[bug#64779] [PATCH core-updates] gnu: coreutils: Skip tests which are broken on btrfs

[bug#64779] [PATCH core-updates] gnu: coreutils: Skip tests which are broken on btrfs

[Ryan Sundberg via Guix-patches via]

When building coreutils on a BTRFS filesystem, this test case
consistently fails.

* gnu/packages/base.scm (coreutils): Skip tests/cp/reflink-auto.sh
---
 gnu/packages/base.scm | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/gnu/packages/base.scm b/gnu/packages/base.scm
index 1fdfaf8a57..a9dab0b30f 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/base.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/base.scm
@@ -464,7 +464,11 @@ (define-public coreutils
                                ;; there might be some environmental factor
                                ;; here
                                ((" test-tls\\$\\(EXEEXT\\) ") " ")))
-                           '())
+                           '((substitute*
+                               ;; This test fails on BTRFS
+                               '("tests/cp/reflink-auto.sh")
+                               (("^#!.*" all)
+                                (string-append all "exit 77;\n")))))
                      (substitute* "Makefile.in"
                        ;; fails on filesystems where inotify cannot be used,
                        ;; more info in #47935
-- 
2.37.2

[bug#64779] [PATCH core-updates] gnu: coreutils: Skip tests which are broken on btrfs

[Maxim Cournoyer]

Hello,

Ryan Sundberg <ryan@arctype.co> writes:

> When building coreutils on a BTRFS filesystem, this test case
> consistently fails.
>
> * gnu/packages/base.scm (coreutils): Skip tests/cp/reflink-auto.sh
> ---
>  gnu/packages/base.scm | 6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/gnu/packages/base.scm b/gnu/packages/base.scm
> index 1fdfaf8a57..a9dab0b30f 100644
> --- a/gnu/packages/base.scm
> +++ b/gnu/packages/base.scm
> @@ -464,7 +464,11 @@ (define-public coreutils
>                                 ;; there might be some environmental factor
>                                 ;; here
>                                 ((" test-tls\\$\\(EXEEXT\\) ") " ")))
> -                           '())
> +                           '((substitute*
> +                               ;; This test fails on BTRFS
> +                               '("tests/cp/reflink-auto.sh")
> +                               (("^#!.*" all)
> +                                (string-append all "exit 77;\n")))))

Could you please report the issue to upstream, and add a comment with a
reference to the open issue?

-- 
Thanks,
Maxim

bug#64779: [PATCH core-updates] gnu: coreutils: Skip tests which are broken on btrfs

[Maxim Cournoyer]

tags 64779 + unreproducible
quit

Hi,

Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> writes:

> Hello,
>
> Ryan Sundberg <ryan@arctype.co> writes:
>
>> When building coreutils on a BTRFS filesystem, this test case
>> consistently fails.
>>
>> * gnu/packages/base.scm (coreutils): Skip tests/cp/reflink-auto.sh
>> ---
>>  gnu/packages/base.scm | 6 +++++-
>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/gnu/packages/base.scm b/gnu/packages/base.scm
>> index 1fdfaf8a57..a9dab0b30f 100644
>> --- a/gnu/packages/base.scm
>> +++ b/gnu/packages/base.scm
>> @@ -464,7 +464,11 @@ (define-public coreutils
>>                                 ;; there might be some environmental factor
>>                                 ;; here
>>                                 ((" test-tls\\$\\(EXEEXT\\) ") " ")))
>> -                           '())
>> +                           '((substitute*
>> +                               ;; This test fails on BTRFS
>> +                               '("tests/cp/reflink-auto.sh")
>> +                               (("^#!.*" all)
>> +                                (string-append all "exit 77;\n")))))
>
> Could you please report the issue to upstream, and add a comment with a
> reference to the open issue?

I've searched the upstream issue tracker, and found none about this.
I've built coreutils 9.1 and latest master from source on my Btrfs
machine, which ran the test suite fine.  I've also rebuilt the current
Guix coreutils package with success on the same machine.

I don't think the problem is with Btrfs, or at least it's not easy to
reproduce.

Closing for now.

-- 
Thanks,
Maxim