Re: Testing needed for lzip substitutes!

[Pierre Neidhardt <mail@ambrevar.xyz>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1286 bytes --]

Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:

> When replying to a days-old message, please consider quoting the
> relevant bits.  :-)

Hmmm, actually, why would it be a matter of age?  I think it's only a
matter of context, and someone browsing the archive years later will not
mind if a reply was sent 1 day or 1 week later.  All that matters is the
full thread.  In my opinion a single email
is useless when not in the context of the entire thread.
So I believe that it makes more sense for email clients to use
threading than not.

Or maybe that's not what you meant :p

>> I haven't run built packages much recently, but any idea what could be
>> wrong?  (Assuming there is anything wrong and it's not just me.)
>
> I’m not sure what problem you’re referring to.  What I can say is that
> substitutes made starting from today are available as lzip.  So for
> example, if you run ‘guix pull’, the substitutes corresponding to the
> various derivations of Guix (‘guix-cli’, ‘guix-base-packages’, etc.)
> are available as lzip.

So I've tried with both qualif and ci, and qualif did not publish any
substitutes for me.  It works on ci.guix.gnu.org though, and I get
lzipped substitutes!  Hooray!


-- 
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 487 bytes --]