + (ST_NODEV (linux 4) (hurd 0)) + (ST_NOEXEC 8) + (ST_SYNCHRONOUS 16) + (ST_MANDLOCK (linux 64) (hurd 0)) + (ST_WRITE (linux 128) (hurd 0)) + (ST_APPEND (linux 256) (hurd 0)) + (ST_IMMUTABLE (linux 512) (hurd 0)) + (ST_NOATIME (linux 1024) (hurd 32)) + (ST_NODIRATIME (linux 2048) (hurd 0)) + (ST_RELATIME (linux 4096) (hurd 64))) + +(define (statfs-flags->mount-flags flags) + "Convert FLAGS, a logical or of ST_* constants as returned by +'file-system-mount-flags', to the corresponding logical or of MS_* constants." + (letrec-syntax ((match-flags (syntax-rules (=>) + ((_ (statfs => mount) rest ...) + (logior (if (zero? (logand flags statfs)) + 0 + mount) + (match-flags rest ...))) + ((_) + 0)))) + (match-flags + (ST_RDONLY => MS_RDONLY) + (ST_NOSUID => MS_NOSUID) + (ST_NODEV => MS_NODEV) + (ST_NOEXEC => MS_NOEXEC) + (ST_NOATIME => MS_NOATIME) + (ST_NODIRATIME => 0) ;FIXME + (ST_RELATIME => MS_RELATIME)))) + (define-c-struct %statfs ;<bits/statfs.h> sizeof-statfs ;slightly overestimated file-system @@ -769,7 +834,7 @@ fdatasync(2) on the underlying file descriptor." (identifier (array int 2)) (name-length fsword) (fragment-size fsword) - (mount-flags fsword) + (mount-flags fsword) ;ST_* (spare (array fsword 4))) (define statfs ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* bug#47007: dcb640f02b broke guix environment --container 2021-03-09 21:00 ` Ludovic Courtès @ 2021-03-09 21:30 ` Andreas Enge 2021-03-10 9:52 ` Jelle Licht 1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Andreas Enge @ 2021-03-09 21:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ludovic Courtès; +Cc: 47007 Am Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 10:00:30PM +0100 schrieb Ludovic Courtès: > Here’s a more sensible patch for you to try. This time it should > correctly determine the necessary mount flags based on statfs(2) info. > Could you apply it and report back? This one works like a charm, thanks a lot! Andreas ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* bug#47007: dcb640f02b broke guix environment --container 2021-03-09 21:00 ` Ludovic Courtès 2021-03-09 21:30 ` Andreas Enge @ 2021-03-10 9:52 ` Jelle Licht 1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Jelle Licht @ 2021-03-10 9:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ludovic Courtès, Martin; +Cc: 47007 Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes: > Here’s a more sensible patch for you to try. This time it should > correctly determine the necessary mount flags based on statfs(2) info. > > Could you apply it and report back? I can confirm that it does what it says on the tin :-). Thanks again! - Jelle ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* bug#47007: dcb640f02b broke guix environment --container 2021-03-09 16:17 ` Ludovic Courtès 2021-03-09 21:00 ` Ludovic Courtès @ 2021-03-09 21:05 ` Andreas Enge 2021-03-10 11:25 ` Ludovic Courtès 1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Andreas Enge @ 2021-03-09 21:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ludovic Courtès; +Cc: 47007 Hello, incidentally I stumbled upon the same problem as Jelle today. Am Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 05:17:10PM +0100 schrieb Ludovic Courtès: > Could you try the attached patch? It raises an error: $ ./pre-inst-env guix environment -C --ad-hoc coreutils Backtrace: In ice-9/boot-9.scm: 1736:10 17 (with-exception-handler _ _ #:unwind? _ # _) In unknown file: 16 (apply-smob/0 #<thunk 7f421c659520>) In ice-9/boot-9.scm: 718:2 15 (call-with-prompt _ _ #<procedure default-prompt-handle…>) In ice-9/eval.scm: 619:8 14 (_ #(#(#<directory (guile-user) 7f421c65cc80>))) In guix/ui.scm: 2164:12 13 (run-guix-command _ . _) In ice-9/boot-9.scm: 1736:10 12 (with-exception-handler _ _ #:unwind? _ # _) 1731:15 11 (with-exception-handler #<procedure 7f420c8a2db0 at ic…> …) 1736:10 10 (with-exception-handler _ _ #:unwind? _ # _) In guix/store.scm: 636:37 9 (thunk) 1305:8 8 (call-with-build-handler _ _) 1305:8 7 (call-with-build-handler #<procedure 7f420c8a26f0 at g…> …) In guix/status.scm: 780:4 6 (call-with-status-report _ _) In guix/scripts/environment.scm: 768:14 5 (_) In guix/store.scm: 2066:24 4 (run-with-store #<store-connection 256.99 7f420c7448c0> …) In guix/scripts/environment.scm: 523:8 3 (_ _) In gnu/build/linux-container.scm: 327:16 2 (call-with-container (#<<file-system> device: "none…> …) …) In ice-9/boot-9.scm: 1669:16 1 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _) 1669:16 0 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _) ice-9/boot-9.scm:1669:16: In procedure raise-exception: In procedure =: Wrong type argument in position 1: "/" Andreas ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* bug#47007: dcb640f02b broke guix environment --container 2021-03-09 21:05 ` Andreas Enge @ 2021-03-10 11:25 ` Ludovic Courtès 2021-03-10 12:27 ` Andreas Enge 0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2021-03-10 11:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andreas Enge; +Cc: 47007 Hi Andreas, Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> skribis: > incidentally I stumbled upon the same problem as Jelle today. > > Am Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 05:17:10PM +0100 schrieb Ludovic Courtès: >> Could you try the attached patch? Could you instead try the latest patch? https://issues.guix.gnu.org/47007#6 Thanks! Ludo’. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* bug#47007: dcb640f02b broke guix environment --container 2021-03-10 11:25 ` Ludovic Courtès @ 2021-03-10 12:27 ` Andreas Enge 2021-03-10 22:24 ` Ludovic Courtès 0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Andreas Enge @ 2021-03-10 12:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ludovic Courtès; +Cc: 47007 Hello, Am Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 12:25:05PM +0100 schrieb Ludovic Courtès: > Could you instead try the latest patch? > https://issues.guix.gnu.org/47007#6 it looks like my reply was missed, I tried this patch, and it solves the problem for me, as for Jelle. So please push. Thanks! Andreas ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* bug#47007: dcb640f02b broke guix environment --container 2021-03-10 12:27 ` Andreas Enge @ 2021-03-10 22:24 ` Ludovic Courtès 0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2021-03-10 22:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andreas Enge; +Cc: 47007-done Hi! Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> skribis: > Am Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 12:25:05PM +0100 schrieb Ludovic Court鑚: >> Could you instead try the latest patch? >> https://issues.guix.gnu.org/47007#6 > > it looks like my reply was missed, I tried this patch, and it solves the > problem for me, as for Jelle. So please push. Done as b665dd4a9902b5722b9e06fd89c203e2221b19e0, thank you! :-) Ludo’. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* bug#47007: dcb640f02b broke guix environment --container 2021-03-09 12:18 ` Jelle Licht 2021-03-09 16:17 ` Ludovic Courtès @ 2021-03-09 18:26 ` Martin via Bug reports for GNU Guix 1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Martin via Bug reports for GNU Guix @ 2021-03-09 18:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jelle Licht, Ludovic Courtès; +Cc: 47007 Hello, On 3/9/21 12:18 PM, Jelle Licht wrote: > FWIW, I only have this issue on Guix System: on my Ubuntu 20.04.2 things > JustWork(tm) > > Thanks for taking a look, > - Jelle > I can confirm similar issues on my Guix Systems from below: canonical file name: /gnu/store/70rfnrwxxwmipvnfxg54bwyz5rkkl4ps-system label: GNU with Linux-Libre 5.11.4 configuration file: /gnu/store/pl31mxphv6hx36ab07j7i1wnv0l4pqp5-configuration.scm canonical file name: /gnu/store/8cny9lkvclz1wb06rvz6gywlb9nqqb7r-system label: GNU with Linux-Libre 5.11.3 configuration file: /gnu/store/pl31mxphv6hx36ab07j7i1wnv0l4pqp5-configuration.scm However the Guix System on the same hardware with the same basic configuration but using linux-libre-LTS JustWork(tm) fine: canonical file name: /gnu/store/p18smv0h2yygdhnc4gxhzjkck9hasmf3-system label: GNU with Linux-Libre 5.10.13 configuration file: /gnu/store/pl31mxphv6hx36ab07j7i1wnv0l4pqp5-configuration.scm Kind regards! Martin ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-03-10 22:28 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2021-03-08 13:34 bug#47007: dcb640f02b broke guix environment --container Jelle Licht 2021-03-09 11:10 ` Ludovic Courtès 2021-03-09 12:18 ` Jelle Licht 2021-03-09 16:17 ` Ludovic Courtès 2021-03-09 21:00 ` Ludovic Courtès 2021-03-09 21:30 ` Andreas Enge 2021-03-10 9:52 ` Jelle Licht 2021-03-09 21:05 ` Andreas Enge 2021-03-10 11:25 ` Ludovic Courtès 2021-03-10 12:27 ` Andreas Enge 2021-03-10 22:24 ` Ludovic Courtès 2021-03-09 18:26 ` Martin via Bug reports for GNU Guix
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.