Re: 01/05: gnu: rhash: Update to 1.3.6.

Re: 01/05: gnu: rhash: Update to 1.3.6.

[Mark H Weaver]

Hi Tobias,

me@tobias.gr (Tobias Geerinckx-Rice) writes:

> nckx pushed a commit to branch master
> in repository guix.
>
> commit 53bed20918db76e021d39d6b82ac95a095893298
> Author: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@tobias.gr>
> Date:   Mon Apr 30 21:09:59 2018 +0200
>
>     gnu: rhash: Update to 1.3.6.

On core-updates, "guix refresh -l rhash" reports that 2739 rebuilds will
be needed.  How many rebuilds are required on master?  If it's a similar
number, then I think this commit should be reverted.

What do you think?

      Mark

Re: 01/05: gnu: rhash: Update to 1.3.6.

[Leo Famulari]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 615 bytes --]

On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 08:57:56PM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> On core-updates, "guix refresh -l rhash" reports that 2739 rebuilds will
> be needed.  How many rebuilds are required on master?  If it's a similar
> number, then I think this commit should be reverted.
> 
> What do you think?

On master, only a few packages depend on rhash, via cmake-3.11. The
default cmake is cmake@3.7.2.

On core-updates, commit 89db6c6de97d717c9c2b49d94305381f998b0ca2 updates
the dfault cmake so it depends on rhash, which explains the big reverse
dependency graph.

So, I think this commit is okay for master.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

Re: 01/05: gnu: rhash: Update to 1.3.6.

[Tobias Geerinckx-Rice]

Hullo,

On 2018-05-01 2:57, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> me@tobias.gr (Tobias Geerinckx-Rice) writes:
[...]
>>     gnu: rhash: Update to 1.3.6.
> 
> On core-updates, "guix refresh -l rhash" reports that 2739 rebuilds 
> will
> be needed.  How many rebuilds are required on master?

Four.

> If it's a similar number, then I think this commit should be reverted.

:-)

Kind regards,

T G-R

Sent from a Web browser. Excuse or enjoy my brevity.