bug#26752: Ansible & others' problems with wrapped '.ansible-real' scripts

[Jelle Licht <jlicht@fsfe.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1546 bytes --]

The current ansible package is still brokenin the same way.

Is there already an acceptable way of working around this problem?
Otherwise I could send my (extremely hacky) workaround that adds a specific
condition in the ansible source code to check for .ansible-real.

Thanks,
Jelle

2017-05-03 12:04 GMT+02:00 Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org>:

> Jelle Licht <jlicht@fsfe.org> skribis:
>
> > I had some problems getting current ansible package to work. It seems
> that
> > the bin/ansible script which is created as part of the
> python-build-system
> > via a call to `wrap-program' interferes with certain expectations ansible
> > has regarding how it and its subcommands are called.
> >
> > This mechanism does not work well with our generated created
> .ansible-real.
> > See [1] for a similar issue that has since been worked around in the
> newest
> > version of ansible.
> >
> > For now, I have a similar workaround that add some guix-specific checks
> to
> > ansible looking for being called as .ansible-real, though I do consider
> > this a hack. This problem is indicative of a bigger issue: the fact that
> > wrap-program currently leads to subtle bugs for lots of scripts. There
> has
> > been some noise on #guix about solving this problem in general.
>
> For the record, the discussion is visible here:
> <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-05-02#T1370586>.
>
> I think it’s bad for a program to rely on argv[0], but I also think
> those .thing-real are kinda ugly.  :-)
>
> Ludo’.
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2163 bytes --]