guixsd

guixsd

[Isorkin]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 284 bytes --]

Hi.
How to fix codepage in putty/kitty? The terminal is displayed normally.
Bad view lines.
config.scm

(operating-system
  (host-name "guixsd")
  (timezone "Europe/Moscow")
  (locale "ru_RU.utf8")

-- 
С уважением,
 Isorkin                          mailto:Isorkin@mail.ru

[-- Attachment #2: kitty_2017-02-15_23-49-24.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 314165 bytes --]

Re: guixsd

[Ricardo Wurmus]

Isorkin <Isorkin@mail.ru> writes:

> How to fix codepage in putty/kitty? The terminal is displayed normally.
> Bad view lines.
> config.scm
>
> (operating-system
>   (host-name "guixsd")
>   (timezone "Europe/Moscow")
>   (locale "ru_RU.utf8")

I’m afraid I don’t know.  This appears to be a question about using
PuTTY.  The characters look fine in your VNC session, so this is nothing
that should be fixed by changing GuixSD settings.

~~ Ricardo

guixSD

[Job Hernandez]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 174 bytes --]

Hi, on the manual it says that the guixSD is not production ready. Im eager to start using this as my primary operating system-- when will it be production ready?
Thanks!
Job

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 466 bytes --]

Re: guixSD

[Mekeor Melire]

Job Hernandez <hdezlara17@protonmail.com> writes:

> Hi, on the manual it says that the guixSD is not production ready. Im eager to start using this as my primary operating system-- when will it be production ready?

For completeness, this is what the manual states at chapter 6.1.1:

> the Guix System Distribution (GuixSD) is not production-ready. It may
> contain bugs and lack important features.

I guess we have to wait for version 1.0 to be released so that GuixSD
can be called "stable". Personally, I don't know exactly when this is
expected to happen.

Anyway, GuixSD is already "usable". I personally even use it for
"production". And indeed it contains bugs sometimes and lacks important
features sometimes. But I can live with that.

If you want to find out if you can live with these issues, you could (1)
try out Guix package manager on top of another (so-called "foreign")
GNU+Linux distribution; (2) try out GuixSD inside a virtual machine; (3)
try GuixSD on a real computer.

Good luck :)

--
mekeor ~ EDD3 DFFA 76F6 11C0 145F 9A99 AC85 BAD8 A2F8 C868

Re: guixSD

[Ludovic Courtès]

Hello,

Mekeor Melire <mekeor.melire@gmail.com> skribis:

> I guess we have to wait for version 1.0 to be released so that GuixSD
> can be called "stable". Personally, I don't know exactly when this is
> expected to happen.

The current ETA is “less than a year”.  :-)

See
<https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2017-05/msg00428.html>
for a recent discussion of what’s missing for the “1.0” label.

Ludo’.