Re: branch master updated: gnu: sbcl: fix build on riscv64-linux.

Re: branch master updated: gnu: sbcl: fix build on riscv64-linux.

[Christopher Baines]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1511 bytes --]


guix-commits@gnu.org writes:

> This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
>
> efraim pushed a commit to branch master
> in repository guix.
>
> The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
>      new 2a6d2fc1d8 gnu: sbcl: fix build on riscv64-linux.
> 2a6d2fc1d8 is described below
>
> commit 2a6d2fc1d8e3434e283d6d2e559529b41a242fea
> Author: Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il>
> AuthorDate: Wed Jun 7 09:55:35 2023 +0300
>
>     gnu: sbcl: fix build on riscv64-linux.
>
>     * gnu/packages/patches/sbcl-riscv-Make-contribs-build-again.patch: New
>     file.
>     * gnu/local.mk(dist_patch_DATA): register it.
>     * gnu/packages/lisp.scm (sbcl): [source]<patches>: Use it here.
> ---
>  gnu/local.mk                                       |  1 +
>  gnu/packages/lisp.scm                              |  3 +
>  .../sbcl-riscv-Make-contribs-build-again.patch     | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 75 insertions(+)

Did this change need to go straight to master?

→ guix refresh -l sbcl
Building the following 314 packages would ensure 1615 dependent packages are rebuilt: ...

To me that says to be that this would be appropriate for staging [1].

1: https://guix.gnu.org/manual/devel/en/html_node/Submitting-Patches.html#index-rebuild-scheduling-strategy

Maybe this would be OK if the patch was applied in such a way that it
only affects riscv64-linux, but it isn't, so this affects all systems.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 987 bytes --]