[bug#61583] [PATCH] gnu: git: Update to 2.39.2 [fixes CVE-2023-22490 & CVE-2023-23946].

["Leo Famulari" <leo@famulari.name>]

On Fri, Mar 3, 2023, at 22:39, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> CC: core team
>>
>> On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 at 12:44, Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On ven., 17 févr. 2023 at 18:04, Greg Hogan <code@greghogan.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> * gnu/packages/version-control.scm (git): Update to 2.39.2.
>>>
>>> As noticed previously for an update of Git, this implies a lot of
>>> rebuilds because git-minimal inherits from git.
>>
>> Well, I locally rebuilt all and maybe a couple of packages break.  The
>> rebuild is intensive and I do not know if such update should to master
>> or core-updates and/or use some grafts.
>>
>> For instance, QA is still saying nothing after 12 days.
>>
>>     https://qa.guix.gnu.org/issue/61583
>>
>>
>>> Well, I am checking if git-minimal is used only for the tests by some of
>>> the packages.
>>
>> I have tried to replace the plain ’git’ or ’git-minimal’ by
>> ’git-minimal/pinned’ for some packages.  It does not change much.
>>
>>
>>> For sure, it is a concern since it is a security fixes.
>>
>> Hum, we are not very reactive. :-)
>
> I think the number of rebuilt packages is in the thousands, so that's a
> core-updates change.  On master it should be grafted instead, if that's
> possible.

`guix refresh -l git git-minimal` shows only hundreds of rebuilds. Am I missing something?