Re: staging merge into master

[Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com>]

Hello,

Josselin Poiret <dev@jpoiret.xyz> writes:

> Hi Maxim,
>
> Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm planning to merge staging into master soon (tomorrow or friday),
>> unless someone has a problem with it.  It includes at least two CVE
>> fixes as well as a bunch of updates such as a newer gstreamer, ffmpeg,
>> qt 5, python-cryptography and a few others, and seems to be close to
>> master in terms of coverage (currently 68% for staging vs 73% for
>> master, according to https://ci.guix.gnu.org/).
>>
>> I was able to reconfigure my system with it, and haven't seen issues so
>> far.  Testing welcome!
>
> I'm a bit conflicted on this one, as:
> + this could let us get rid of staging as well!
> + this might fix some build issues and package errors on core-updates
> (as well as fix CVEs!)
> - this might create some build issues and package errors on core-updates
> - we might not have time for a full CI run on core-updates before this
> week-end.
>
> I don't have a particularly strong opinion either way, but if you do
> merge it, could you make sure to also merge master into c-u and launch a
> CI evaluation right afterwards?  Thanks for taking care of staging!

Sounds good.  If I feel confident tomorrow I'll merge it to master and
tackle the probably tricky merge to core-updates at the same time.

Thanks for tipping in along with Andreas!

-- 
Thanks,
Maxim