bug#26617: [PATCH] gnu: Add gnustep-make.

bug#26617: [PATCH] gnu: Add gnustep-make.

[Kei Kebreau]

* gnu/packages/gnustep.scm (gnustep-make): New variable.
---
 gnu/packages/gnustep.scm | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/gnu/packages/gnustep.scm b/gnu/packages/gnustep.scm
index 6e729165c..b55b0ea29 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/gnustep.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/gnustep.scm
@@ -22,7 +22,9 @@
   #:use-module (guix packages)
   #:use-module (guix build-system gnu)
   #:use-module (guix licenses)
+  #:use-module (gnu packages base)
   #:use-module (gnu packages xorg)
+  #:use-module (gnu packages libffcall)
   #:use-module (gnu packages gnome)
   #:use-module (gnu packages gtk)
   #:use-module (gnu packages texinfo)
@@ -30,7 +32,33 @@
   #:use-module (gnu packages glib)
   #:use-module (gnu packages fontutils)
   #:use-module (gnu packages image)
-  #:use-module (gnu packages pkg-config))
+  #:use-module (gnu packages pkg-config)
+  #:use-module (gnu packages xml))
+
+(define-public gnustep-make
+  (package
+    (name "gnustep-make")
+    (version "2.7.0")
+    (source (origin
+              (method url-fetch)
+              (uri (string-append "ftp://ftp.gnustep.org/pub/gnustep/core/"
+                                  name "-" version ".tar.gz"))
+              (sha256
+               (base32
+                "1khiygfkz0zhh9b5nybn40g0xnnjxchk24n49hff1bwanszir84h"))))
+    (build-system gnu-build-system)
+    (arguments
+     '(#:tests? #f)) ; no check target
+    (native-inputs
+     `(("which" ,which)))
+    (home-page "http://gnustep.org")
+    (synopsis "GNUstep make package")
+    (description "The makefile package is a simple, powerful and extensible way
+to write makefiles for a GNUstep-based project.  It allows the user to write a
+project without having to deal with the complex issues associated with
+configuration, building, installation, and packaging.  It also allows the user
+to easily create cross-compiled binaries.")
+    (license gpl3+)))
 
 (define-public windowmaker
   (package
-- 
2.12.2

bug#26617: [PATCH] gnu: Add gnustep-make.

[Leo Famulari]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 945 bytes --]

On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 08:38:05PM -0400, Kei Kebreau wrote:
> * gnu/packages/gnustep.scm (gnustep-make): New variable.

Cool!

> --- a/gnu/packages/gnustep.scm
> +++ b/gnu/packages/gnustep.scm
> @@ -22,7 +22,9 @@
>    #:use-module (guix packages)
>    #:use-module (guix build-system gnu)
>    #:use-module (guix licenses)
> +  #:use-module (gnu packages base)
>    #:use-module (gnu packages xorg)
> +  #:use-module (gnu packages libffcall)
>    #:use-module (gnu packages gnome)
>    #:use-module (gnu packages gtk)
>    #:use-module (gnu packages texinfo)
> @@ -30,7 +32,33 @@
>    #:use-module (gnu packages glib)
>    #:use-module (gnu packages fontutils)
>    #:use-module (gnu packages image)
> -  #:use-module (gnu packages pkg-config))
> +  #:use-module (gnu packages pkg-config)
> +  #:use-module (gnu packages xml))

Are all of these new modules used?

> +    (home-page "http://gnustep.org")

Is there a package-specific home-page?

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

bug#26617: [PATCH] gnu: Add gnustep-make.

[Kei Kebreau]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1500 bytes --]

Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> writes:

> On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 08:38:05PM -0400, Kei Kebreau wrote:
>> * gnu/packages/gnustep.scm (gnustep-make): New variable.
>
> Cool!
>
>> --- a/gnu/packages/gnustep.scm
>> +++ b/gnu/packages/gnustep.scm
>> @@ -22,7 +22,9 @@
>>    #:use-module (guix packages)
>>    #:use-module (guix build-system gnu)
>>    #:use-module (guix licenses)
>> +  #:use-module (gnu packages base)
>>    #:use-module (gnu packages xorg)
>> +  #:use-module (gnu packages libffcall)
>>    #:use-module (gnu packages gnome)
>>    #:use-module (gnu packages gtk)
>>    #:use-module (gnu packages texinfo)
>> @@ -30,7 +32,33 @@
>>    #:use-module (gnu packages glib)
>>    #:use-module (gnu packages fontutils)
>>    #:use-module (gnu packages image)
>> -  #:use-module (gnu packages pkg-config))
>> +  #:use-module (gnu packages pkg-config)
>> +  #:use-module (gnu packages xml))
>
> Are all of these new modules used?
>

No. I accidentally "polluted" this patch with changes from the next one
to come. Only the base, tex, and texinfo modules are needed for this
patch*.

>> +    (home-page "http://gnustep.org")
>
> Is there a package-specific home-page?

It doesn't appear so.

* I've also realized that documentation is installed separately from the
main GNU building process, so I've added an appropriate phase now. The
only problem is that there's a PostScript file with a line that varies
depending on the build time. Is there a way to eliminate this variance
that you know of?

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --]

bug#26617: [PATCH] gnu: Add gnustep-make.

[Ludovic Courtès]

Kei Kebreau <kei@openmailbox.org> skribis:

> * I've also realized that documentation is installed separately from the
> main GNU building process, so I've added an appropriate phase now. The
> only problem is that there's a PostScript file with a line that varies
> depending on the build time. Is there a way to eliminate this variance
> that you know of?

It may be that this line is added by a separate tool, perhaps pdflatex
or whatever is used.  It’s this tool that we should fix.

If you could fine which tool that is and file a bug for this to
bug-guix, that would be great.

In the meantime you can happily commit gnustep-make.  :-)

Thanks,
Ludo’.

bug#26617: [PATCH] gnu: Add gnustep-make.

[Kei Kebreau]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 803 bytes --]

ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:

> Kei Kebreau <kei@openmailbox.org> skribis:
>
>> * I've also realized that documentation is installed separately from the
>> main GNU building process, so I've added an appropriate phase now. The
>> only problem is that there's a PostScript file with a line that varies
>> depending on the build time. Is there a way to eliminate this variance
>> that you know of?
>
> It may be that this line is added by a separate tool, perhaps pdflatex
> or whatever is used.  It’s this tool that we should fix.
>
> If you could fine which tool that is and file a bug for this to
> bug-guix, that would be great.
>
> In the meantime you can happily commit gnustep-make.  :-)
>
> Thanks,
> Ludo’.

Commited (both to master and to finding that bug)!

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --]