Re: staging merge into master

[Josselin Poiret <dev@jpoiret.xyz>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1182 bytes --]

Hi Maxim,

Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> writes:

> Hello,
>
> I'm planning to merge staging into master soon (tomorrow or friday),
> unless someone has a problem with it.  It includes at least two CVE
> fixes as well as a bunch of updates such as a newer gstreamer, ffmpeg,
> qt 5, python-cryptography and a few others, and seems to be close to
> master in terms of coverage (currently 68% for staging vs 73% for
> master, according to https://ci.guix.gnu.org/).
>
> I was able to reconfigure my system with it, and haven't seen issues so
> far.  Testing welcome!

I'm a bit conflicted on this one, as:
+ this could let us get rid of staging as well!
+ this might fix some build issues and package errors on core-updates
(as well as fix CVEs!)
- this might create some build issues and package errors on core-updates
- we might not have time for a full CI run on core-updates before this
week-end.

I don't have a particularly strong opinion either way, but if you do
merge it, could you make sure to also merge master into c-u and launch a
CI evaluation right afterwards?  Thanks for taking care of staging!

Best,
-- 
Josselin Poiret

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 682 bytes --]